@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
[Cambridge Analytica admits their illegal data and actions were responsible for Trump winning three states](He said that the work the company did, including research, analytics and targeted campaigning, allowed Mr Trump to win with a narrow margin of "40,000 votes" in three states.) and claims to have run his campaign.
I guess I am done with politics. It seems to boil down to the last liar wins...... 
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
@popester said in Non-IT News Thread:
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
UK, EU, and US all investigating Facebook over selling user data to CA.
I wonder why it was no big deal in 2012?
http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/20/friended-how-the-obama-campaign-connected-with-young-voters/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/03/facebooks-cambridge-analytica-scandal-explained/
Now I see. Cambridge paid for the app under the umbrella of "Academic Purposes". Yep, that's a romper room No No.
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Ex-Employee of Facebook Exposes that company may have made similar user data available to tens or hundreds of thousands of companies, just like they did for Cambridge Analytics.
"Project Targus."?
Is there any truth to the Zuckerberg dodging stock loss by dumping stock? Could it be illegal? I find it harder and harder to believe anything I read or hear.
@dustinb3403 said in Hyper-V Was working, now it isnt:
Based on the above information and the error code I called out, I'd take a look at the firewall settings and see if there is something off there.
IE: Due to what the error is saying, you aren't being allowed access purely due to being on a different sub
Thats a great point. They are, on different subnets. Gotta get better at reading the error message. Thanks man!! Will follow up if i get is working.
@dustinb3403 said in Hyper-V Was working, now it isnt:
Have you attempted to connect to this server using it's IP address rather than its FQDN?
Different error:
No matter what I do I keep getting the same issue. When trying to connect from my management server to the headless HOST I get the following.
This is the Host Machine.
This is the management machine which is a VM.
I keep going around in circles from everything I have googled. I did enable a virtual nic card which knocked me out and then i could not connect anymore. I was able to remove the vitual interface which caused the box to go back to the physical NIC. I reestablished connectivity to the box and can RDP into it. I can ping each box from one to the other. This tells me I am back on the network and everything is talking except I keep getting the WinRM cannot complete the operation. I am fully prepared to take the lumps due if it is something simple like "have you rebooted". (I have) I have really tried to get this one figured out but lack of experience is eating my lunch. Any pointers would greatly be appreciated.
Manager pinging host:
Host pinging Manager:
Apologies if this format is bad. Pointers on that would be good too. Thank you.
@nerdydad said in Non-IT News Thread:
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Surprised why? Anybody who opposes him "mysteriously" disappears.
HA! The Russian version Bill and Hillary. :face_with_stuck-out_tongue:
@dbeato said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@dbeato said in I can't even:
That's how you sell vests.
Sure has some
gutsballs.
FTFY
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@popester said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@tim_g said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@popester said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
There are currently no term limits on US Senators nor House of Representative either. It hasn't been since 1776. Where is the outrage?
We are ALWAYS outraged. It's a ridiculous system.
Do something about it since US congress won't.
https://www.lexisnexis.com/constitution/amendments_howitsdone.asp
"The other method of passing an amendment requires a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States. That Convention can propose as many amendments as it deems necessary. Those amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states."
This is kind of where I am at as well today. The Leviathan is running amok.
As the founding father's predicted it would. They knew that democracy at scale didn't work. Which is why they went for Republicanism not democracy. But republics had never been stable either, just better.
It's all full of corruption anyways, and will most likely always be... in the end, it's the greed and corruption that will likely end up destroying civilization.
One of the strengths of monarchies - very little corruption.
Granted, yet liberty is at the crowns whim. Tyranny is one a$$hole away.
Ah, BUT liberty is the obligation of the crown, it is at no obligation of the public. Liberty is always at a whim, the crown is the only time that there is an obligation to it, however.
I see your point on the Public side of things. You need a "civil society" for liberty to survive, which the US in my lifetime has shun and shed the "civil society" as if it were a strait jacket. I am missing the "Obligation" that the crown has to liberty. Do you mean as long as the individuals "liberty" serves the crown "liberty" is granted? Sounds like soft tyranny.
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@tim_g said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@popester said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
There are currently no term limits on US Senators nor House of Representative either. It hasn't been since 1776. Where is the outrage?
We are ALWAYS outraged. It's a ridiculous system.
Do something about it since US congress won't.
https://www.lexisnexis.com/constitution/amendments_howitsdone.asp
"The other method of passing an amendment requires a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States. That Convention can propose as many amendments as it deems necessary. Those amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states."
This is kind of where I am at as well today. The Leviathan is running amok.
As the founding father's predicted it would. They knew that democracy at scale didn't work. Which is why they went for Republicanism not democracy. But republics had never been stable either, just better.
It's all full of corruption anyways, and will most likely always be... in the end, it's the greed and corruption that will likely end up destroying civilization.
One of the strengths of monarchies - very little corruption.
Granted, yet liberty is at the crowns whim. Tyranny is one a$$hole away.
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@popester said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
There are currently no term limits on US Senators nor House of Representative either. It hasn't been since 1776. Where is the outrage?
We are ALWAYS outraged. It's a ridiculous system.
Do something about it since US congress won't.
https://www.lexisnexis.com/constitution/amendments_howitsdone.asp
"The other method of passing an amendment requires a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States. That Convention can propose as many amendments as it deems necessary. Those amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states."
This is kind of where I am at as well today. The Leviathan is running amok.
As the founding father's predicted it would. They knew that democracy at scale didn't work. Which is why they went for Republicanism not democracy. But republics had never been stable either, just better.
Ben Franklin called it.... It is kind of like the approach to socialism, it is eventually an abject failure wherever it has been applied, yet groups/generations come along and think that they can make it work. That all of those before us just did not apply it correctly. It is not a simple thing. Are "we the people" a collective to be ruled over or are we individuals attempting to work together? I wish i knew.
@dustinb3403 said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
Which this honestly means that they should be replaced with someone who isn't corrupted. But of course that would never happen because of the above rule "Don't bite the hand that feeds you. . . "
That is why the founding fathers put article 5 in place. They knew the hearts of men. Article 5 is the mechanism to change it and the second amendment is the means by which to "Hopefully" if necessary protect it.
@dustinb3403 said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui This is still performed within congress and the house. . .
They have no control over it and are bound to approve. All hell would break lose if they failed to do so.
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
@harry-lui said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
There are currently no term limits on US Senators nor House of Representative either. It hasn't been since 1776. Where is the outrage?
We are ALWAYS outraged. It's a ridiculous system.
Do something about it since US congress won't.
https://www.lexisnexis.com/constitution/amendments_howitsdone.asp
"The other method of passing an amendment requires a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States. That Convention can propose as many amendments as it deems necessary. Those amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states."
This is kind of where I am at as well today. The Leviathan is running amok.
@scottalanmiller said in China ends presidential term limits - The government is defending its vote:
Current German politics are interesting to watch for this reason. The need to "form a government" that represents the will of the people after the election is something the US doesn't have. In the US we vote for what we vote for and that's it, done. It's extremely different.
Excellent, thank you. I will look more into German politics so as to better understand. :thumbs_up_medium-light_skin_tone: