@black3dynamite said in Converting VMware VMs to KVM: I haven't been keeping up with Windows Admin Center for awhile. Was that an option to manage Hyper-V? It will be, but I'm not sure that it is yet. We've tried and not been able to get it working even internally anywhere, let alone externally. Once they figure out stability and authentication, I assume that it will be great for that. Being that this is 2016, it's going to suck hard. And if there is a Hyper-V issue, WAC would be down which is a problem in a small environment like this.

@scottalanmiller I was considering rolling them back to last night as a last-ditch scenario is all fails since it is on Veeam and I have a Full from last night.

@wls-itguy said in VMWare 6.5 to 6.7...: @scottalanmiller said in VMWare 6.5 to 6.7...: @wls-itguy said in VMWare 6.5 to 6.7...: @scottalanmiller said in VMWare 6.5 to 6.7...: You download the latest KVM from Fedora. Problem solved. This answer is about as useful as the ones where the guy says he has to use IE/Edge due to corporate policy and someone answers "use Firefox, Problem Solved!" Right... both are WAY more useful than the assumed answer. Except you didn't mention a bad corporate policy demanding you have this issue, you just said you had a technical issue and an answer was given. Actually I was just confused as to why you couldn't upgrade to 6.7 from 6.5u2. I didn't see that 6.5u2 came out after 6.7. Yes, that mostly makes sense. Although still odd that there isn't an upgrade path either way. Very odd. That it came out after itself would not cause any issues. They would have known when creating it that it was going to break updates. So this remains a screw up either way. They could have made it not create a failure to update.

Glad that you figured it out.

It seemed like someone on the VMware forums had a similar issue, yet it wasn't resolved. https://communities.vmware.com/thread/574921 I can just suggest the most common solution of "reconfigure it and see if that helps".

@TheDeepStorage said in Deploying a 2-node StarWind VSAN Free for VMware ESXi 6.5: @hobbit666 said in Deploying a 2-node StarWind VSAN Free for VMware ESXi 6.5: Thanks just that I might have some kit becoming available but they are all different Dell models, just wondered if the Hard Drive space/RAID matched that would be OK for a test lab, e.g. R610, 64GB RAM with 4x 600GB SAS R410, 64GB RAM with 4x 600GB SAS Sounds like it will work just fine for a test lab, anyways, once you get down to testing, DM me and I'll get you in touch with an engineer, who will review your environment to make sure everything will work perfectly. See now I want to purchase more lab equipment to test this. . . .

I've tried to import the Multi-Tenant Director .ova into XS & convert the .ova into vhd & vhdx. It will not boot in XS or Hyper-V, I get a black screen. It boots in vmWare Workstation. Nakivo support says the .ova is ONLY for use in vmWare (not for XS)

@WLS-ITGuy No issues. Wasn't required to fsck after a reboot.

Not sure, and I'm not going to power up the old system to find out. New one is running fine. If I ever run in to a situation like that again, there are a lot more checks I would do.

Server is back online now. Bringing the files in one by one and making sure they had the right name seemed to do it.

@whizzard said in Adventures in Graceful VM Shutdown: How does the licensing work with multiple UPS? The answer is...it depends. If you want OpMonis to monitor multiple UPS devices and shutdown things gracefully, it can do that using a single license but will only allow one shutdown list and would begin shutting down things as soon as your predefined threshold is hit for any one of the monitored UPS devices. The other option is to get a second license of OpMonis to monitor the second UPS and have a dedicated shutdown list just for that UPS and its connected equipment.

@KOOLER said in The SMB Two Server Dilema, What to Do: @whizzard said in The SMB Two Server Dilema, What to Do: In scenarios such as these what would be the recommended backup approach: DAS, NAS, Backup Appliance, lower end server, removable disk storage, tapes (intentionally left out cloud)? Should be separate (physically!) entity non-related to your production cluster. Cheap NAS is OK. For the average scenario (and I really just mean average) it's Synology or ReadyNAS that I recommend. Easy, supported, cost effective, desktop or rackmount options, well known, good brands, nice features.

@Carnival-Boy said in ESXi Evaluation Period: I have recently downgraded from ESXi Essentials to ESXi Free simply by entering a different key. It's the same product. I'd say you moved between products. It's one product family, they are super similar, but are they the same product? Just semantics, but they are very different. XO Community and XOA are not the same product. But it's the same code.

Great job indeed !!

Veeam support is now from India

@LAH3385 might be good to start a thread and try to determine what your needs are before going down the path of technology. By the time you were asking this question, you were already in pretty deep assuming certain products, product categories and platform HA. We should start with a business needs analysis, use that to set goals and then use the goals to select technology approaches.

@scottalanmiller said: @IT-ADMIN said: really the way you write is very eloquent Thank you. you are welcome

@thecreativeone91 said: XenServer supports SD Card installs. Not sure about Xen XS is just a packaging of Xen. So anything XS supports, Xen has to have supported. Xen is completely flexible and can be used anyway that you want, it itself doesn't have the same concept of "supported" like XS does.

IOPS are the biggest concern really. But without anything like a database which really needs them, RAID 6 might be more than enough. Exchange wouldn't be a big concern as it is not IOPS heavy. RAID 10 is far better tuned for heavy writes, but if reads are the vast majority, RAID 6 will keep right up.