@gjacobse said in Suggestions for an IPTV player for Ubuntu:
@CCWTech
Silly question but,…..
20,000 iptv channels? How do you find anything?
At 10sec a channel that 35min to cycle through them,… ( if my math is anywhere to being close, which it doesn’t seem to be,… I don’t math)
That's how many are available. I can select which one's I really want (USA Channels, Spanish channels, etc.)
@DustinB3403 said in Suggestions for an IPTV player for Ubuntu:
I use Emby, simple to setup and maintain.
Never heard of it. I'll take a look.
@gjacobse That's what I am trying right now. It seems like it works reasonably well, except takes a bit of time to start up each time.
@scottalanmiller said in Broadcom Acquired VMware: Does KVM Have a Chance?:
@CCWTech said in Broadcom Acquired VMware: Does KVM Have a Chance?:
@Oksana You couldn't pay me enough to use VMware. KVM is the industry standard and has been for years. And VMware with the recent announcement to kill their free offerings is now just a sinking ship.
And it isn't like when it was free, it was worth it. It was laughable what a bad product it was for free. Paying for it is totally insane.
The people who are using VMware have to either be getting kickbacks or completely ignorant or incompetent tbh.
@EddieJennings said in MeshCentral Future:
The one ask I have of MeshCentral is Wayland support.
That's an issue with MANY remote access software. But for sure a nice feature to have.
@Oksana You couldn't pay me enough to use VMware. KVM is the industry standard and has been for years. And VMware with the recent announcement to kill their free offerings is now just a sinking ship.
I'm running Ubuntu Ubuntu 23.10 and looking for a player for IPTV. Everything I have tried (VLC, Jellyfin, etc.) can't handle 20K channels of IPTV...
@syko24 said in Move FSMO Roles Using PowerShell | Active Directory Domain Controller AD DC:
I'm a fan of the one liner assuming you are transferring all roles to the same DC.
Move-ADDirectoryServerOperationMasterRole -Identity "DC-Server" -OperationMasterRole 0,1,2,3,4 0: PDCEmulator 1: RIDMaster 2: InfrastructureMaster 3: SchemaMaster 4: DomainNamingMaster
Me too. This is what I normally use. SOOOO helpful.
Not sure why powershell made it so complicated to find who has the roles.
netdom query fsmo was so easy.
Looks like Microsoft is finally taking a hint from Linux -
@gjacobse said in MeshCentral Future:
@scottalanmiller said in MeshCentral Future:
1.1.13 is out today!
Nice!
I am trying to lean those who would make the decision to go to Mesh over the ‘solution’ we use now.
What is that 'solution'?
@Florida_man said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
The story of morals vs morals and Risk vs Reward
Guy A - It must be run Sever OS
Well, Guy A then just offer that service. Quote the Microsoft licensing as you know it, and let the customer decide. No need to be a crusader and convince everyone to have the same moral standard of black and white. It's admirable that you have a strict moral standard and won't perform the work. In reality, though alot of the world functions in gray.
Guy B - Save the customer money
Microsoft is a bully and my customer is small and working on thin margins. You know the risk is super low for an audit and probably even lower if they buy windows OS elsewhere. You probably end up doing what's best for customer, but also potentially risk your own neck. Nothing will happen to a customer with 6 employees. They will get a warning at best
The world functions in gray. When is that a justification for acting immorally?
So the justification is, Microsoft is a big corporation with evil people so it's okay to steal from them or you won't get caught and if you do the trouble you will be in is small.
Please remind me to never let you in my house... Honestly, working with clients who justify stealing based on the fact that they either have a crappy business plan or who they are stealing from is a big faceless corporation will bite you in the ass when they pull the same dishonestly with you.
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@scottalanmiller said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
It just boggles my mind that the plain English, or the Queen's English if you're a Canucklehead like me, is right freaking there.
Seriously.
Exactly. You just listed why in zero possible way can you be confused. It's plain as day that there is nothing that applies to Avimark.
Why are you arguing that it can be used and showing that it can't?
I'm done with this.
I've verified my interpretation as well as AVIMark's mini-setup as being valid.
Cognitive Dissonance. I suggest looking it up.
"My interpretation". It reminds me of people saying this is 'my truth'. Instead of 'the truth'.
Right now... knock on wood, Fedora 38 is running like a champ. I am pretty happy.
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@CCWTech said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@Obsolesce said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@Obsolesce We're going to have to agree to disagree.
The peer-to-peer setup has been around since Token Ring that I can think of off the top and abides by Microsoft's licensing.
