I can't even
-
-
click all the carrots!
-
How is this person in charge of designing the system without any freaking clue about where the hypervisor is installed too, what the array configuration should look like and lastly what and why an OBR is better than splitting arrays!
Already has an in depth BA, but come on . . .
-
And considering RAID5 for 3-4TB of data.....
Why not RAID1 with a meager 2 drives.....
-
Anyone know this guy? Saw him begging for upvotes
-
-
dd a live system to make it a VM and is okay with data corruption so long as he can get the VM to boot.
hahaha.. . . .
It's just a freaking mad house. . .
-
@DustinB3403 said in I can't even:
dd a live system to make it a VM and is okay with data corruption so long as he can get the VM to boot.
hahaha.. . . .
It's just a freaking mad house. . .
dd? Would use rsync for this, so a file-level copy, not a bit-copy.
-
@TAHIN said in I can't even:
- Slow printing? Try using a more slippery type of paper.
Where's curtis?
-
So another quote from Dell and HP, and moderators trying to squelch relavent information regarding the pricing and provided quotes.
For a meager 8.4TB, yeah you need a SAN!
Um SW mods, get realistic, asking a question of how something is to be configured and planned usage is directly in line with the topic.
Nothing was brought up about the IPOD design being quoted, nor the horrible concept that needing a meager 8.4TB of storage requires a SAN.
Just the question of how is the SAN planned for. . . like get off your high horse.
-
@DustinB3403 if you feel that there is a bad moderation, send it to Sean. He's gotten a lot of complaints filed this week, and that this was being planned for is one of them. Not knowing what exactly was moderated, it's hard to know what the grounds might have been.
-
@scottalanmiller Even the OP doesn't know why replies were deleted from the topic.
-
Tagging @Jimmy9008
-
@DustinB3403 wow, that seems like someone got pretty overzealous there.
-
That moderator is over zealous.
I mean look at this:
I queried it and kept asking if he was serious...he was. He could not see 1 drop of sarcasm in my post.
-
Because of the systemic derailment of topics in Virtualization and Storage, they have their own terms, and they are rigorously enforced. For better or for worse, that is what is the standard.
-
@Kelly said in I can't even:
Because of the systemic derailment of topics in Virtualization and Storage, they have their own terms, and they are rigorously enforced. For better or for worse, that is what is the standard.
Well, new as of this week. Storage just put them in. And that they don't match the rest of the site is a bit of a problem as you have to just "know" that there are special terms run independently. If the special terms were valid, why aren't they used in the rest of the site? Clearly there is disagreement as to who is in charge and if the terms are good or bad. They are also, and this is my specific complaint, not easily determined and are 100% at the whim and personal preference of the just a few people.
-
@Kelly said in I can't even:
Because of the systemic derailment of topics in Virtualization and Storage, they have their own terms, and they are rigorously enforced. For better or for worse, that is what is the standard.
Where are these specific sub-category rules listed? I've never been directed to them to review. I would likely look at them like I do at odd state law, which contradicts federal law.
"Yep I'm ignoring that one"
-
@Kelly said in I can't even:
Because of the systemic derailment of topics in Virtualization and Storage, they have their own terms,...
That's one of the issues.... it's not agreed upon that threads are derailed. I've been complaining about the mod in question who made the derailment rules for derailments, in fact. What is and is not a derailment is not a clear thing. Like today, some mod felt that things were derailed, but the OP did not. So which is correct? Everyone has their own opinion as to what constitutes derailment. It's less that the threads there get derailed more than elsewhere, it's more that the mods there have a more aggressive opinion of what is derailment. But it is also that those are discussion areas that are broad, complex and poorly understood in the SMB market so the need for broader thinking and probing is far more important than, say, in an Exchange group where people tend to be deploying in standard, predictable ways that don't put them at risk most of the time.
-
@DustinB3403 said in I can't even:
@Kelly said in I can't even:
Because of the systemic derailment of topics in Virtualization and Storage, they have their own terms, and they are rigorously enforced. For better or for worse, that is what is the standard.
Where are these specific sub-category rules listed, I've never been directed to them to review. I would likely look at them like I do at odd state law, which contradicts federal law.
"Yep I'm ignoring that one"
They are just posts in those groups. They are problematic because responding to a question doesn't mean that you are "hanging out" in that group. For many of us, there really aren't groups. We just answer questions. And what if a questions moves in or out of a group... the rules as to what is good posting changes. In one case, you are providing information that is not allowed. But move it to a different category and not providing that information would be unprofessional and setting someone up for failure. So it's a really weird situation. And how you are supposed to know to read some new rules, by a lone mod, posted as a thread, that don't agree with the SW rules, when responding to any given post ... I have no idea. And it means that with hundreds of unique groups, each is open to make it's own rules now. It's like hundreds of loosely associated communities, now.
