XenServer Export Performance Seems Poor
-
Tick tock tick tock
-
@Dashrender said:
I created a backup job so I could move forward with testing.
I've installed a 3 TB drive in another desktop. WIn7 SP1 x64 4 GB RAM 1 Gb network connection, same switch as XS.
Backup started at 8:18 AM CDT
Did you disable compression or not? Because that was the limiter before.
-
@Dashrender said:
@olivier said:
As you can see, you are not the first: https://bugs.xenserver.org/browse/XSO-44
Import/Export speed is a nightmare
Disabling compression is a good first step to avoid GZIP in XenServer (which is known to be slow).
is there a way to disable compression on the VM export option? I see that checkbox for backups, but the export button just starts a download process with no options.
Try reading.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@Dashrender said:
@olivier said:
As you can see, you are not the first: https://bugs.xenserver.org/browse/XSO-44
Import/Export speed is a nightmare
Disabling compression is a good first step to avoid GZIP in XenServer (which is known to be slow).
is there a way to disable compression on the VM export option? I see that checkbox for backups, but the export button just starts a download process with no options.
Try reading.
Stop trying to be a dick just because someone questions your favorite toy.
I did read. He stated the options and asked if there was a way to disable it. He never subsequently posted that he did or did not.
He stated he created a backup job. One can assume he chose that option because he is able to uncheck that box as stated. But that would be an assumption, not a fact.
-
If you read what @Dashrender said, there is no option to enable or disable the compression within Xen Orchestra (it doesn't exist). Since it appears you aren't testing the appliance, why are you trying to comment on the functionality of it?
-
OK guys.. please take your debate to a WC thread.
-
Doesn't answer your export question, but something I came across:
https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/xenserver-backup-compress-or-not-compress/ -
@JaredBusch said:
@Dashrender said:
I created a backup job so I could move forward with testing.
I've installed a 3 TB drive in another desktop. WIn7 SP1 x64 4 GB RAM 1 Gb network connection, same switch as XS.
Backup started at 8:18 AM CDT
Did you disable compression or not? Because that was the limiter before.
Yes I disabled compression for this backup job. When I created a new backup job for this - couldn't use the Export option - I did make sure to check the box to disable compression.
-
@BRRABill said:
Doesn't answer your export question, but something I came across:
https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/xenserver-backup-compress-or-not-compress/Cool thanks - and you're right, While he does say export in the opening line, he's not talking about a single export, he's talking about backups.
I love the more or less one button push to create a one time export/backup of the system, it would be nice though to get a prompt for options (compressed/not compressed). I also wonder - is it efficient to download the "export" through the browser download instead of a direct push like the backup function uses? i.e. is the browser adding any overhead?
With that in mind an option of what pre-mapped mountpoint (network or local) to save to, and compress or non-compress would be to great options to see for the "export" option.
-
A little more than 5 hours and 270 GB done.
It seems to be going about 2 times faster, maybe 3.
-
@Dashrender said:
I love the more or less one button push to create a one time export/backup of the system, it would be nice though to get a prompt for options (compressed/not compressed). I also wonder - is it efficient to download the "export" through the browser download instead of a direct push like the backup function uses? i.e. is the browser adding any overhead?
Right, since this basically is a full backup that is being downloaded to your browser.
-
@Dashrender In any case, it's not a "full" direct push: it goes through
xo-server, since we can't tell XenServer to push itself a VM somewhere. In fact, export is always working in "pull": a HTTP handler is opened by XAPI, and listen for HTTP GET request.This is valid for everything,
xe, XenCenter, XO export through your browser, XO backups etc.So it's not really an overhead with your browser,
xo-serverjust act as a proxy to deliver your file (so if you don't have network bottleneck between you andxo-serverthat's OK:XenServer --> xo-server --> browserA backup will do:
XenServer --> xo-server --> remote pointBut as I said, in any case,
xo-serverwill do a HTTP GET.The main bottleneck is Gzip compression first. If you disable it, that's another potential bottleneck: the XAPI HTTP handler speed.
Note: the possibility to ask XAPI to push a backup somewhere will be discussed with the XAPI team during Xen Hackathon. IDK if they could do something, but I'll be at their office to explain the issue, in front of the whole dev team.
-
By the way you can rename the topic title
-
@olivier said:
By the way you can rename the topic title
What would you propose?
The title is calling out XenServer, not XO, and as you've stated this is an actual known issue within XS. I'm definitely open to suggestions for a title change though.
-
@olivier said:
@Dashrender In any case, it's not a "full" direct push: it goes through
xo-server, since we can't tell XenServer to push itself a VM somewhere. In fact, export is always working in "pull": a HTTP handler is opened by XAPI, and listen for HTTP GET request.This is valid for everything,
xe, XenCenter, XO export through your browser, XO backups etc.So it's not really an overhead with your browser,
xo-serverjust act as a proxy to deliver your file (so if you don't have network bottleneck between you andxo-serverthat's OK:XenServer --> xo-server --> browserA backup will do:
XenServer --> xo-server --> remote pointBut as I said, in any case,
xo-serverwill do a HTTP GET.The main bottleneck is Gzip compression first. If you disable it, that's another potential bottleneck: the XAPI HTTP handler speed.
Note: the possibility to ask XAPI to push a backup somewhere will be discussed with the XAPI team during Xen Hackathon. IDK if they could do something, but I'll be at their office to explain the issue, in front of the whole dev team.
Thanks for the explanation. I look forward to what you can share after your discussion about the HTTP handler.
-
The 700 GB VM was backed up in 13 hours 50 mins with the following setup:
compression disabled
1 GB same switch transfer
SMB sharing protocol
4 TB WD Red drive (single drive) as the target
Windows 7 x64 4 GB RAMThis was 50% faster than using the export feature which enables GZIP and I was saving to a USB 3.0 device.
-
OK starting last test.
backup compress disabled
Win7 x64 4 GB RAM
1 GB same switch transfer
SMB sharing
2 TB USB 3.0 driveStarted at 9 AM CDT
-
@Dashrender said:
OK starting last test.
backup compress disabled
Win7 x64 4 GB RAM
1 GB same switch transfer
SMB sharing
2 TB USB 3.0 driveStarted at 9 AM CDT
I would expect this one to be the same as the last. I doubt you are hitting any kind of bottleneck on the target media.
-
@JaredBusch said:
I would expect this one to be the same as the last. I doubt you are hitting any kind of bottleneck on the target media.
Yeah, I'm already seeing that be the case. 2 hours in, 108 GB transferred.
-
@Dashrender The current title is perfect
(didn't see the change before)
