ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Non-IT News Thread

    Water Closet
    91
    11.2k
    5.5m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403 @momurda
      last edited by

      @momurda said in Non-IT News Thread:

      @dustinb3403 No, that is not his reason. His reason is because most immigrants aren't white Christians.
      This is just a workaround so it doesn't get thrown out immediately. Also, there more American born citizens on welfare than legal immigrants, your argument is nonsense. Also ACA isn't welfare.

      This isn't my argument, don't take me as supporting Trump. And I totally agree there are a shit ton of Americans who are on welfare for their entire lives.

      That is why this argument is weird to me.

      I'd much rather put limits on Welfare for everyone so people have to have a job. I don't care sweep the streets of your city and we'll feed you and provide shelter.

      And I know the ACA isn't welfare, but it is government funded (through taxpayer dollars). Also I'm all for cheaper healthcare (new daughter. . . .)

      momurdaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • momurdaM
        momurda @DustinB3403
        last edited by momurda

        @dustinb3403 This rule would disqualify immigrants from becoming citizens if they use ACA. Justify this.
        I might as well say you should lose citizenship if you use ACA, or that your daughter cant be a citizen because you or her used this service.

        DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403 @momurda
          last edited by

          @momurda said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @dustinb3403 This rule would disqualify immigrants from becoming citizens if they use ACA. Justify this.

          The only way I could imagine justifying it is if the immigrants haven't and aren't paying taxes.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
            last edited by

            @dustinb3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

            @momurda said in Non-IT News Thread:

            @dustinb3403 This rule would disqualify immigrants from becoming citizens if they use ACA. Justify this.

            The only way I could imagine justifying it is if the immigrants haven't and aren't paying taxes.

            Many don't, but because they are paid illegally under minimum wage and aren't allowed to pay taxes. The tax discussion is booby trapped.

            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403 @momurda
              last edited by

              @momurda said in Non-IT News Thread:

              I might as well say you should lose citizenship if you use ACA, or that your daughter cant be a citizen because you or her used this service.

              You're taking this personally, first my daughter was born here, in the US, and has a US SSN. Her mother and parents migrated to the US and never (according to her) took advantage of any public services like food stamps.

              This however doesn't mean that they should be given citizenship.

              My point is the goal should be to have productive people come to the US, people who can be useful to the community as a whole.

              momurdaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • momurdaM
                momurda @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @dustinb3403 Not personal at all. Its a rhetorical statement to show how dumb this proposal is. Just asking why you or you family shouldn't lose citizenship if you use ACA. Immigrants cant be citizens if they use it, even if they pay taxes for it under this rule. Why should you or anybody else be different? Hell, why not take US citizenship away from everybody who has ever used welfare or ACA?

                DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @dustinb3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @momurda said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @dustinb3403 This rule would disqualify immigrants from becoming citizens if they use ACA. Justify this.

                  The only way I could imagine justifying it is if the immigrants haven't and aren't paying taxes.

                  Many don't, but because they are paid illegally under minimum wage and aren't allowed to pay taxes. The tax discussion is booby trapped.

                  The issue is that they come to the US illegally, hide from the process that exist to make them legal citizens and then can't become citizens because of the previous law breaking activities.

                  There are processes to being admitted to the US legally, let's improve and reduce cost for those processes rather than get stuck in the mud on things like this.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @momurda
                    last edited by

                    @momurda I'm willing to guess that Trump is thinking lifetime users of welfare of people who come to the US illegally are the ones he doesn't want here.

                    Like presidential terms, I'm for Welfare terms.

                    momurdaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • momurdaM
                      momurda @DustinB3403
                      last edited by momurda

                      @dustinb3403 This is for legal immigrants, not undocumented illegal immigrants. Do you know what the difference is? It sure sounds like you don't.

                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @momurda
                        last edited by

                        @momurda said in Non-IT News Thread:

                        @dustinb3403 This is for legal immigrants, not undocumented illegal immigrants. Do you know what the difference is?

                        Legal , yea sorry I'm busy and reading.

                        For legal immigrants this would be stupid. They need support to become productive members of society.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • KellyK
                          Kelly
                          last edited by

                          Asian Games start on Saturday: https://en.asiangames2018.id/.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            New Zealand bans sale of houses to most foreigners.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch
                              last edited by

                              New Spock cast for Star Trek: Discovery

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403
                                last edited by

                                SEC subpoenaed Telsa of ""privatization tweet"

                                zachary715Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • zachary715Z
                                  zachary715 @DustinB3403
                                  last edited by

                                  @dustinb3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                  SEC subpoenaed Telsa of ""privatization tweet"

                                  I think if the funding is indeed secured as his tweet stated, that he'll get a slap on the wrist ultimately. However, if for whatever reason any talks don't come to fruition and they remain public, I think he'll catch a lot of flack and be in bigger trouble from the SEC as well as investors who will look to file class action suits.

                                  RojoLocoR DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • RojoLocoR
                                    RojoLoco @zachary715
                                    last edited by

                                    @zachary715 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                    @dustinb3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                    SEC subpoenaed Telsa of ""privatization tweet"

                                    I think if the funding is indeed secured as his tweet stated, that he'll get a slap on the wrist ultimately. However, if for whatever reason any talks don't come to fruition and they remain public, I think he'll catch a lot of flack and be in bigger trouble from the SEC as well as investors who will look to file class action suits.

                                    True. And this is yet more proof that you shouldn't just barf out every thought that enters your head onto twitter.

                                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403 @zachary715
                                      last edited by

                                      @zachary715 the issue stems from the fact that he stated later he was in talks with some people about taking the business private and that "he would have the funding" and then later looking to find other private investors to purchase the business.

                                      The "funding secured" bit and then back tracking is what has him in trouble.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403 @RojoLoco
                                        last edited by

                                        @rojoloco said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        @zachary715 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        @dustinb3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        SEC subpoenaed Telsa of ""privatization tweet"

                                        I think if the funding is indeed secured as his tweet stated, that he'll get a slap on the wrist ultimately. However, if for whatever reason any talks don't come to fruition and they remain public, I think he'll catch a lot of flack and be in bigger trouble from the SEC as well as investors who will look to file class action suits.

                                        True. And this is yet more proof that you shouldn't just barf out every thought that enters your head onto twitter.

                                        Like our commander and qweef?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ObsolesceO
                                          Obsolesce
                                          last edited by

                                          Report details sexual abuse by more than 300 priests in Pennsylvania's Catholic Church

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                                            last edited by

                                            @obsolesce said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            Report details sexual abuse by more than 300 priests in Pennsylvania's Catholic Church

                                            Saw that the other day. Thousands of victims.

                                            DustinB3403D ObsolesceO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 344
                                            • 345
                                            • 346
                                            • 347
                                            • 348
                                            • 560
                                            • 561
                                            • 346 / 561
                                            • First post
                                              Last post