ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Leaflet Review

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Business
    21 Posts 5 Posters 1.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • CloudKnightC
      CloudKnight @RojoLoco
      last edited by

      @rojoloco - No problem, I appreciate the feedback, this is important, I want it to be correct.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • CloudKnightC
        CloudKnight @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @jaredbusch Any Feedback Jared, I know you are a honest critique lol.

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @CloudKnight
          last edited by

          @stuartjordan said in Leaflet Review:

          @jaredbusch Any Feedback Jared, I know you are a honest critique lol.

          content I'm not seeing problems with.. but yeha.. do not ask me to spot grammar and shit.. nope...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @RojoLoco
            last edited by

            @rojoloco said in Leaflet Review:

            Why is "16 years' experience" written as a possessive? No apostrophe needed there.

            It works either way in this case. This is a weird one. It can be "16 years (plural) of experience" or "the experience belonging to 16 years". Both are legitimate ways to interpret the stated phrase, one would be written with the apostrophe and one without. I agree that without is better, but technically with is just fine. Without it, there is an implied "of", with it, it is correct as is.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              "Within the Essex County." A very pretentious county indeed. I'm guessing the word "area" used to follow there and was removed and the sentence was not updated.

              RojoLocoR CloudKnightC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                "Excess of 350+".

                That's redundant. "Excess of 350" or "350+".

                CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RojoLocoR
                  RojoLoco @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Leaflet Review:

                  "Within the Essex County." A very pretentious county indeed. I'm guessing the word "area" used to follow there and was removed and the sentence was not updated.

                  I skipped over that one on purpose.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • CloudKnightC
                    CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller Thanks Scott, should I take the "+" out of 350?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • CloudKnightC
                      CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in Leaflet Review:

                      "Within the Essex County." A very pretentious county indeed. I'm guessing the word "area" used to follow there and was removed and the sentence was not updated.

                      Do you think this should be "located in the Essex County" rather then "Within"?

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @CloudKnight
                        last edited by

                        @stuartjordan said in Leaflet Review:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Leaflet Review:

                        "Within the Essex County." A very pretentious county indeed. I'm guessing the word "area" used to follow there and was removed and the sentence was not updated.

                        Do you think this should be "located in the Essex County" rather then "Within"?

                        It's the "the" that is the issue.

                        Is it "Within Essex County" or is it "Withing the Essex County area"? The "the" only makes sense if the "area" or "region" is tacked on at the end.

                        CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • CloudKnightC
                          CloudKnight
                          last edited by

                          Thanks @JaredBusch -

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • CloudKnightC
                            CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller County is like the u.s equivalent to state I believe. So it would be like, "Located Within the Texas State" - that's what I'm trying to mean.

                            RojoLocoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • RojoLocoR
                              RojoLoco @CloudKnight
                              last edited by

                              @stuartjordan said in Leaflet Review:

                              @scottalanmiller County is like the u.s equivalent to state I believe. So it would be like, "Located Within the Texas State" - that's what I'm trying to mean.

                              Nobody here would ever say "located within the texas state". Drop that "the". It would be "located within the state of texas".

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • CloudKnightC
                                CloudKnight
                                last edited by

                                Much Appreciated everyone, always good to get opinions and comments.
                                I'm quite happy with the design though, looks modern and fresh.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • thwrT
                                  thwr
                                  last edited by

                                  I don't know how ads work where you are, but I would keep it way simpler. It looks like a ... how to say, it's like a chef brought you everything he found in his kitchen which might be somehow eatable, no matter what.

                                  As for me, I wouldn't call a (small) company which offers phenomenal webdesign and (qualified) network security audits at the same time. I'm sure you're doing a really good job, but what is the core of your business? What are the top - let's say five - things people know your company for? Probably not webdesign 😉

                                  CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • CloudKnightC
                                    CloudKnight @thwr
                                    last edited by

                                    @thwr Points taken on board, thanks thwr 🙂

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 1 / 2
                                    • First post
                                      Last post