ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Simple comms. What to do?

    IT Discussion
    12
    16
    693
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      JasGot @gjacobse
      last edited by

      @gjacobse said in Simple comms. What to do?:

      @siringo

      I believe the easiest and fastest:

      Switch at the servers and fibre to the main switch. You may need to upgrade switch a, but it’s worth it.

      This is what we do.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • 1
        1337 @siringo
        last edited by

        @siringo said in Simple comms. What to do?:

        I have a site where the two main servers (Windows) are located about 15 'cable' metres from the switch (switch A) they plug into.

        Each server has 3 NICs.

        I'm wondering what others would do?

        Would you run 6 cables from the servers to switch A

        or

        place a switch (switch B) near the servers and run 1 cable from switch B to switch A?

        Thanks for any help.

        15 meters (50ft) is not very long. No need for another switch.

        The proper way IMHO is to set up a couple of patch panels. Use rackmounted if you have racks otherwise wall mounted.

        1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • 1
          1337 @1337
          last edited by 1337

          @pete-s said in Simple comms. What to do?:

          @siringo said in Simple comms. What to do?:

          I have a site where the two main servers (Windows) are located about 15 'cable' metres from the switch (switch A) they plug into.

          Each server has 3 NICs.

          I'm wondering what others would do?

          Would you run 6 cables from the servers to switch A

          or

          place a switch (switch B) near the servers and run 1 cable from switch B to switch A?

          Thanks for any help.

          15 meters (50ft) is not very long. No need for another switch.

          The proper way IMHO is to set up a couple of patch panels. Use rackmounted if you have racks otherwise wall mounted.

          Sorry if this is obvious. Just easier with a picture than text.
          4bbf8545-aa28-4e6b-a857-408a35fdfae6-image.png

          travisdh1T gotwfG 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @siringo
            last edited by

            @siringo said in Simple comms. What to do?:

            Would you run 6 cables from the servers to switch A
            or
            place a switch (switch B) near the servers and run 1 cable from switch B to switch A?

            Run cables. The fewer switches, the better.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @gjacobse
              last edited by

              @gjacobse said in Simple comms. What to do?:

              @siringo

              I believe the easiest and fastest:

              Switch at the servers and fibre to the main switch. You may need to upgrade switch a, but it’s worth it.

              Why is fiber involved? No distances here that make copper a challenge.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • dave247D
                dave247 @siringo
                last edited by dave247

                @siringo said in Simple comms. What to do?:

                I have a site where the two main servers (Windows) are located about 15 'cable' metres from the switch (switch A) they plug into.

                Each server has 3 NICs.

                I'm wondering what others would do?

                Would you run 6 cables from the servers to switch A

                or

                place a switch (switch B) near the servers and run 1 cable from switch B to switch A?

                Thanks for any help.

                If it's just two servers and there's no expectation for growth, I'd probably just run cables to the switches.

                In my server cage at work, we have a bunch of servers, so I have everything going to a 2-stack of switches (with dedicated UPS) and then fiber trunked to the main switch stack that everything else in our environment connects to. This helps keeps thing neat and clean with regards to cables in the server room and everything on the server LAN can still function if there is an outage somewhere else. It all depends on how you want to have it set up with regards to pricing, redundancy and availability.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • travisdh1T
                  travisdh1 @1337
                  last edited by

                  @pete-s said in Simple comms. What to do?:

                  @pete-s said in Simple comms. What to do?:

                  @siringo said in Simple comms. What to do?:

                  I have a site where the two main servers (Windows) are located about 15 'cable' metres from the switch (switch A) they plug into.

                  Each server has 3 NICs.

                  I'm wondering what others would do?

                  Would you run 6 cables from the servers to switch A

                  or

                  place a switch (switch B) near the servers and run 1 cable from switch B to switch A?

                  Thanks for any help.

                  15 meters (50ft) is not very long. No need for another switch.

                  The proper way IMHO is to set up a couple of patch panels. Use rackmounted if you have racks otherwise wall mounted.

                  Sorry if this is obvious. Just easier with a picture than text.
                  4bbf8545-aa28-4e6b-a857-408a35fdfae6-image.png

                  Everything that picture shows tells me you should have a single switch directly connected to the servers.

                  Do you have lots of devices not shown that use all the ports on all the switches? Even if you do, servers should still be connected to the first switch if at all possible.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • siringoS
                    siringo
                    last edited by

                    Thanks everyone for the comments & suggestions, it's been a great help.

                    Looks like I'm OK with cables.

                    Thanks again.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @gjacobse
                      last edited by

                      @gjacobse said in Simple comms. What to do?:

                      Switch at the servers and fibre to the main switch.

                      This is only useful if you have better than gigabit GBIC for the fiber. Otherwise it is no different than a cable.

                      Most likely hsi existing swithc cannot support anything better than gigabit GBIC.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • gotwfG
                        gotwf @1337
                        last edited by

                        @pete-s +1 on the patch panels and the catV back to main switch for low cost budget solution.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • jclambertJ
                          jclambert @siringo
                          last edited by jclambert

                          @siringo said in Simple comms. What to do?:

                          I have a site where the two main servers (Windows) are located about 15 'cable' metres from the switch (switch A) they plug into.

                          Each server has 3 NICs.

                          I'm wondering what others would do?

                          Would you run 6 cables from the servers to switch A

                          or

                          place a switch (switch B) near the servers and run 1 cable from switch B to switch A?

                          Thanks for any help.

                          Introducing new hardware (a switch) may be a stopgap, if the end intent running cables. Don't add a hardware failure point. Less is more as they say

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post