Server Setup for Legal Firm
-
In the end - I'm made to wonder if the OP is little more than trolling. We have other treads where we talk about just the kinds of red flags we should avoid. Purposefully claiming Windows is the only secure choice, moving from cloud/hosted solutions to onsite with little to no reasons given, poor grammar, an explanation of things that aren't really that important to the subject at hand, and a near total lack of actual details of the situation and problem.
-
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
Server Brand, Family Model and Server OS (security has to be top notch no opensource please
)?This is a conflict in two ways.
First: Never apply arbitrary rules when they aren't in line with your goals, this is illogical.
Second: Open source is specifically vastly better specifically for security. I think you worded this incorrectly. If security was your goal, it is closed source you'd be wary to use, not open. -
@Dashrender said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
Server Brand, Family Model and Server OS (security has to be top notch no opensource please
)?I don't even know what this means? If it's not closed source you believe that it can't have top notch security? If you really believe that, than I'm going to say, this is not the forum for you.
Has nothing to do with this forum. Just with the industry that we are in.
-
@Dashrender said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
As for the actual question -
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
So we going to have a Local Domain as Mail Server.
You're having sync issues with Outlook and G-Suit - why keep using Outlook then? What's wrong with the online version of Google's apps? i.e. G-mail?
If Outlook is a must, why not look at migrating to O365 if you want better integration with Outlook? Last I looked, the pricing for the email and online storage components were about the same (and pure hosted email was $4/u/m last time I looked).
I agree. Office 365's email makes way more sense here (and costs less) given the needs and problems and desires.
Plus G Suite is mostly open source, and O365 is not. So using G Suite violates the one stated (but conflicting) requirement.
-
@Dashrender said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
To finish up this quoted bit - you didn't even mention what you planned to use for local email. Since you jumped on the Microsoft bandwagon on for everything else, I'm assuming you plan on moving to onsite Exchange, so that would be one more server you'll need.
Must be said... if security needs to be top notch, the first thing you'd avoid is unnecessary local services. There is no way to secure an on site email system like Microsoft or Google secure their hosted services.
-
@JasGOt said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
@Dashrender I didn't read his post that way at all. He already stated he is going to use MS Windows. I think he was just heading off alternate OSes that he may not be comfortable with "at the pass". Also, are there ANY open source OSes with poor security structure? If so, he doesn't want those to be suggested. Wording could have been better, but I don't see the implied statement you see.
What he said was "security has to be top notch no opensource please". There is open AND closed with good AND bad security. But open source has the best options (which is the most important, that there are bad is irrelevant, it's how good good can be is all that mattes since you choose which ones to use) and has the best security starting point (code review.) The most important risk of closed source software is specifically the security risks of no one being able to properly audit the code.
Also, you can't rule out open source today, even Microsoft is half open source at this point. Using Windows is fine, but he didn't state anything about operating systems, just no open source software at all.
-
@Dashrender said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
Aren't most server racks floor standing? I suppose there are some wall mounted ones, but how much storage are you thinking you're going to need?
There are flush to wall options for servers. But only for one or two.
-
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
Server Brand, Family Model and Server OS
I like Dell, but HPE is very good, too.
R740 is the "go to" general purpose server from Dell. HPE would be the DL380.
Hit up xByte for better Dell pricing.
Server OS - you never deploy old software, and since you already stated it was Windows, there is no possible variance in the answer here, right, it is Windows 2016 (unless 2019 releases again before your project starts.) But in any case, you always deploy "current Windows" if Windows is the requirement.
You never mention hypervisor. In your scenario, if it were me I'd use KVM, especially for security, stability, performance, and ease of use. But Hyper-V is quite good and your rule about no open source means your options are pretty limited - basically only Hyper-V.
-
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
Any help will be appreciated
You should be reading the replies to your post here instead of creating accounts all over the web and pasting the same question, especially on that one site
But I guess you're currently busy not reading replies elsewhere. -
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
We need AD and share point = Server A, Server B File Server (Heavy usage due to Documents and archives) (File Share back up to Cloud) Which cloud service should I Use? Web Hosting and one to for Client Database Management. Server C (Can the web hosting and Client database management system be on one Server?)
By "server", I am believing that you are intending to say "VM"? You only want one server, surely. Even at your top end projection of seventy users, you are not big enough to consider a second server yet.
Server A - you never put AD and Sharepoint together. Very different systems that are meant to be on their own. AD should be one VM, Sharepoint another.
Server B - why a separate file server from the file server you just mentioned, Sharepoint? And if you need to mix AD with something, it should be the fileserver, not Sharepoint.
Which cloud service? For what? To host your servers? Vultr is popular around here and supports Windows. Azure would be popular typically, as well.
Server C - web host and client data on the same VM seems like a very bad idea.
-
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
I am leaning to Floor Standing Server Rack (foresee future need to add storage), Intel Xeon processors,
I am assuming that you mean a Tower server? Physically, obviously, you need only a single server. So having a server rack is likely overkill. A whole rack just to hold one small server probably doesn't make sense.
Intel Xeon processor, singular. A single processor will be way more than what you need unless there is something that you have not mentioned here. File servers, Sharepoint, AD, web servers are all things that use very little processor and only seventy users, that's not much at all.
I'm confused you ask what form factor but earlier you asked which cloud host. Surely it is one or the other. If you are going with a cloud system you will have no physical server. If you have a physical server, you will have no cloud host?
-
@reid-cooper Yeah a lot of what Hari has said don't add up.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
Server Brand, Family Model and Server OS (security has to be top notch no opensource please
)?This is a conflict in two ways.
First: Never apply arbitrary rules when they aren't in line with your goals, this is illogical.
Second: Open source is specifically vastly better specifically for security. I think you worded this incorrectly. If security was your goal, it is closed source you'd be wary to use, not open.Do you have a macro to respond to stuff like this, or do you type it up each time?
-
@BRRABill said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
@scottalanmiller said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
@hari said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:
Server Brand, Family Model and Server OS (security has to be top notch no opensource please
)?This is a conflict in two ways.
First: Never apply arbitrary rules when they aren't in line with your goals, this is illogical.
Second: Open source is specifically vastly better specifically for security. I think you worded this incorrectly. If security was your goal, it is closed source you'd be wary to use, not open.Do you have a macro to respond to stuff like this, or do you type it up each time?
LOL, I type it up each time. If I get to the macro point, I write an article and link it.
-
If you do a search on the title here, you get this same topic, with no responses from the OP, in a few other locations. I think he ran away or something.
-
The best answer I've seen from another site is the one from LastChip at Tech Advisor by IDG:
"Why do you think many of the top tech companies in the world use Linux?
If you mean you're bringing this in house, you'd better have a world class security expert to monitor it. Security for a legal firm would be a nightmare and any breach could be catastrophic to your companies reputation.
I for one, wouldn't offer any guidance as it needs in depth analysis by an expert in your field.
With respect, the fact you're asking theses questions suggests you don't have that level of expertise."
-
Following up @hari, you had loads of responses in minutes. And we keep watching over this. I haven't seen you follow up here or any other community you joined for this question. Is there more that we can help with?
-
@Texkonc it's been a long time since ML has seen a 1PW.
-
what's 1PW?
-
one post wonder?
