@siringo said in Migrating to xxxxx:
But how do you/we get around the problem of an interview panel asking " so how much experience do you have with Ansible, Salt, AD etc"
In this case, YOU are the panel. Don't ask those questions. This means the panel isn't qualified to hire someone in IT and/or isn't bothering to do their job. Either hold them accountable or get someone else to do it.
I had this conversation this week on LinkedIn actually.
This is a great question, but it is really important to frame its context. Because basically what we end up doing is this.... we make bad IT decisions with the anticipation that our company will also do a bad job at managing the company, and will hire bad IT, so we give them bad solutions that feel like maybe bad IT will be able to handle it.
Every step of that process is bad. It's a bad approach. Maybe your company IS bad, but if it is, you can't fix that. But don't be the problem, be the solution. If they screw it up after you are gone, that's 100% their problem. If you give them a bad solution believing that they are screw ups or can't be helped, that's your problem. Don't make it your problem, make it theirs. Leave them with the tools to do things well. If they choose not to, there was never anything that you could have done about it.
Basically, never use politics as an excuse to do IT badly. To IT well and ensure that true blame can never fall to you. Bad companies will always be bad. Just don't add to the problem.
however, even if they did ask this question, going to less common tech will still make them more likely to get reasonable results from a bad process. Using AD sets them up for the worst likely results.