We've been through audits in peer-to-peer settings, as mentioned SMB was our bread and butter, with nary an issue with setups like the p2p mentioned in AVIMark for their tiny setup. We're usually the ones schooling the auditors anyway.
TTFN
So you're saying Microsoft licensing terms do not apply if installed on devices on peer to peer networks?
You've got a lot of theft under your belt, then. Willful ignorance of terms. MVP of SBS means shit... as does (wrongfully) convincing auditors of theft.
As mentioned, let's agree to disagree. TTFN
EDIT: If you really think you have a case then report it to the BSA.
Accusing someone of theft based on an subjective interpretation of terms and conditions is a pretty serious accusation.
Suffice it to say, put up or shut up.
It is theft. There is no other way to look at it. The fact that you have to interpret it subjectively and not objectively speaks volumes.
And it's not the BSA that investigates. Microsoft works with a different company. One of the vet clinics that I am personally aware of that believes you can do this is being audited because they got caught.
BSA is in Canada.
As I've mentioned, peer to peer has been around for a very long time.
What I'm being told here is that every peer to peer setup was illegal and thus theft. Yet, in the audits we've participated in when a peer to peer was involved none were knocked for it.
It's pretty easy to sling the mud and armchair quarterback like this.
Show me some Microsoft based resources that clearly interpret things they way that is being stated here. Since the semantics and legalese seem to be the catch let's see a clear statement from Microsoft that a peer to peer setup where folks are sharing files and a printer or two is indeed illegal and thus "theft" as it's being called here.
Show me the money.
A high school student could understand this. You can not use it to host a server with certain exceptions. Because AVImark is not using just file share services, it doesn't fit the exceptions. That's it. So easy to understand.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/UseTerms/Retail/Windows/11/UseTerms_Retail_Windows_11_English.htm
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@Obsolesce said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@Obsolesce We're going to have to agree to disagree.
The peer-to-peer setup has been around since Token Ring that I can think of off the top and abides by Microsoft's licensing.
We've been through audits in peer-to-peer settings, as mentioned SMB was our bread and butter, with nary an issue with setups like the p2p mentioned in AVIMark for their tiny setup. We're usually the ones schooling the auditors anyway.
TTFN
So you're saying Microsoft licensing terms do not apply if installed on devices on peer to peer networks?
You've got a lot of theft under your belt, then. Willful ignorance of terms. MVP of SBS means shit... as does (wrongfully) convincing auditors of theft.
As mentioned, let's agree to disagree. TTFN
EDIT: If you really think you have a case then report it to the BSA.
Accusing someone of theft based on an subjective interpretation of terms and conditions is a pretty serious accusation.
Suffice it to say, put up or shut up.
It is theft. There is no other way to look at it. The fact that you have to interpret it subjectively and not objectively speaks volumes.
And it's not the BSA that investigates. Microsoft works with a different company. One of the vet clinics that I am personally aware of that believes you can do this is being audited because they got caught.
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
We're usually the ones schooling the auditors anyway.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall for that conversation!
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@JaredBusch said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
We've gone through plenty of audits where QuickBooks has a company file on one PC while there are two or more other PCs accessing that company file. No issues there.
Historically, QuickBooks has only used file sharing for this. The remote users are opening the QuickBooks data file over the network. This matches the restrictions last I knew.
AVImark is connecting to a database server running on the host computer to my understanding. This is not file services, print services, IIS, or ICS.
I added to my post above.
Their system specifications clarify exactly what their setup is and does. The small setup is peer to peer. No server OS required.
RTFM
No Manual is going to override MS Licensing.
What AVImark says doesn't matter so discussing it is silly. I could care less what their hardware specs say.
AVImark now requires Guardian to be running which takes it beyond file sharing. End of story.
I have talked to many Microsoft licensing specialists and they agree.
One clinic that believes that they can run Windows desktop with AVImark is the subject of a Microsoft Audit because of that. Yes, I have first-hand knowledge of this. AVImark is not going to pay for their legal defense. I promise you that.
@PhlipElder said in Can you run a Windows desktop OS as a server to run AVImark Veterinary Software?:
If the product says it can run on Windows 10 or 11 and falls under the 20 connection limit then go for it but with one caveat: Make sure the hardware has ECC memory to avoid a memory flipped bit error that can wreak havoc and at least a RAID 1 array between two SATA SSDs.
It doesn't matter what the product says. What is important is Microsoft's TOS. Can you do it? Sure. Is it legal? No.
