ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    GPO's for System Hardening

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    18 Posts 7 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ObsolesceO
      Obsolesce
      last edited by

      A hardened system doesn't use ADDS and Windows.

      PhlipElderP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • PhlipElderP
        PhlipElder @Obsolesce
        last edited by PhlipElder

        @obsolesce said in GPO's for System Hardening:

        A hardened system doesn't use ADDS and Windows.

        The subject says "GPO's ... "?

        GPO = Group Policy Object

        GPOs are linked to OUs.

        OU = Organization Unit

        Jeremy Moskowitz is one of the preeminent Group Policy folks in the world. One of the best to learn from. His books a really, really good.

        ADDS and Group Policy are still very much relevant today.

        EDIT: PAW is not a part of the production domain. It's either workgroup or in a separate AD Forest (Host/Tenant type of AD structure).

        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @ElecEng
          last edited by

          Don't have any printers on this network BTW

          What weird place do you work? I want to work there!

          EddieJenningsE E 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • EddieJenningsE
            EddieJennings @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @dashrender said in GPO's for System Hardening:

            Don't have any printers on this network BTW

            What weird place do you work? I want to work there!

            This. 100% this :P.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @PhlipElder
              last edited by

              @phlipelder said in GPO's for System Hardening:

              EDIT: PAW is not a part of the production domain. It's either workgroup or in a separate AD Forest (Host/Tenant type of AD structure).

              What do you mean?

              PhlipElderP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • PhlipElderP
                PhlipElder @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @dashrender said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                @phlipelder said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                EDIT: PAW is not a part of the production domain. It's either workgroup or in a separate AD Forest (Host/Tenant type of AD structure).

                What do you mean?

                PAW: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-center-security/privileged-access-workstation-paw/ba-p/372274

                We treat all production environments as hostile now.

                So, when we deploy a new cluster it goes into its own AD Forest with its own DCs running at the local level on a couple of cluster nodes (Hyper-V).

                A dedicated PAW or Jump Server could be set up in that AD Forest.

                Otherwise, it should be in a workgroup and have 2FA/MFA set up.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  ElecEng @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @dashrender It is a manufacturing network for equipment comms, etc. Printers are on the corporate network but both networks are isolated from each other. Very common.

                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @ElecEng
                    last edited by

                    @eleceng said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                    Very common.

                    Sadly not.

                    E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • E
                      ElecEng @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @jaredbusch That is the correct way and the way it's done in most manufacturing plants in the U.S. and International. That has been best practice for the last 25-30 years. I am in 8-10 different manufacturing plants [per week as a consultant and that's how it done.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @ElecEng
                        last edited by

                        @eleceng said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                        @jaredbusch That is the correct way and the way it's done in most manufacturing plants in the U.S. and International. That has been best practice for the last 25-30 years. I am in 8-10 different manufacturing plants [per week as a consultant and that's how it done.

                        That's awesome that the plants you work for do it that way - but I agree with JB - it's likely not that common in reality.

                        Hell - the sure number of SCADA systems on the internet in mind boggling.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post