FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues

Dashrender

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

You might also be interested in the UMA concept, which in the USA is more commonly referred to as a General Access Network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_Access_Network

Yeah, no. I don’t want GAN because central network still.

bigbear

@dashrender said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

You might also be interested in the UMA concept, which in the USA is more commonly referred to as a General Access Network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_Access_Network

Yeah, no. I don’t want GAN because central network still.

It is for voice/voice application access over network API's, so that you can deliver guaranteed VOIP over a carrier network. So if I want to deliver reliable voice and E911 to a data only device, GAN (or truly VOLGA or UMA) provides me as an independent voice app provider the ability to do that.

If not carrier towers then what would you prefer?

bigbear

Also noticing Spectrum in my area is suddenly upgrading speeds to 200mb and even 400mb x 20mb for free! Just over the past week.

My dad got that UBNT Amplifi unit and the speedtest kept saying 200mb, so he thought it was wrong.

This all immediately following Net Neutrality bill? Whats the catch?

Dashrender

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@dashrender said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

You might also be interested in the UMA concept, which in the USA is more commonly referred to as a General Access Network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_Access_Network

Yeah, no. I don’t want GAN because central network still.

It is for voice/voice application access over network API's, so that you can deliver guaranteed VOIP over a carrier network.

If not carrier towers then what would you prefer?

Assuming I read it right, GAN is about the phone connecting over the internet.
So no tower involvement.

Please understand im talking about a situation I desire, not one that exist

bigbear

@dashrender said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@dashrender said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

You might also be interested in the UMA concept, which in the USA is more commonly referred to as a General Access Network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_Access_Network

Yeah, no. I don’t want GAN because central network still.

It is for voice/voice application access over network API's, so that you can deliver guaranteed VOIP over a carrier network.

If not carrier towers then what would you prefer?

Assuming I read it right, GAN is about the phone connecting over the internet.
So no tower involvement.

Please understand im talking about a situation I desire, not one that exist

Sounds like you would have been a fan of the old Signal lol... completely decentralized towers.

bigbear

@dashrender said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@dashrender said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

You might also be interested in the UMA concept, which in the USA is more commonly referred to as a General Access Network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_Access_Network

Yeah, no. I don’t want GAN because central network still.

It is for voice/voice application access over network API's, so that you can deliver guaranteed VOIP over a carrier network.

If not carrier towers then what would you prefer?

Assuming I read it right, GAN is about the phone connecting over the internet.
So no tower involvement.

Please understand im talking about a situation I desire, not one that exist

The positive about GAN/VoLGA/UMA is that you dont just have to provide best effort over the top OTT reliability. You can provide guarantee reliability across cellular and cable carriers.
'
This obsoletes the PSTN and allows any app to use its own signaling platform, the FCC refers to it as Nomadic VOIP.

For some reason its popular in Europe and not here though.Also wideband is very common in Europe where you are only likely to experience here with Facetime calls and on-network VolTE calls. (The crystal clear audio).

coliver

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

Also noticing Spectrum in my area is suddenly upgrading speeds to 200mb and even 400mb x 20mb for free! Just over the past week.

My dad got that UBNT Amplifi unit and the speedtest kept saying 200mb, so he thought it was wrong.

This all immediately following Net Neutrality bill? Whats the catch?

I've been seeing them advertising it like crazy.

wirestyle22

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

Also noticing Spectrum in my area is suddenly upgrading speeds to 200mb and even 400mb x 20mb for free! Just over the past week.

My dad got that UBNT Amplifi unit and the speedtest kept saying 200mb, so he thought it was wrong.

This all immediately following Net Neutrality bill? Whats the catch?

It's a Trojan horse right before they throttle all of your content. Either that or they think you're cute and are trying to butter you up.

bigbear

@wirestyle22 said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

Also noticing Spectrum in my area is suddenly upgrading speeds to 200mb and even 400mb x 20mb for free! Just over the past week.

My dad got that UBNT Amplifi unit and the speedtest kept saying 200mb, so he thought it was wrong.

This all immediately following Net Neutrality bill? Whats the catch?

It's a Trojan horse right before they throttle all of your content. Either that or they think you're cute and are trying to butter you up.

You know, my wifi has been crashing for the past 24 hours... its all just a conspiracy to sell more UBNT #deepstate

wirestyle22

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@wirestyle22 said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

Also noticing Spectrum in my area is suddenly upgrading speeds to 200mb and even 400mb x 20mb for free! Just over the past week.

My dad got that UBNT Amplifi unit and the speedtest kept saying 200mb, so he thought it was wrong.

This all immediately following Net Neutrality bill? Whats the catch?

It's a Trojan horse right before they throttle all of your content. Either that or they think you're cute and are trying to butter you up.

You know, my wifi has been crashing for the past 24 hours... its all just a conspiracy to sell more UBNT #deepstate

They just want to be physically connected with you

bigbear

@wirestyle22 said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@wirestyle22 said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

@bigbear said in FCC Net Neutrality Insanity Continues:

Also noticing Spectrum in my area is suddenly upgrading speeds to 200mb and even 400mb x 20mb for free! Just over the past week.

My dad got that UBNT Amplifi unit and the speedtest kept saying 200mb, so he thought it was wrong.

This all immediately following Net Neutrality bill? Whats the catch?

It's a Trojan horse right before they throttle all of your content. Either that or they think you're cute and are trying to butter you up.

You know, my wifi has been crashing for the past 24 hours... its all just a conspiracy to sell more UBNT #deepstate

They just want to be physically connected with you