ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Are You Doing Right Now

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Water Closet
    time waster
    88.9k Posts 285 Posters 43.3m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403 @MattSpeller
      last edited by

      @mattspeller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

      I'm stuck in a meeting for the next hour with a whole leg of my boxers wedged firmly in my butt crack. There is no escape. There is no fixing it. There is only suffering.

      Make others suffer with you and give everyone atomic wedgies.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • MattSpellerM
        MattSpeller
        last edited by

        feadab02f0bfc24b5e06fc0f88f928a0a5c4efb157239ea4dbd7925134ae7670.jpg

        dbeatoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
        • PenguinWranglerP
          PenguinWrangler @coliver
          last edited by

          @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

          @dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

          @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

          It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.

          is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?

          You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.

          As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.

          coliverC scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • coliverC
            coliver @PenguinWrangler
            last edited by

            @penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

            @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

            @dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

            @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

            It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.

            is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?

            You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.

            As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.

            Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.

            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @PenguinWrangler
              last edited by

              @penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

              @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

              @dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

              @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

              It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.

              is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?

              You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.

              As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.

              Exactly why I was so confused. how is that not working? He's asking for all this info, but doesn't have any info on what was tried or why it failed.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @coliver
                last edited by

                @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                @penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                @dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.

                is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?

                You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.

                As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.

                Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.

                The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.

                Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .

                coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  We've got the "can't get to the store, car won't move" problem, but we are all wondering if he has opened teh garage door yet.

                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                    We've got the "can't get to the store, car won't move" problem, but we are all wondering if he has opened teh garage door yet.

                    The car would happily move through a garage door. . .

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • coliverC
                      coliver @DustinB3403
                      last edited by coliver

                      @dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                      @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                      @penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                      @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                      @dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                      @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                      It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.

                      is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?

                      You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.

                      As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.

                      Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.

                      The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.

                      Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .

                      Understood, I think @Dashrender was assuming it worked similar to how SMB shares work on an AD domain with a Windows client. Where it authenticates in the background.

                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @coliver
                        last edited by DustinB3403

                        @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        @dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        @penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        @dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.

                        is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?

                        You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.

                        As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.

                        Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.

                        The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.

                        Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .

                        Understood, I think @Dashrender was assuming it worked similar to how SMB shares work on an AD domain with a Windows client. Where it authenticates in the background.

                        On every linux system I've used credentials still had to be provided explicitly for that connection.

                        Edit: I've only connected to windows shares a few times (so take it for what its worth)

                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @penguinwrangler said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          It's odd because, for Linux, being on a domain doesn't make sharing files between them easier. For the use case listed it would add near zero benefit.

                          is that true? If a Linux box is part of a domain, it's not easier to map a SMB share? i.e. don't need to provide credentials when making the connection?

                          You'd still have provide credentials. It makes no part of the mapping easier, at least to my knowledge.

                          As long as there is SSH enabled, you have sftp between the Pis themselves and you can do that on Windows Boxes with something like Filezilla. Don't even need to map or "setup" shares.

                          Correct, I think @Dashrender and I were talking about SMB shares though.

                          The share type doesn't matter, you still have to authenticate to it, proving you are the person / system that has access to the share.

                          Unless of course you're using anonymous access. . .

                          Understood, I think @Dashrender was assuming it worked similar to how SMB shares work on an AD domain with a Windows client. Where it authenticates in the background.

                          On every linux system I've used credentials still had to be provided explicitly for that connection.

                          That was my point. You hit the nail on the head.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • RojoLocoR
                            RojoLoco
                            last edited by

                            Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....

                            https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention

                            coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • EddieJenningsE
                              EddieJennings
                              last edited by

                              Looking at ATA devices.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • coliverC
                                coliver @RojoLoco
                                last edited by

                                @rojoloco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....

                                https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention

                                WTF does any of that mean? Outside of random rambling.

                                EddieJenningsE RojoLocoR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • EddieJenningsE
                                  EddieJennings @coliver
                                  last edited by

                                  @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                  @rojoloco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                  Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....

                                  https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention

                                  WTF does any of that mean? Outside of random rambling.

                                  Sounds like a Loomis Simmons special.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • DustinB3403D
                                    DustinB3403
                                    last edited by

                                    I've commented.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • RojoLocoR
                                      RojoLoco @coliver
                                      last edited by

                                      @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                      @rojoloco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                      Hmmm.... sounds totally legit. Especially the part where I get to pay for my own travel to/from Savannah, GA....

                                      https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2075696-seeking-business-partner-for-product-invention

                                      WTF does any of that mean? Outside of random rambling.

                                      "Act now and we'll throw in the Caribbean vacation ABSOLUTELY FREEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!"

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • gjacobseG
                                        gjacobse
                                        last edited by

                                        It's not often that you get to see video like this.. but holy crow. This is here,... just south of me. Can't imagine what the driver of the mini van / SUV thought as they hit plywood and went for a leap... YIKES!

                                        http://www.wkyt.com/content/news/Deadly-crash-caught-on-surveillance-camrera-452515543.html

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • EddieJenningsE
                                          EddieJennings
                                          last edited by

                                          Finally getting around to reading about Zabbix. Yum 🙂

                                          dbeatoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                          • dbeatoD
                                            dbeato @EddieJennings
                                            last edited by

                                            @eddiejennings That's a tasty subject 🙂 Have fun with it, it will be very helpful to you.

                                            EddieJenningsE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 4440
                                            • 4441
                                            • 4442
                                            • 4443
                                            • 4444
                                            • 4443 / 4444
                                            • First post
                                              Last post