ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. FATeknollogee
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 3
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 155
    • Posts 1,984
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • Eliminate Print Servers: go LANless?

      Anyone using this or something similar? http://www.printerlogic.com/eliminate-print-servers/

      What is the LANless methodology to getting rid of these print servers?

      posted in IT Discussion printers print server lanless
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @Dashrender said:

      huh - have you asked that vendor if they are developing to be able to use Azure AD as well as legacy AD?

      Not lately, thx for reminding me. Let me check!

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @adam.ierymenko said:

      @FATeknollogee For us though, ZT always tends to focus on the future. We don't work too hard to support things that are too legacy, at least right now, because we are a very lean little startup. If we had more resources we might if there were a demonstrated market.

      Believe me, I love ZT. Getting ready to spend the $4/mo on a couple of networks 😃

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @scottalanmiller said:

      Or not use AD. Always an option.

      Not when you need the app & AD is the only option to authenticate!

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @scottalanmiller said:

      We only run so many apps, so nearly everything is inside of Office 365. So not SSO itself, but it acts basically that way.

      That makes sense.
      For those of us with legacy apps, we have to wait for our vendors to "catch up"

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @Dashrender I thought you just said you got rid of AD?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @scottalanmiller said:

      Mostly... we aren't authenticating. It's not needed today like it used to be. Tons of companies are moving away from it today, it just doesn't have the value that it used to have.

      But when we need it, Azure AD.

      Is there some form of SSO?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @Dashrender said:

      Oh i agree - and I'm trying to do the same, and I've already one it for one client.

      Same question for you @Dashrender What is your "AD"?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Pertino - Is Anyone Successfully Using Any Version Above 510 with DNS/AD Connect?

      @scottalanmiller said:

      I've seen people look at phasing it out. Not common, but it is definitely happening and accelerating. We did, for example.

      What is your new method of authenticating?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Napkin design...let's go LAN'less

      @gjacobse said:

      With so few users - why do you need such hardware.

      It could be 50 or 100, that's why it's a design on a napkin!

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Napkin design...let's go LAN'less

      @scottalanmiller said:

      What's stopping those from virtualization?

      Nothing, I was just trying to "broaden" the use case

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Napkin design...let's go LAN'less

      I agree no physical.
      I only added "physical" 'coz of Server 2k3/Legacy apps

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • Napkin design...let's go LAN'less

      See diagram of very simple old school LAN design (black dots = switches)

      Let's go "nu skewl" & transition LAN'less.

      Comment away or draw up your napkin design..

      0_1456354758081_upload-c21c92fe-346f-481e-bd19-bef1a8c1eff7

      0_1456354709890_LANless.pdf

      posted in IT Discussion lanless nu skewl
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Analysis of Locky ransomware

      @wirestyle22 said:

      I actually just send out a notice about this company-wide right before you posted. Ransomware is annoying.

      What was said in your notice?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Remote Windows 10 Upgrade - Success thank you ScreenConnect

      @JaredBusch
      That sounds good.

      What edition do you have & what was pricing like?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Remote Windows 10 Upgrade - Success thank you ScreenConnect

      @JaredBusch

      Cloud or Self hosted?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Remote Windows 10 Upgrade - Success thank you ScreenConnect

      @gjacobse said:

      ScreenConnect (SC) has been a really useful too. I like it over TeamViewer and LogMeIn...

      Why do you prefer SC over TV?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Hyper-V & XenServer backup & DR: single pane of glass

      @scottalanmiller said:

      I'm watching the videos trying to figure out what it does. Looks like a decent product but haven't seen any single pane of glass stuff yet.

      Did you at least find one compelling feature?

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Hyper-V & XenServer backup & DR: single pane of glass

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @FATeknollogee said:

      Alike is also claiming single pane of glass, backup in one hypervisor - restore in another etc

      Single pane of glass means all VM management, replication, capacity monitoring, failver, etc. Alike does that?

      Don't know about failover, but the other stuff yes (per the website), remember, my experience with this product is zero.

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • RE: Hyper-V & XenServer backup & DR: single pane of glass

      Alike is also claiming single pane of glass, backup in one hypervisor - restore in another etc

      posted in IT Discussion
      FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
    • 1 / 1