The Software RAID Inflection Point
-
So some normal choices:
- Linux: MD RAID, MD RAID inside LVM2, ZFS and soon BtrFS
- FreeBSD: ZFS or BSD LVM RAID
- Dragonfly: HammerFS
- Solaris: ZFS or Solstace
- Xen and KVM: Same as the Dom0 Linux instance or kernel version they utilize
- XenServer: MD RAID
- AIX: LVM
Microsoft is attempting to beef up their formally anemic software RAID offering after two whole decades of it being effectively unusable and are rebranding it as Storage Spaces and in time we might trust and recommend that system. But as of yet it does not have a track record to warrant consideration outside of a lab and the rebranding of historically bad software to hide former shame is never a good starting point for new software. This impacts both Windows and Hyper-V equally.
VMware has simply opted out of the software RAID business and does not offer it. They do not target customers at the size where RAID makes a lot of sense, for those that need it hardware RAID works just fine.
-
@scottalanmiller With Storage Spaces being "new" & VMware having no SW RAID, I'm surprised that no one has tried/attempted to make MD RAID 'easier/user friendly/simpler' (insert your fav term) to use & implement.
With the abundance of bigger, faster, cheaper SSDs & CPUs...this seems like a good time for MD RAID to be popular?
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@scottalanmiller With Storage Spaces being "new" & VMware having no SW RAID, I'm surprised that no one has tried/attempted to make MD RAID 'easier/user friendly/simpler' (insert your fav term) to use & implement.
With the abundance of bigger, faster, cheaper SSDs & CPUs...this seems like a good time for MD RAID to be popular?
Blind swap has a ton of value....I don't see it growing much legs, especially in SMB until it can provide that.
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@scottalanmiller With Storage Spaces being "new" & VMware having no SW RAID, I'm surprised that no one has tried/attempted to make MD RAID 'easier/user friendly/simpler' (insert your fav term) to use & implement.
MD really couldn't be much easier to use than it already is. Even having it send you email notifications isn't that difficult if you can read a man page.
I've not heard of anyone trying to port MD to a different system yet, and it really doesn't make sense except for one case as almost every player in the market has a software RAID system that's already as stable and fast, and that one player refuses to use one of the open source software RAID systems in favor of their own questionable code.
With the abundance of bigger, faster, cheaper SSDs & CPUs...this seems like a good time for MD RAID to be popular?
Can't get much more popular than it already is for those of us in the know, honestly.
-
@travisdh1 said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Can't get much more popular than it already is for those of us in the know, honestly.
Why is ML still recommending HW RAID?
Have you solved the blind swap issue or is that something you aren't really concerned with?
-
@travisdh1 said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
MD really couldn't be much easier to use than it already is. Even having it send you email notifications isn't that difficult if you can read a man page.
The issue with MD is how do you get yourself the ability to do "blind swap" ?
Hot swap isn't that big of a deal... as long as you hot swap the right drive, lol.
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@travisdh1 said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Can't get much more popular than it already is for those of us in the know, honestly.
Why is ML still recommending HW RAID?
Have you solved the blind swap issue or is that something you aren't really concerned with?
Blind swap isn't an issue with hardware raid, and in general, I think, for SMBs, at least, HW raid win's because of that.
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@travisdh1 said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Can't get much more popular than it already is for those of us in the know, honestly.
Why is ML still recommending HW RAID?
Have you solved the blind swap issue or is that something you aren't really concerned with?
Because the software RAID would rarely, if ever, be aware of the type of hardware it's it, i.e. a HP server, a Dell server, etc - it probably has no way of mapping a drive to a specific port on the chassis and lighting the lights, etc - the things needed to make Blind Swap work.
-
@dafyre said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Blind swap isn't an issue with hardware raid, and in general, I think, for SMBs, at least, HW raid win's because of that.
Agreed, but if MD is "better", why recommend a solution that is not as good!
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@dafyre said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Blind swap isn't an issue with hardware raid, and in general, I think, for SMBs, at least, HW raid win's because of that.
Agreed, but if MD is "better", why recommend a solution that is not as good!
Better is a matter of opinion - what's better a faster car or a more fuel efficient car?
That's the issue we have here - The main CPU has enough left over processor, etc to handle software RAID, but you give up blind swap. Both are very valuable.
-
@scottalanmiller recently made a post about how hardware RAID wasn't dead yet.. I don't recall if it was in here or it's own thread.
here it is.
https://mangolassi.it/topic/12043/why-the-smb-still-needs-hardware-raid/6
-
@Dashrender said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Because the software RAID would rarely, if ever, be aware of the type of hardware it's it, i.e. a HP server, a Dell server, etc - it probably has no way of mapping a drive to a specific port on the chassis and lighting the lights, etc - the things needed to make Blind Swap work.
In today's world with all the smart people we have, no one can write software that can map drives to a chassis?
