75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison
-
@Dragon3303 said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
One potential benefit to using Teams is that since it's included in the cost of the Microsoft Business Standard level is that it could maybe replace any other webmeeting/screen sharing software that is currently be used. I don't know that it's always that easy to get anonymous users in the Teams meeting however, so it may not fit the need for that. Our users have not had good experiences with Teams so far when they've had to interact with other organizations utilizing that.
We work with some companies that use teams, but they really only use it for the webconference stuff.
-
@Dragon3303 said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
One potential benefit to using Teams is that since it's included in the cost of the Microsoft Business Standard level is that it could maybe replace any other webmeeting/screen sharing software that is currently be used. I don't know that it's always that easy to get anonymous users in the Teams meeting however, so it may not fit the need for that. Our users have not had good experiences with Teams so far when they've had to interact with other organizations utilizing that.
The integration piece is great, and that it is free (when you have O365) is great. But there are free options that we like better like Rocket and Mattermost. More effort, since you run your own server, but having used both I'd prefer the effort of MM or Rocket over the effort of Teams.
-
@Pete-S said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@Dragon3303 said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
One potential benefit to using Teams is that since it's included in the cost of the Microsoft Business Standard level is that it could maybe replace any other webmeeting/screen sharing software that is currently be used. I don't know that it's always that easy to get anonymous users in the Teams meeting however, so it may not fit the need for that. Our users have not had good experiences with Teams so far when they've had to interact with other organizations utilizing that.
We work with some companies that use teams, but they really only use it for the webconference stuff.
We've got a big one that went to it because they wanted to be "all in" Microsoft. A decision that has bitten them over and over again, Teams being a very minor component of it. It's not been a good experience.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@travisdh1 said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
I've yet to figure out how to manage file shares in it properly. They all just get dumped into the same bucket and good luck finding what you need.
It's essentially just a front-end for Sharepoint isn't it? With each Teams channel being a Sharepoint site.
I have to confess that I've never had success using metadata to organise Sharepoint files and still organise everything into folders and sub-folders. I then regularly use Windows Explorer to manage those files and folders, which I find much easier than Sharepoint (poor) or Teams (terrible). IIRC, @scottalanmiller has preached against using folders in Sharepoint, but it's the only solution that has consistently worked for me. Maybe I'm just too old to learn new tricks, but I think Windows Explorer is an awesome application and hasn't been bettered (on Windows), despite its age.
Yup, that's me. Not that folders are broken or don't work, it's just that the power of Sharepoint gets exposed when you use metadata instead of folders. Sharepoint can be a pain to adjust to, but when you embrace it completely, it does offer a lot of power and flexibility. But it doesn't connect in that way with Explorer so you'd lose that power using that tool in that case.
-
Plus, I'm not sure if Teams works with metadata. Which is the kind of thing that frustrates me a bit with Teams - its a front-end for SharePoint, but a hobbled front-end. Meaning you keep having to select "Open in SharePoint" to do anything complicated.
But generally I find the advantages of "going all in" with Microsoft outweigh the disadvantages.
I've also found Teams getting used more and more by companies compared with Zoom. At the start of the pandemic it was all Zoom.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
But generally I find the advantages of "going all in" with Microsoft outweigh the disadvantages.
It's definitely alluring.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
I've also found Teams getting used more and more by companies compared with Zoom. At the start of the pandemic it was all Zoom.
Zoom was very much the "I don't know what to do but people are talking about this Zoom thing" fallback.
-
@scottalanmiller said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@Carnival-Boy said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
I've also found Teams getting used more and more by companies compared with Zoom. At the start of the pandemic it was all Zoom.
Zoom was very much the "I don't know what to do but people are talking about this Zoom thing" fallback.
Zoom is flat out easier to get into them teams. That’s the biggest reason it was first. Now because people are going all in with Microsoft teams is becoming dominant.
-
@jt1001001 said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@EddieJennings Handle it now while you can. We did not and let's just say its the wild west trying to wrangle it all back in
Do you have examples of this?
-
@JaredBusch said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@scottalanmiller said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@Carnival-Boy said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
I've also found Teams getting used more and more by companies compared with Zoom. At the start of the pandemic it was all Zoom.
Zoom was very much the "I don't know what to do but people are talking about this Zoom thing" fallback.
Zoom is flat out easier to get into them teams. That’s the biggest reason it was first. Now because people are going all in with Microsoft teams is becoming dominant.
Teams meetings have gotten significantly easier for non Teams users since the beginning of the Pandemic (that's not to say it's still as easy as Zoom - personally, I think they are about the same), so that's a major help there too.
-
@Dashrender said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@JaredBusch said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@scottalanmiller said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@Carnival-Boy said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
I've also found Teams getting used more and more by companies compared with Zoom. At the start of the pandemic it was all Zoom.
Zoom was very much the "I don't know what to do but people are talking about this Zoom thing" fallback.
Zoom is flat out easier to get into them teams. That’s the biggest reason it was first. Now because people are going all in with Microsoft teams is becoming dominant.
Teams meetings have gotten significantly easier for non Teams users since the beginning of the Pandemic (that's not to say it's still as easy as Zoom - personally, I think they are about the same), so that's a major help there too.
That's definitely true. At the beginning, even halfway through, I couldn't even join them. Now they mostly work just fine. I still don't like them, but they are much closer to other services than they were. Now they are "nearly as good" instead of "completely didn't work".
-
@scottalanmiller said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@Dashrender said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@JaredBusch said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@scottalanmiller said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
@Carnival-Boy said in 75 User Exchange On Prem vs. Office 365 Cost Comparison:
I've also found Teams getting used more and more by companies compared with Zoom. At the start of the pandemic it was all Zoom.
Zoom was very much the "I don't know what to do but people are talking about this Zoom thing" fallback.
Zoom is flat out easier to get into them teams. That’s the biggest reason it was first. Now because people are going all in with Microsoft teams is becoming dominant.
Teams meetings have gotten significantly easier for non Teams users since the beginning of the Pandemic (that's not to say it's still as easy as Zoom - personally, I think they are about the same), so that's a major help there too.
That's definitely true. At the beginning, even halfway through, I couldn't even join them. Now they mostly work just fine. I still don't like them, but they are much closer to other services than they were. Now they are "nearly as good" instead of "completely didn't work".
What's just so amazing is MS has has Skype for 2 or so decades.. and they still can't seem to get their heads out of their asses.
