WYSIWYG HTML Editor
-
@dafyre said:
Dreamweaver is the WYSYWIG editor that I'm most familiar with that actually worked well with most everything... also the most pricey.
Dreamweaver is also not complaint with proper code.. It will fail verification every time.
-
@Jason said:
@dafyre said:
Dreamweaver is the WYSYWIG editor that I'm most familiar with that actually worked well with most everything... also the most pricey.
Dreamweaver is also not complaint with proper code.. It will fail verification every time.
Yea... The last time I used it, though, it worked better across more browsers than some of the other ones we tried.
-
@Jason said:
@dafyre said:
Dreamweaver is the WYSYWIG editor that I'm most familiar with that actually worked well with most everything... also the most pricey.
Dreamweaver is also not complaint with proper code.. It will fail verification every time.
Yeah, the concept of a WYSIWYG editor died nearly a decade ago. Nothing like this exists in any usable form today, AFAIK.
-
@dafyre said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@dafyre said:
I wouldn't mind finding a good one, but they all seem to b0rk the code somehow... Things may work great in Chrome, but not Firefox.... or they'll work great in Firefox, but not Chrome. (We won't even speak about IE, lol).
Dreamweaver is the WYSYWIG editor that I'm most familiar with that actually worked well with most everything... also the most pricey.
No love for that notepad++? ^_^
I love NotePad++, but it's not a WSYSWIG editor... That one is hand coding only (and generally my preferred style anyhow).
Back when I was still hand editing, I just used vi.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@dafyre said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@dafyre said:
I wouldn't mind finding a good one, but they all seem to b0rk the code somehow... Things may work great in Chrome, but not Firefox.... or they'll work great in Firefox, but not Chrome. (We won't even speak about IE, lol).
Dreamweaver is the WYSYWIG editor that I'm most familiar with that actually worked well with most everything... also the most pricey.
No love for that notepad++? ^_^
I love NotePad++, but it's not a WSYSWIG editor... That one is hand coding only (and generally my preferred style anyhow).
Back when I was still hand editing, I just used vi.
You might want to start yelling at us young whippersnappers and telling us to get off your lawn.
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@dafyre said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@dafyre said:
I wouldn't mind finding a good one, but they all seem to b0rk the code somehow... Things may work great in Chrome, but not Firefox.... or they'll work great in Firefox, but not Chrome. (We won't even speak about IE, lol).
Dreamweaver is the WYSYWIG editor that I'm most familiar with that actually worked well with most everything... also the most pricey.
No love for that notepad++? ^_^
I love NotePad++, but it's not a WSYSWIG editor... That one is hand coding only (and generally my preferred style anyhow).
Back when I was still hand editing, I just used vi.
You might want to start yelling at us young whippersnappers and telling us to get off your lawn.
back in my day we had to take each individual packet by hand 15 miles away in the snow
-
@wirestyle22 said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@dafyre said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@dafyre said:
I wouldn't mind finding a good one, but they all seem to b0rk the code somehow... Things may work great in Chrome, but not Firefox.... or they'll work great in Firefox, but not Chrome. (We won't even speak about IE, lol).
Dreamweaver is the WYSYWIG editor that I'm most familiar with that actually worked well with most everything... also the most pricey.
No love for that notepad++? ^_^
I love NotePad++, but it's not a WSYSWIG editor... That one is hand coding only (and generally my preferred style anyhow).
Back when I was still hand editing, I just used vi.
You might want to start yelling at us young whippersnappers and telling us to get off your lawn.
back in my day we had to take each individual packet by hand 15 miles away in the snow
... on parchment.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Yeah, the concept of a WYSIWYG editor died nearly a decade ago. Nothing like this exists in any usable form today, AFAIK.
The crazy part is the most of these WYSIWYG editors require the user to have unfettered admin account access.
-
@BRRABill said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Yeah, the concept of a WYSIWYG editor died nearly a decade ago. Nothing like this exists in any usable form today, AFAIK.
The crazy part is the most of these WYSIWYG editors require the user to have unfettered admin account access.
Which ones? I never saw that happen.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
The crazy part is the most of these WYSIWYG editors require the user to have unfettered admin account access.
Which ones? I never saw that happen.
That was me poking sarcastic fun at myself and my knowledge timeline.
-
@Romo said:
If you are familiar with bootstrap, you could try Pingendo it is free and easy visual desktop applicacion. If you want to buy, Pinegrow is also nice and is also a desktop app.
If you prefer online editing you could try one of these: Divshot, Jetstrap, Brix.io, bootply
I will add Codiad (http://codiad.com/) to this list as well. I like this one -- it has integrated Git support too!
-
Examples from the pingendo.com webpage, I have never used it personally but it looks nice:
Live Editing
http://pinegrow.com/images/live.edit.dither.gif
It supports bootstrap and foundation frameworks by default
http://pinegrow.com/images/bs.build.page.gif -
Wow... Frontpage really takes me back.
-
-
@BRRABill I'm using a cloud ide - http://c9.io which has a live view of the code.
My setup is...
source control: bitbucket.com
ide: c9.io
ci: deploybot.com
hosting: aws s3 / cloudfrontWith a single commit from within c9 new code is pushed out to the s3 bucket and cdn cache invalidated.