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@Dashrender said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Because the software RAID would rarely, if ever, be aware of the type of hardware it's it, i.e. a HP server, a Dell server, etc - it probably has no way of mapping a drive to a specific port on the chassis and lighting the lights, etc - the things needed to make Blind Swap work.
In today's world with all the smart people we have, no one can write software that can map drives to a chassis?
If a hardware vendor wanted to, they easily could, but it would mean seriously hampering the number of options available on a general purpose server platform. NAS vendors do this all the time.
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@Dashrender said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Because the software RAID would rarely, if ever, be aware of the type of hardware it's it, i.e. a HP server, a Dell server, etc - it probably has no way of mapping a drive to a specific port on the chassis and lighting the lights, etc - the things needed to make Blind Swap work.
In today's world with all the smart people we have, no one can write software that can map drives to a chassis?
This might be doable for a small set of hardware, but there is a huge set of hardware out there, and every time a new one comes out, the software RAID team would have to do an update. This also requires that the FOSS guys get the needed specs either because the hardware vendors give them out, or the FOSS community hacks it's way to finding them.
-
@travisdh1 said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@Dashrender said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Because the software RAID would rarely, if ever, be aware of the type of hardware it's it, i.e. a HP server, a Dell server, etc - it probably has no way of mapping a drive to a specific port on the chassis and lighting the lights, etc - the things needed to make Blind Swap work.
In today's world with all the smart people we have, no one can write software that can map drives to a chassis?
If a hardware vendor wanted to, they easily could, but it would mean seriously hampering the number of options available on a general purpose server platform. NAS vendors do this all the time.
NAS vendors do it because they control all the hardware. Sure, Dell could do it for their system, and HP for theirs, etc - but why? They'd rather sell you a RAID card.
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@scottalanmiller With Storage Spaces being "new" & VMware having no SW RAID, I'm surprised that no one has tried/attempted to make MD RAID 'easier/user friendly/simpler' (insert your fav term) to use & implement.
With the abundance of bigger, faster, cheaper SSDs & CPUs...this seems like a good time for MD RAID to be popular?
Porting something at that layer is difficult and would probably prove to be unreliable without a large corporate backer to do it and none have that interest. For VMware it matters none as customers looking to use RAID are not paying customer so there is no business reason to add the cost and risk of porting MD (they could easily violate GPL in doing so, we well.) Microsoft already has a product that they want to promote and MD RAID would flag them as believing it to be a failure. Plus MD RAID is written to work on Linux, not Windows, porting it might involve starting over.
Basically, no commercial vendor has any business reason to care about getting good RAID working on these systems and no hobbyist would have a real incentive nor would you want to trust the "one guy in the basement" system for your core, underlying storage for niche deployments. It's just asking for trouble.
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Why is ML still recommending HW RAID?
https://mangolassi.it/topic/12043/why-the-smb-still-needs-hardware-raid/
-
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@dafyre said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Blind swap isn't an issue with hardware raid, and in general, I think, for SMBs, at least, HW raid win's because of that.
Agreed, but if MD is "better", why recommend a solution that is not as good!
Because you have to say "better", not just better. It's different. Software RAID is cheaper, faster and more flexible. But hardware RAID is simpler and better understood and when it comes to storage in the SMB, that's what matters most. Faster is of basically no importance in the SMB space; everyone thinks that it is, but it just isn't.
-
@Dashrender said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@travisdh1 said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@Dashrender said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Because the software RAID would rarely, if ever, be aware of the type of hardware it's it, i.e. a HP server, a Dell server, etc - it probably has no way of mapping a drive to a specific port on the chassis and lighting the lights, etc - the things needed to make Blind Swap work.
In today's world with all the smart people we have, no one can write software that can map drives to a chassis?
If a hardware vendor wanted to, they easily could, but it would mean seriously hampering the number of options available on a general purpose server platform. NAS vendors do this all the time.
NAS vendors do it because they control all the hardware. Sure, Dell could do it for their system, and HP for theirs, etc - but why? They'd rather sell you a RAID card.
Actually they can't, because they don't know the use case. It's not about controlling all the hardware, it's about controlling everything from the disk to the application. Hardware RAID does it by pre-determining how it will be used.
-
@travisdh1 said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@FATeknollogee said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
@Dashrender said in The Software RAID Inflection Point:
Because the software RAID would rarely, if ever, be aware of the type of hardware it's it, i.e. a HP server, a Dell server, etc - it probably has no way of mapping a drive to a specific port on the chassis and lighting the lights, etc - the things needed to make Blind Swap work.
In today's world with all the smart people we have, no one can write software that can map drives to a chassis?
If a hardware vendor wanted to, they easily could, but it would mean seriously hampering the number of options available on a general purpose server platform. NAS vendors do this all the time.
Exactly. It's that one is general purpose that makes it complicated.
