Google photos, password protecting
-
@dashrender said in Google photos, password protecting:
@iroal said in Google photos, password protecting:
@aaronstuder said in Google photos, password protecting:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.domobile.applock&hl=en
I think this is the best option and easier.
There are other alternatives but the require Root and Xposed.
Was your account hacked?
I like to have my phone with root and Xposed installed.
It allows you a lot of features not available in standard Android.
-
Any chance he has a Synology NAS? The DS Photo app does exactly this. He can move his pics to specific directories and allow or disallow access to specific people. He could share his vacation photos with his wife and kids and keep the surgery photos private. Each user could have their own login info, and no reason to ever hand his unlocked phone over.
-
@iroal said in Google photos, password protecting:
@aaronstuder said in Google photos, password protecting:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.domobile.applock&hl=en
I think this is the best option and easier.
There are other alternatives but the require Root and Xposed.
I didn't click the link you quoted - assumed you were quoting the one right above you.
The Application lock add-on for phones solves nothing. As the OP says, he needs to have the ability to hand the phone to someone with the photos app open and allow them to browse through the photos.
This is why a separate app, or a way to lock specific photos in the Android Photo App is needed.
-
@bnrstnr said in Google photos, password protecting:
Any chance he has a Synology NAS? The DS Photo app does exactly this. He can move his pics to specific directories and allow or disallow access to specific people. He could share his vacation photos with his wife and kids and keep the surgery photos private. Each user could have their own login info, and no reason to ever hand his unlocked phone over.
nope he does not. And this would be an overboard thing to purchase for this.
-
@dashrender I would say just use a different app for the surgical photos. I cant imagine this is "HIPAA Compliant" anyway.
-
@bigbear said in Google photos, password protecting:
@dashrender I would say just use a different app for the surgical photos. I cant imagine this is "HIPAA Compliant" anyway.
actually, as long as the photo doesn't include a face, it's pretty much in the clear. I suppose tatoos would also be something else to avoid.
-
@dashrender said in Google photos, password protecting:
@bigbear said in Google photos, password protecting:
@dashrender I would say just use a different app for the surgical photos. I cant imagine this is "HIPAA Compliant" anyway.
actually, as long as the photo doesn't include a face, it's pretty much in the clear. I suppose tatoos would also be something else to avoid.
Meta data on the image would be a big deal. EXIF is easily HIPAA covered.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Google photos, password protecting:
@dashrender said in Google photos, password protecting:
@bigbear said in Google photos, password protecting:
@dashrender I would say just use a different app for the surgical photos. I cant imagine this is "HIPAA Compliant" anyway.
actually, as long as the photo doesn't include a face, it's pretty much in the clear. I suppose tatoos would also be something else to avoid.
Meta data on the image would be a big deal. EXIF is easily HIPAA covered.
Why? Unlabeled Leg A was in location 123 on the 21st of Feb, 2017. No PHI to fall under HIPAA
-
@jaredbusch said in Google photos, password protecting:
@scottalanmiller said in Google photos, password protecting:
@dashrender said in Google photos, password protecting:
@bigbear said in Google photos, password protecting:
@dashrender I would say just use a different app for the surgical photos. I cant imagine this is "HIPAA Compliant" anyway.
actually, as long as the photo doesn't include a face, it's pretty much in the clear. I suppose tatoos would also be something else to avoid.
Meta data on the image would be a big deal. EXIF is easily HIPAA covered.
Why? Unlabeled Leg A was in location 123 on the 21st of Feb, 2017. No PHI to fall under HIPAA
Exactly. There is no personally identifiable data in the EXIF.
-
Not sure if this would help, I know you said he wants the ease of use thing, but my solution would be storing those photos in new folder, and creating in that folder the file called .nomedia, and that will skip it from being indexed in the gallery.
So next time if he wants to go to the surgery photos, he will have to use the File Manager and not the gallery.
-
@emad-r said in Google photos, password protecting:
Not sure if this would help, I know you said he wants the ease of use thing, but my solution would be storing those photos in new folder, and creating in that folder the file called .nomedia, and that will skip it from being indexed in the gallery.
So next time if he wants to go to the surgery photos, he will have to use the File Manager and not the gallery.
How do you get the camera to save to the folder? and how easy is it to switch the camera from one folder to another?
