What Are You Doing Right Now
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Though the insurance thing do it, but why would drive the prices of insurance up?
Insurance on self driving will plummet as there is almost never a fault to pay out on. Insurance for those intentionally being risky will skyrocket as there is less and less excuse for it.
I am expecting self driving cars to start including the insurance, did you see Volvo's new "Care" plan.
Still cant figure out if its financing or just a rental agreement...
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Though the insurance thing do it, but why would drive the prices of insurance up?
Insurance on self driving will plummet as there is almost never a fault to pay out on. Insurance for those intentionally being risky will skyrocket as there is less and less excuse for it.
yeah, this will definitely happen, but I think it will still take over 10 years from the time self driving cars hit the road in mass numbers, if not longer.
Of course, I hope to be completely wrong on that - I yearn for the self driving future! -
At not-required-but-required company board game night.
-
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
The self-driving car revolution can't come soon enough.
tell me about it.
Well, the Lidar sensors are generally quite expensive still. While some companies claim to have solved that issue, getting a machine learning platform to learn all the nuances involved in operating a multi-ton object safely still seems to be a challenge
The probable worse issue is getting the cars to anticipate what crazy humans will do.
That's why we need to outlaw the dangerous pieces and just keep the safe ones. They've already shown that the track record thus far is that ALL accidents are being caused by humans.
Sadly, people feel that their rights are being taken away by not being allowed to drive.
Who believes they have a right to drive? I've never seen that claimed. The whole licensing processes kind of goes against that.
Try taking the keys from your elderly parent when its unsafe for them to drive but they don't see it that way.
Exactly - though this is not exactly the same. At least in the city - making all cars self driving doesn't keep you locked at home. If anything it's more freeing for a person.
We have somewhat had that ever since taxis have existed. You're just paying somebody else to do the driving for you.
Yes and no. In today's world, you often own a car
You have to have the original copy of the MSO to actually own a vehicle. I know of 4 vehicles (all owned by the same family), that can actually prove private ownership. The title you get from the state is proving the state owns the vehicle you happen to drive.
So, yes, you have a point, but 99.9% of vehicles are owned the state of original sale, not us.
-
Working on Restoring Amazon Kindle Fires.
-
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
The self-driving car revolution can't come soon enough.
tell me about it.
Well, the Lidar sensors are generally quite expensive still. While some companies claim to have solved that issue, getting a machine learning platform to learn all the nuances involved in operating a multi-ton object safely still seems to be a challenge
The probable worse issue is getting the cars to anticipate what crazy humans will do.
That's why we need to outlaw the dangerous pieces and just keep the safe ones. They've already shown that the track record thus far is that ALL accidents are being caused by humans.
Sadly, people feel that their rights are being taken away by not being allowed to drive.
Who believes they have a right to drive? I've never seen that claimed. The whole licensing processes kind of goes against that.
Try taking the keys from your elderly parent when its unsafe for them to drive but they don't see it that way.
Exactly - though this is not exactly the same. At least in the city - making all cars self driving doesn't keep you locked at home. If anything it's more freeing for a person.
We have somewhat had that ever since taxis have existed. You're just paying somebody else to do the driving for you.
Yes and no. In today's world, you often own a car
You have to have the original copy of the MSO to actually own a vehicle. I know of 4 vehicles (all owned by the same family), that can actually prove private ownership. The title you get from the state is proving the state owns the vehicle you happen to drive.
So, yes, you have a point, but 99.9% of vehicles are owned the state of original sale, not us.
Having to pay taxes on things, having titles, registration and such doesn't change who owns it.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
The self-driving car revolution can't come soon enough.
tell me about it.
Well, the Lidar sensors are generally quite expensive still. While some companies claim to have solved that issue, getting a machine learning platform to learn all the nuances involved in operating a multi-ton object safely still seems to be a challenge
The probable worse issue is getting the cars to anticipate what crazy humans will do.
That's why we need to outlaw the dangerous pieces and just keep the safe ones. They've already shown that the track record thus far is that ALL accidents are being caused by humans.
Sadly, people feel that their rights are being taken away by not being allowed to drive.
Who believes they have a right to drive? I've never seen that claimed. The whole licensing processes kind of goes against that.
Try taking the keys from your elderly parent when its unsafe for them to drive but they don't see it that way.
Exactly - though this is not exactly the same. At least in the city - making all cars self driving doesn't keep you locked at home. If anything it's more freeing for a person.
We have somewhat had that ever since taxis have existed. You're just paying somebody else to do the driving for you.
