Rapid Desktop Replacement
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@BRRABill said:
I understand this is more on a personal/hobby/SOHO basis. Most companies of any size would be using VL and imaging.
But NOT imaging of the machine to be restored. New builds from a central image. No one anywhere at any size is normally doing full image / replace strategies for desktops. It's just not how it is done, it is not practical.
Yep. Even at a small scale if you really wanted this all you need is 1 VL of windows that you are using (as long as the computers are licesned for the same version or newer that has downgrade rights [must be same edition which is going to be Pro]) and 1 server that you can set up WDS on. And if you don't have more than 2 people doing the imaging you shouldn't need more than the 2 administrative cals windows comes with.
-
And you can do it sans WDS too. You can use tools like FOG or Clonezilla or Veeam or whatever you like.
-
@Jason said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@BRRABill said:
I understand this is more on a personal/hobby/SOHO basis. Most companies of any size would be using VL and imaging.
But NOT imaging of the machine to be restored. New builds from a central image. No one anywhere at any size is normally doing full image / replace strategies for desktops. It's just not how it is done, it is not practical.
Yep. Even at a small scale if you really wanted this all you need is 1 VL of windows that you are using (as long as the computers are licesned for the same version or newer that has downgrade rights [must be same edition which is going to be Pro]) and 1 server that you can set up WDS on. And if you don't have more than 2 people doing the imaging you shouldn't need more than the 2 administrative cals windows comes with.
Wow, talk about nearly the most expensive way to go.
Really VL isn't worth it if you can't justify the 5 licenses required to get into VL in the first place. If you are a one man shop and don't need an onsite server, buying that server license $800+, two CALs $75+, Software Assurance for Windows desktop $175+, and a third CAL because it's the least expensive VL thing you can buy, you're looking at $1200.
You might be better off just buying a second identical computer and dropping an image on it from time to time from your main machine. -
The two CALs are free. Doesn't change the math, just saying.
-
@Dashrender said:
You might be better off just buying a second identical computer and dropping an image on it from time to time from your main machine.
Or actually syncing them in real time at that point!
-
@Dashrender said:
Really VL isn't worth it if you can't justify the 5 licenses required to get into VL in the first place. If you are a one man shop and don't need an onsite server, buying that server license $800+, two CALs $75+, Software Assurance for Windows desktop $175+, and a third CAL because it's the least expensive VL thing you can buy, you're looking at $1200.
You might be better off just buying a second identical computer and dropping an image on it from time to time from your main machine.Yes but apparently they don't care about making financially sound decisions.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
The two CALs are free. Doesn't change the math, just saying.
I don't understand, how are the two CALs free? Do you mean free as in unassigned?
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The two CALs are free. Doesn't change the math, just saying.
I don't understand, how are the two CALs free? Do you mean free as in unassigned?
Each server licences comes with two CALs for administrative purposes.
Server software licensed using CALs permits up to 2 users or devices to access the server software for the purposes of administration without CALs. However, if your administrators also use the software for anything other than administration (for example, they check their email), CALs will be required for them as well.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The two CALs are free. Doesn't change the math, just saying.
I don't understand, how are the two CALs free? Do you mean free as in unassigned?
You get two service accounts with the server. @jason mentioned it explicitly when he posted about it.
-
@Jason said:
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The two CALs are free. Doesn't change the math, just saying.
I don't understand, how are the two CALs free? Do you mean free as in unassigned?
Each server licences comes with two CALs for administrative purposes.
Server software licensed using CALs permits up to 2 users or devices to access the server software for the purposes of administration without CALs. However, if your administrators also use the software for anything other than administration (for example, they check their email), CALs will be required for them as well.
Actually, no - your quote specifically said permits up to 2 users or devices to access the server software for the purposes of administration without CALs
So I'm back to not seeing any free CALs
-
@Dashrender said:
So I'm back to not seeing any free CALs
You don't need to buy the CAL. That's the point.
-
@Jason said:
@Dashrender said:
So I'm back to not seeing any free CALs
You don't need to buy the CAL. That's the point.
Aww - OK I see where you're going with this. But I'd disagree. You do need the CAL if as in your example your point is to use the server as a WDS box. So that single user would need a CAL for WDS access, which is outside the normal administration of a server.
But that gets us back to
@scottalanmiller said:
The two CALs are free. Doesn't change the math, just saying.
Which is correct. You still need 5 Open Licenses to get a VL agreement in place, so the pricing doesn't change in your scenario (1 server, 1 workstation SA, 3 CALs).
If we were looking for the lowest cost option with VL, 1 workstation SA, 4 CALs, we're still at $475 vs $1200...depending on the business, might be worth it, maybe.. but probably not.
-
@Dashrender said:
Aww - OK I see where you're going with this. But I'd disagree. You do need the CAL if as in your example your point is to use the server as a WDS box. So that single user would need a CAL for WDS access, which is outside the normal administration of a server.
Depends on who you ask. Using WDS could be considered a purely administrative task.
-
I support around a 100 desktops and don't bother with imaging or backups. I don't worry about backups because I just don't find HP PCs fail on a regularly basis, so its simply not worth the effort of worrying about them. And the majority of users only use standard applications (Office basically), so I can setup a new HP PC, including installing Office and uninstalling HP bloatware, in about 20 minutes.
-
Holy cow. I drive to work, and there are 18 posts!
So, I am switching to the side of 100% agreeing with you in ALL business cases. Regardless of what you run, desktop re-imaging isn't necessarily the best way to go. I am just thinking of it as a convenience. I'm working at 12. I got lunch, and my laptop gets stolen. I pick up a new laptop on the way back from Best Buy and I am back up and running as I was at 12 pretty quickly.
But ... I store all my personal stuff on this laptop too, which makes me think me reticence here is machines only on a personal level. I guess I am really thinking of a personal level. Like your elderly uncle who has all their pictures and music on their machines, but aren't backing up.
Is it really just a matter of ... hey if it is important to them they should know better? Or ... hey if it is really that important, it's more than just a personal machine and should be considered as such?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
The answer here should be to move those critical data-storing apps elsewhere. To a server, to a hosted site... whatever. A high quality VPS starts at $5/mo. If the system isn't worth $5, it's not critical in the least.
Recommendation, for future storage ... in my brain?
-
@Dashrender said:
You are allowed to create images of each machine to be restored on the same hardware that the image came from.
If it works, which the home user cannot legally check.
-
What about bookmarks, things like that?
Again, I've taken this down to just the most basic of users. Your grandmother. The crazy guy who lives in the next apartments who knows you work with computers.
-
Recommend something like Crashplan... not instantaneous like you are expecting but the easiest way to do it.
-
@Dashrender said:
@Jason said:
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The two CALs are free. Doesn't change the math, just saying.
I don't understand, how are the two CALs free? Do you mean free as in unassigned?
Each server licences comes with two CALs for administrative purposes.
Server software licensed using CALs permits up to 2 users or devices to access the server software for the purposes of administration without CALs. However, if your administrators also use the software for anything other than administration (for example, they check their email), CALs will be required for them as well.
Actually, no - your quote specifically said permits up to 2 users or devices to access the server software for the purposes of administration without CALs
So I'm back to not seeing any free CALs
It's still a CAL because it is a client and a license to access.
