@scottalanmiller

@scottalanmiller said in Bad one: SonicWALL Remote Management Vulnerability:

@iroal said in Bad one: SonicWALL Remote Management Vulnerability:

@scottalanmiller said in Bad one: SonicWALL Remote Management Vulnerability:

UBNT

For what reason? Are there any problem with Pfsense ?

Not problems, pfSense is a good product. The biggest "problem" is the lack of vertical integration with hardware. With the UBNT we get software custom made for the specific hardware, and support. So we don't have to do our own installs, and don't need random third party software. It's one, inclusive package that is well known and tested both in the field and by the vendor. pfSense is software only and as a software firewall would be at the top of my list. But we deploy hardware and the benefits are the lower cost, better supported hardware with massive supply chain are pretty impossible to beat.

And the central monitoring features of UBNT carry a lot of value. We get centralized visibility.

Thanks for your opinion, I always learn of them.

@scottalanmiller said in Bad one: SonicWALL Remote Management Vulnerability:

UBNT

For what reason? Are there any problem with Pfsense ?

4 years ago I changed SonicWall for Pfsense.

One of the best changes I've ever done.

Mi brother works in Huawei (Spain branch )

He told me the spanish employees are nervous but the the Chinese are very calm.

Huawei have the most advanced 5g technology and at least Europe need this technology.

@scottalanmiller

It seems identical to Windows 2016 .

Problem solve.

In Cisco Switch you cannot add an Access port to a Trunk port, instead you need to create a native Vlan and add the Vlan to the Trunk configuration.

This is the correct way:

interface GigabitEthernet2/0/38
switchport trunk allowed vlan 3,99
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 3
switchport mode trunk
end

Regards

Hi.

I'm migrating a 3Com Baseline router for a new Cisco C3750X, everything works but I have problem with 1 Vlan.

In 3Com I have this configuration, an Ubitiqui Wifi with two Vlan (one for Lan (Vlan 3) and one for Guest (Vlan 99) in 3Com port 38

In 3Com port 20 I connect to Pfsense Firewall and Captive portal service to provide Wifi to the guest (Vlan 99)

This is 3com Configuration:

*#

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/38

port link-type trunk

undo port trunk permit vlan 1

port trunk permit vlan 3 99

port trunk pvid vlan 3

stp edged-port enable

interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20

port link-type trunk

undo port trunk permit vlan 1

port trunk permit vlan 99

stp edged-port enable

#*

I try to replicate the same in a Cisco C3750X but I'm unable to make it works.

This is how I have configured the ports:

*interface GigabitEthernet2/0/38

switchport access vlan 3

switchport trunk allowed vlan 99

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

interface GigabitEthernet2/0/20

switchport trunk allowed vlan 99

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk*

Could someone help me with this configuration ?

Thanks a lot.

Check this link:

https://superuser.com/questions/1119883/windows-10-enable-ntfs-long-paths-policy-option-missing