ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    remote accessscreenconnectmeshcentralmeshcentral 2connectwise controlconnectwise
    980 Posts 39 Posters 255.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      And now 0.2.9-i

      Doing the updates now.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • black3dynamiteB
        black3dynamite
        last edited by

        Has this happen to any of you ?
        If this happens again, I'll be submitting a ticket.

        -------- 2/27/2019, 8:57:46 AM ---- 0.2.9-h --------
        
        
        /opt/meshcentral/node_modules/mongodb/lib/mongo_client.js:421
                  throw err
                  ^
        MongoError: failed to connect to server [127.0.0.1:27017] on first connect [MongoError: connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:27017]
            at Pool. (/opt/meshcentral/node_modules/mongodb-core/lib/topologies/server.js:336:35)
            at Pool.emit (events.js:182:13)
            at Connection. (/opt/meshcentral/node_modules/mongodb-core/lib/connection/pool.js:280:12)
            at Object.onceWrapper (events.js:273:13)
            at Connection.emit (events.js:182:13)
            at Socket. (/opt/meshcentral/node_modules/mongodb-core/lib/connection/connection.js:189:49)
            at Object.onceWrapper (events.js:273:13)
            at Socket.emit (events.js:182:13)
            at emitErrorNT (internal/streams/destroy.js:82:8)
            at emitErrorAndCloseNT (internal/streams/destroy.js:50:3)
        Emitted 'error' event at:
            at /opt/meshcentral/node_modules/mongojs/lib/database.js:31:16
            at connectCallback (/opt/meshcentral/node_modules/mongodb/lib/mongo_client.js:527:5)
            at /opt/meshcentral/node_modules/mongodb/lib/mongo_client.js:418:11
            at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:61:11)
        
        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
          last edited by

          @black3dynamite No, have not seen that.

          But the error appears to be from MongoDB not responding, not from MeshCentral.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            I've seen the error with NodeBB when MongoDB's Atlas service went down.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              Just went to 0.2.9-k

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                Running MC on 2019 end points now and it is noticeably way faster there than on 2012 R2, for example.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  0.2.9-o

                  We couldn't update earlier today. Our MC install was getting quite a lot of use. Thanks to MC we were able to do a degree of work that we could never have done with SC due to its connection limits and performance overhead. MC worked like a champ.

                  DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                    0.2.9-o

                    We couldn't update earlier today. Our MC install was getting quite a lot of use. Thanks to MC we were able to do a degree of work that we could never have done with SC due to its connection limits and performance overhead. MC worked like a champ.

                    The licensing thing I could see - but really - MC is that much better on performance overhead?

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                      0.2.9-o

                      We couldn't update earlier today. Our MC install was getting quite a lot of use. Thanks to MC we were able to do a degree of work that we could never have done with SC due to its connection limits and performance overhead. MC worked like a champ.

                      The licensing thing I could see - but really - MC is that much better on performance overhead?

                      Yeah, needs a fraction of the resources and even with heavier use allows us to connect in under a quarter of the time. It makes us dramatically more responsive as the support team.

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                        @Dashrender said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                        0.2.9-o

                        We couldn't update earlier today. Our MC install was getting quite a lot of use. Thanks to MC we were able to do a degree of work that we could never have done with SC due to its connection limits and performance overhead. MC worked like a champ.

                        The licensing thing I could see - but really - MC is that much better on performance overhead?

                        Yeah, needs a fraction of the resources and even with heavier use allows us to connect in under a quarter of the time. It makes us dramatically more responsive as the support team.

                        It is working pretty good at this point for me, but it is missing a couple things I require for full use.

                        I have one client that requires consent before letting the connection run.

                        I have other clients that are only comfortable with the always on connection because they are alerted that we are connected by the task icon and or the notice banner at the top, and or the black background.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • YlianY
                          Ylian
                          last edited by

                          Good input. Working on a few big ticket items right now (Agent update recovery and Intel AMT CCM activation), but user notification & consent is a frequently asked feature. Will try to give it a first go at it next week.

                          scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @Ylian
                            last edited by

                            @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                            user notification & consent is a frequently asked feature

                            Yeah, that's really big.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @Ylian
                              last edited by

                              @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                              Will try to give it a first go at it next week.

                              Awesome, thanks.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                0.2.9-x is out. Doing updates now.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                  0.2.9-x is out. Doing updates now.

                                  Just up to 0.2.9-z now.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • FATeknollogeeF
                                    FATeknollogee
                                    last edited by

                                    What's the trick to copy/paste?

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • FATeknollogeeF
                                      FATeknollogee
                                      last edited by

                                      The "open web address on remote PC" will work for now.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        JasGot @notverypunny
                                        last edited by

                                        @notverypunny said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                        @scottalanmiller I can't speak to the Linux agent, but the windows one offers a connect button that does a 1 time connection without installing. Better than team viewer as it pops in the tech console instead of having to get a user id an pw from the user

                                        I haven't seen this connect button, can you elaborate a bit so I can check it out? Thanks.

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @JasGot
                                          last edited by

                                          @JasGot said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                          @notverypunny said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                          @scottalanmiller I can't speak to the Linux agent, but the windows one offers a connect button that does a 1 time connection without installing. Better than team viewer as it pops in the tech console instead of having to get a user id an pw from the user

                                          I haven't seen this connect button, can you elaborate a bit so I can check it out? Thanks.

                                          Not much to say. When you run the installer it fires up a little window that offers "install" or "connect". Choose connect and it gives you an immediate, uninstalled connection that goes away when you are done.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                                            last edited by

                                            @FATeknollogee said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                            What's the trick to copy/paste?

                                            Very high on my list of "wants".

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 48
                                            • 49
                                            • 7 / 49
                                            • First post
                                              Last post