ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website

    News
    security dreamhost
    12
    37
    3.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @DustinB3403
      last edited by

      @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

      @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

      @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

      even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

      Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

      True, but intent needs to be considered.

      I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

      Intent has nothing to do with possession laws.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • coliverC
        coliver @DustinB3403
        last edited by

        @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

        @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

        @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

        even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

        Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

        True, but intent needs to be considered.

        I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

        That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @coliver
          last edited by

          @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

          @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

          @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

          @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

          even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

          Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

          True, but intent needs to be considered.

          I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

          That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

          What makes something improvised rather than carefully planned?

          JaredBuschJ RojoLocoR coliverC 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            OMG he has an improvised explosive device!

            Citizen: oh no, I researched this and carefully made this with proper investigation and skill.

            Oh okay then, carry on.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

              @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

              @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

              @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

              @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

              even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

              Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

              True, but intent needs to be considered.

              I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

              That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

              What makes something improvised rather than carefully planned?

              non-improvised typically mean not put together yourself from raw materials.

              the exact definition varies by jurisdiction also.

              additionally non-improvised are also generally illegal.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

                Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

                True, but intent needs to be considered.

                I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

                That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

                What makes something improvised rather than carefully planned?

                non-improvised typically mean not put together yourself from raw materials.

                the exact definition varies by jurisdiction also.

                additionally non-improvised are also generally illegal.

                Seems like they'd just say "don't have bombs", then. 😉

                travisdh1T JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • travisdh1T
                  travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                  @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                  @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                  @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                  @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                  @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                  @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                  even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

                  Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

                  True, but intent needs to be considered.

                  I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

                  That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

                  What makes something improvised rather than carefully planned?

                  non-improvised typically mean not put together yourself from raw materials.

                  the exact definition varies by jurisdiction also.

                  additionally non-improvised are also generally illegal.

                  Seems like they'd just say "don't have bombs", then. 😉

                  Since when were people logical?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                    @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                    @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                    @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                    @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                    @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                    @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                    even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

                    Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

                    True, but intent needs to be considered.

                    I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

                    That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

                    What makes something improvised rather than carefully planned?

                    non-improvised typically mean not put together yourself from raw materials.

                    the exact definition varies by jurisdiction also.

                    additionally non-improvised are also generally illegal.

                    Seems like they'd just say "don't have bombs", then. 😉

                    law does not work that way. it has to be explicitly defined.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • RojoLocoR
                      RojoLoco @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                      @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                      @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                      @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                      @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                      even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

                      Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

                      True, but intent needs to be considered.

                      I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

                      That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

                      What makes something improvised rather than carefully planned?

                      If these guys are holding it, it's likely improvised...

                      0_1502832069859_whose-line-is-it-anyway-s8-20090619144016.jpg

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • coliverC
                        coliver @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                        @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                        @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                        @jaredbusch said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                        @dustinb3403 said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                        even making a pipe bomb isn't illegal.

                        Making it might not be, but possession of it may be depending on the jurisdiction.

                        True, but intent needs to be considered.

                        I might legitimately need a pipe bomb to break apart some concrete at my house.

                        That's not how that works. It depends on jurisdiction but possession of an improvised explosive device is illegal in most states.

                        What makes something improvised rather than carefully planned?

                        That's the term that's regularly used for things like pipebombs. It's part of our legal and social lexicon.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • CloudKnightC
                          CloudKnight
                          last edited by

                          I wonder how they would treat you if you have some malware code on your machine that your happen to be looking at, with no intention of being used.... I bet they would find something to prosecute you with?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • CloudKnightC
                            CloudKnight
                            last edited by

                            They would surely have to prove that you have intentions, innocent until proving guilty??

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • PenguinWranglerP
                              PenguinWrangler
                              last edited by PenguinWrangler

                              They want it to prove "Malice Aforethought" on the people that they arrested. That they planned, conspired, to do what they did.

                              NDCN scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • NDCN
                                NDC @PenguinWrangler
                                last edited by

                                @penguinwrangler said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                                They want it to prove "Malice Aforethought" on the people that they arrested. That they planned, conspired, to do what they did.

                                They don't need the records of 1.3 million users to have the information about the few people that were arrested and charged. The request is ludicrous.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @PenguinWrangler
                                  last edited by

                                  @penguinwrangler said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                                  They want it to prove "Malice Aforethought" on the people that they arrested. That they planned, conspired, to do what they did.

                                  I think just requesting these addresses shows malice aforethought.

                                  PenguinWranglerP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • PenguinWranglerP
                                    PenguinWrangler @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller While I think the scope of the request is a bit broad and has privacy concerns for other people not related to those arrested. I do not believe that there is an issue with the government trying to see if the people that were arrested did go to that website and did plan. It changes what charges and what sentencing can be rendered so it is pertinent to the case. I believe it should be a more narrow request than what it was.

                                    scottalanmillerS coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @PenguinWrangler
                                      last edited by

                                      @penguinwrangler said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                                      @scottalanmiller While I think the scope of the request is a bit broad and has privacy concerns for other people not related to those arrested. I do not believe that there is an issue with the government trying to see if the people that were arrested did go to that website and did plan. It changes what charges and what sentencing can be rendered so it is pertinent to the case. I believe it should be a more narrow request than what it was.

                                      Right, a narrow, appropriate request would be for the court case. This is not what a warrant related to the court case would look like.

                                      PenguinWranglerP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • coliverC
                                        coliver @PenguinWrangler
                                        last edited by coliver

                                        @penguinwrangler said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                                        @scottalanmiller While I think the scope of the request is a bit broad and has privacy concerns for other people not related to those arrested. I do not believe that there is an issue with the government trying to see if the people that were arrested did go to that website and did plan. It changes what charges and what sentencing can be rendered so it is pertinent to the case. I believe it should be a more narrow request than what it was.

                                        Why the broad application then? They could go backwards, ask for records for specific IP addresses, if they have someone arrested it should be "easy" to determine what there IP address was at the time. This is just governmental overreach.

                                        How many ISPs are handing out static IP addresses? I know TWC does but the local WISP and local DSL both use DHCP to allocate addresses to their customers.

                                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DashrenderD
                                          Dashrender @coliver
                                          last edited by

                                          @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                                          How many ISPs are handing out static IP addresses? I know TWC does but the local WISP and local DSL both use DHCP to allocate addresses to their customers.

                                          They may be DHCP, but how often do they really change? Cox uses DHCP for home users as well, but they change very infrequently.

                                          The next question is, is there any type of logging of what IP was given when maintained by the ISP, and if so, for what duration?

                                          coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • coliverC
                                            coliver @Dashrender
                                            last edited by

                                            @dashrender said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                                            @coliver said in US Department of Justice Seeking IP Addresses of All 1.3m Visitors to DisruptJ20 Website:

                                            How many ISPs are handing out static IP addresses? I know TWC does but the local WISP and local DSL both use DHCP to allocate addresses to their customers.

                                            They may be DHCP, but how often do they really change? Cox uses DHCP for home users as well, but they change very infrequently.

                                            The next question is, is there any type of logging of what IP was given when maintained by the ISP, and if so, for what duration?

                                            That's a good question as well. I know my parents generally get a new IP address every time they reboot their modem, which around here is fairly often due to power issues.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post