ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Virtualize Every Server

    Self Promotion
    7
    38
    11.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • art_of_shredA
      art_of_shred Banned @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @dafyre said:

      There's that, and then if the Host where your Veeam instance live burns out the RAID array, you have lost all of your backups, lol.

      That's the case if your array burns out virtualized or not.

      That's why you need replication and/or archival. SPOF for backups is never an "ok" thing.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
        last edited by

        @Carnival-Boy said:

        @scottalanmiller said:

        Okay, gotcha. So that's a major vote pro-virtualization then 🙂

        Maybe. I'd have to consider any licencing implications of separation.

        Even if you don't decide to do it, having additional options is a positive on its own. If needed, it is there in case.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          Carnival Boy
          last edited by Carnival Boy

          The only other server I still have physical is Hamachi. I virtualised it originally but it was very flaky so went physical, which is a pain.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            Carnival Boy
            last edited by

            Oh, and our PBX is physical.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
              last edited by

              @Carnival-Boy said:

              The only other server I still have physical is Hamachi. I virtualised it originally but it was very flaky so went physical, which is a pain.

              Is that a Hamachi Gateway? Like a hub and spoke VPN design?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                Carnival Boy
                last edited by

                Yes

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Cool, haven't used Hamachi in many years. They kept dropping support for things and we gave up on it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dafyreD
                    dafyre
                    last edited by

                    virtualize_all_the_things.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • C
                      Carnival Boy
                      last edited by

                      I'm starting to wonder if virtualising my firewall was such a good idea.

                      dafyreD ? PSX_DefectorP 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre @Carnival Boy
                        last edited by

                        @Carnival-Boy said:

                        I'm starting to wonder if virtualising my firewall was such a good idea.

                        What makes you say that?

                        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User @Carnival Boy
                          last edited by

                          @Carnival-Boy said:

                          I'm starting to wonder if virtualising my firewall was such a good idea.

                          Only reason to be concerned with a virtual firewall is if you have are putting, normal internal VMs, your Firewall and your DMZ External VMs all on one host, even then the risk is small.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • PSX_DefectorP
                            PSX_Defector @Carnival Boy
                            last edited by

                            @Carnival-Boy said:

                            I'm starting to wonder if virtualising my firewall was such a good idea.

                            Why? Every cloud provider does a VFW. Cisco's vASA is very kewl, especially in high density environments that I work in. Thousands of firewalls, all humming along.

                            Your little one off isn't that big of a deal. Just isolate and go for it.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • C
                              Carnival Boy @dafyre
                              last edited by

                              @dafyre said:

                              @Carnival-Boy said:

                              I'm starting to wonder if virtualising my firewall was such a good idea.

                              What makes you say that?

                              Because I need to power off my ESXi hosts this weekend remotely and I have no way of doing it as the firewall is running on one of the hosts. So I need to move the firewall onto a separate box, and if I'm going to do that, I'm not sure it's worth virtualising. I'd have to use a free ESXi licence, so I don't think Veeam would back it up, and it's fairly trivial to a fresh, bare metal install if disaster struck anyway.

                              ? scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @Carnival Boy
                                last edited by

                                @Carnival-Boy said:

                                Because I need to power off my ESXi hosts this weekend remotely and I have no way of doing it as the firewall is running on one of the hosts. So I need to move the firewall onto a separate box, and if I'm going to do that, I'm not sure it's worth virtualising. I'd have to use a free ESXi licence, so I don't think Veeam would back it up, and it's fairly trivial to a fresh, bare metal install if disaster struck anyway.

                                How can you not power them off remotely just because it's running as a VM, shutdown your other VMs, power off the Host the Firewall is on and let the VM gracefully shutdown during the host shutdown. Easy.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  Carnival Boy
                                  last edited by

                                  Oh ok, cool. For some reason I thought you had to put the host into maintenance mode before you can shut it down. I'm not quite sure what you mean by gracefully, though?

                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User @Carnival Boy
                                    last edited by

                                    @Carnival-Boy said:

                                    Oh ok, cool. For some reason I thought you had to put the host into maintenance mode before you can shut it down. I'm not quite sure what you mean by gracefully, though?

                                    It will ask you too but you do not have to do that, Maitenance mode is really for when you are just going to shut down one host and want the VMs to move over to another host first.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
                                      last edited by

                                      @Carnival-Boy said:

                                      @dafyre said:

                                      @Carnival-Boy said:

                                      I'm starting to wonder if virtualising my firewall was such a good idea.

                                      What makes you say that?

                                      Because I need to power off my ESXi hosts this weekend remotely and I have no way of doing it as the firewall is running on one of the hosts. So I need to move the firewall onto a separate box, and if I'm going to do that, I'm not sure it's worth virtualising. I'd have to use a free ESXi licence, so I don't think Veeam would back it up, and it's fairly trivial to a fresh, bare metal install if disaster struck anyway.

                                      One of the main points of the article is that consolidation is not part of the "always virtualize" discussion. Consolidation has many, many cases where it does not make sense. But the reasons to virtualize aren't dependent on consolidation - that's a separate concern.

                                      Also, if ESXi doesn't meet your needs, skip it. Just because ESXi has become rarely a good choice for virtualization doesn't mean that virtualization isn't a clear win, only that VMware is rarely a clear win. In fact, see my other post, VMware is now the virtualization that I would least likely recommend as it has basically no real advantages but many caveats. HyperV and XenServer would be 99% of the recommendations that I would make.

                                      One to one and HyperV or XenServer should solve all your issues.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DashrenderD
                                        Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        Without some sort of Remote Access he won't be able to power the VM host back on. Even if he had iDRAC, it wouldn't matter since his firewall will be down also, he's have no way to reach the iDRAC.

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender said:

                                          Without some sort of Remote Access he won't be able to power the VM host back on. Even if he had iDRAC, it wouldn't matter since his firewall will be down also, he's have no way to reach the iDRAC.

                                          Depends. In most datacenters they will have remote hands to do this or remote start out of band equipment that is another layer of OOB beyond what IPMI (ILO, DRAC, etc.) does so that even if your entire network is down you can still power on.

                                          DashrenderD ? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            @Dashrender said:

                                            Without some sort of Remote Access he won't be able to power the VM host back on. Even if he had iDRAC, it wouldn't matter since his firewall will be down also, he's have no way to reach the iDRAC.

                                            Depends. In most datacenters they will have remote hands to do this or remote start out of band equipment that is another layer of OOB beyond what IPMI (ILO, DRAC, etc.) does so that even if your entire network is down you can still power on.

                                            Sure, and I realize my post is in the wrong thread.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post