BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer
-
Same thing...
Aug 18 21:56:16 ubuntu systemd[1]: Started XO Server. Aug 18 21:56:19 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: (node:17131) fs: re-evaluating native module sources is not supported. If you are using the graceful-fs module, please update it to a more recent version. Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: /opt/xo-server/node_modules/bindings/bindings.js:83 Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: throw e Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: ^ Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: Error: Module version mismatch. Expected 48, got 47. Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at bindings (/opt/xo-server/node_modules/bindings/bindings.js:76:44) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/xo-server/node_modules/leveldown/leveldown.js:4:46) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/xo-server/node_modules/level/level.js:1:44) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/xo-server/node_modules/level-party/index.js:1:13) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/source/xo-mixins/store.js:2) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/source/xo-mixins/index.js:46) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/source/xo.js:7) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/source/index.js:28) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/xo-server/index.js:11:18) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at require (internal/module.js:20:19) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu xo-server[17131]: at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/xo-server/bin/xo-server:31:25) Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu systemd[1]: xo-server.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu systemd[1]: xo-server.service: Unit entered failed state. Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu systemd[1]: xo-server.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu systemd[1]: xo-server.service: Service hold-off time over, scheduling restart. Aug 18 21:56:20 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopped XO Server.
-
@BRRABill Trying on my install now (still on Ubuntu 15.10).
-
@BRRABill Mine built / loaded without issue. Did you try manually resolving the issue with
npm rebuild node-sass
? I'm guessing that you need to be in\opt\xo-web
before issuing. -
@Danp said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
npm rebuild node-sass
When it is starting, said it was using node 6.4
Which @olivier said is not rightsudo npm rebuild node-sass [sudo] password for willard: > [email protected] install /opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sass > node scripts/install.js > [email protected] postinstall /opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sass > node scripts/build.js "/opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sass/vendor/linux-x64-48/binding.node" exists. testing binary. Binary is fine; exiting. [email protected] /opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sass ```
-
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
When it is starting, said it was using node 6.4
Which @olivier said is not rightThere's nothing wrong with the newer node version. It's just not officially supported by the XO team. You could switch to the older version using
sudo n stable
.sudo npm rebuild node-sass
[sudo] password for willard:[email protected] install /opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sass
node scripts/install.js[email protected] postinstall /opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sass
node scripts/build.js"/opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sass/vendor/linux-x64-48/binding.node" exists.
testing binary.
Binary is fine; exiting.
[email protected] /opt/xo-web/node_modules/node-sassDon't see anything inherently wrong here. <shrug>
-
@BRRABill Did you try restarting XO after doing this?
-
@Danp said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill Did you try restarting XO after doing this?
Yeah.
I'm just going to reinstall XO.
And make a mental note to take snapshots before updating anything!
-
@BRRABill
I'm wondering if you ever solved the 4 TB of data/snapshots/stuff that you had a problem with. That is a lot of posts to read and I don't know where it was in the thread. -
@momurda said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill
I'm wondering if you ever solved the 4 TB of data/snapshots/stuff that you had a problem with. That is a lot of posts to read and I don't know where it was in the thread.That wasn't me.
I have had an f-ton of problems, but not that one.
-
@BRRABill
Ah, whoops.
I was going to suggest XOA Free's web interface, specifically the SR view that shows disk details for a given SR. I had a similar issue and that view allowed me to erase the bad vdis accurately and easily in case that person(don't remember who it was apparently) is reading this thread too. -
Set up a new 15.10 VM, and installed XO with no issues.
Man I love open source and virtualization!
-
@BRRABill Just remember that 15.10s EOL was July 28, so it will not be receiving any more updates.
-
@Romo said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill Just remember that 15.10s EOL was July 28, so it will not be receiving any more updates.
I only used that because that is what everyone else is using and I got comments moving to 16.
But now I am questioning my decision.
-
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@Romo said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill Just remember that 15.10s EOL was July 28, so it will not be receiving any more updates.
I only used that because that is what everyone else is using and I got comments moving to 16.
But now I am questioning my decision.
Just an old thread. If you use Ubuntu, you update continuously. Just how it works.
-
@StrongBad said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@Romo said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill Just remember that 15.10s EOL was July 28, so it will not be receiving any more updates.
I only used that because that is what everyone else is using and I got comments moving to 16.
But now I am questioning my decision.
Just an old thread. If you use Ubuntu, you update continuously. Just how it works.
This was a few weeks ago.
I think it was more a "XO doesn't support" 16, but technically they don't support anything.
-
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
I think it was more a "XO doesn't support" 16, but technically they don't support anything.
"Support" is always a weird term. Microsoft doesn't support any product unless you pay for extra support. Why do people never worry that Windows isn't supported but are worried that a non-critical web application is?
-
@scottalanmiller said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
I think it was more a "XO doesn't support" 16, but technically they don't support anything.
"Support" is always a weird term. Microsoft doesn't support any product unless you pay for extra support. Why do people never worry that Windows isn't supported but are worried that a non-critical web application is?
I tell you what, if other software companies gave as much support as @olivier gives here for his "non-supported" software, the world would be a better place.
-
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@scottalanmiller said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
I think it was more a "XO doesn't support" 16, but technically they don't support anything.
"Support" is always a weird term. Microsoft doesn't support any product unless you pay for extra support. Why do people never worry that Windows isn't supported but are worried that a non-critical web application is?
I tell you what, if other software companies gave as much support as @olivier gives here for his "non-supported" software, the world would be a better place.
If only other companies knew their products as well!
-
For the next foray into the field of XS...
For those of you running XS, what are you doing about power management?
-
@BRRABill said in BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer:
For the next foray into the field of XS...
For those of you running XS, what are you doing about power management?
Multiple UPS for redundant power in case of a power outage. There is a way to get a I believe APC UPSs to work with XS.