Yes and no. In today's world, you often own a car
You have to have the original copy of the MSO to actually own a vehicle. I know of 4 vehicles (all owned by the same family), that can actually prove private ownership. The title you get from the state is proving the state owns the vehicle you happen to drive.
So, yes, you have a point, but 99.9% of vehicles are owned the state of original sale, not us.
Having to pay taxes on things, having titles, registration and such doesn't change who owns it.
And what does any of that have to do with anything I stated?
-
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@travisdh1 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
The self-driving car revolution can't come soon enough.
tell me about it.
Well, the Lidar sensors are generally quite expensive still. While some companies claim to have solved that issue, getting a machine learning platform to learn all the nuances involved in operating a multi-ton object safely still seems to be a challenge
The probable worse issue is getting the cars to anticipate what crazy humans will do.
That's why we need to outlaw the dangerous pieces and just keep the safe ones. They've already shown that the track record thus far is that ALL accidents are being caused by humans.
Sadly, people feel that their rights are being taken away by not being allowed to drive.
Who believes they have a right to drive? I've never seen that claimed. The whole licensing processes kind of goes against that.
Try taking the keys from your elderly parent when its unsafe for them to drive but they don't see it that way.
Exactly - though this is not exactly the same. At least in the city - making all cars self driving doesn't keep you locked at home. If anything it's more freeing for a person.
We have somewhat had that ever since taxis have existed. You're just paying somebody else to do the driving for you.
Yes and no. In today's world, you often own a car
You have to have the original copy of the MSO to actually own a vehicle. I know of 4 vehicles (all owned by the same family), that can actually prove private ownership. The title you get from the state is proving the state owns the vehicle you happen to drive.
So, yes, you have a point, but 99.9% of vehicles are owned the state of original sale, not us.
Having to pay taxes on things, having titles, registration and such doesn't change who owns it.
And what does any of that have to do with anything I stated?
What makes you feel that you don't own your car?
-
MCO is just paperwork and isn't ownership. We know any website talking about that isn't talking about actual real world ownership. States don't keep those either. If MCO / MSO was required to own something, then cars can't be owned at all, which is obviously a silly concept.
-
Here is an easy test of car ownership to see if a state, federal government, or you own a car....
Can you drive it out of the country to Canada or Mexico? Can you sell it while there? If the answers are yes, you are the owner of the car.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Here is an easy test of car ownership to see if a state, federal government, or you own a car....
Can you drive it out of the country to Canada or Mexico? Can you sell it while there? If the answers are yes, you are the owner of the car.
Yeah, all those old American muscle cars in Japan are totally still owned by the state.
Also forget another country. What about another state. That basically is another country. I guess I don’t own my second hand 2010 Honda Insight registered in Illinois. That was originally sold in New Jersey and registered in New York.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
MCO is just paperwork and isn't ownership. We know any website talking about that isn't talking about actual real world ownership. States don't keep those either. If MCO / MSO was required to own something, then cars can't be owned at all, which is obviously a silly concept.
Isn't the MCO/MSO specifically for tariff purposes and has nothing to do with the end user? Seems odd to require a tax document to prove ownership.
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
MCO is just paperwork and isn't ownership. We know any website talking about that isn't talking about actual real world ownership. States don't keep those either. If MCO / MSO was required to own something, then cars can't be owned at all, which is obviously a silly concept.
Isn't the MCO/MSO specifically for tariff purposes and has nothing to do with the end user? Seems odd to require a tax document to prove ownership.
Correct, it's just manufacturing legal documentation. Has nothing to do with ownership. And even the states don't keep them, so obviously they can't be part of the ownership.
-
Just updated Snipe-IT to the newest release and I'm attempting to get the google-api to work the way it shows here.
Everything is added into my .env so I'm not sure what is going on. .
-
Spinning up a Fedora VM to install redis to see if I can configure it to match what's currently installed on production. End goal = no long run redis on production in a Windows VM.
-
On a consulting call.
-
Just posted instructions on how to get a dynamic extension list out of FreePBX and into a remote address book on Yealink phones.
-
Discovering the "Double Hop" problem with trying to access network shares from a server to which I have entered a PowerShell remoting session.
-
Just got my first bill from BackBlaze. Been using this to store important IT docs, but I guess I wasn't at a chargeable amount of data before this. Recently ive been uploading vm exports there.
$0.07 for November 5 - Dec 4! -
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Discovering the "Double Hop" problem with trying to access network shares from a server to which I have entered a PowerShell remoting session.
Ran
Enable-WsManCredSSP -Role Serveron my hyper-v server. Problem solved.
