ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    SonicWall devices

    IT Discussion
    6
    21
    2.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User
      last edited by

      Honestly I don't know why more SMBs don't consider Pfsense. They rule it out as "home grade" or something. But it's cheap (free aside from hardware) and P4 or core, or iseries will run it with ease. I've ran them very successfully with many VPNs (10gb throughput) and it has great firewall, vlan and limiting settings. even scheudling on the limiting so you can open it up for nightly updates to run full speed when no one is on the network.

      Sonic wall is something I'd stay away from. Ubiquiti has good stuff. Cisco does as well, but IMO cisco is becoming less and less attractive in the market as others come up with better priced/feature units than cisco offers.

      Reid CooperR JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User
        last edited by

        MRTG on your side + on the ISP side will give you a good picture of what does on,

        gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Reid CooperR
          Reid Cooper
          last edited by

          pfSense is pretty good. Much better than many expensive options.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Reid CooperR
            Reid Cooper @A Former User
            last edited by

            @thecreativeone91 said:

            Sonic wall is something I'd stay away from. Ubiquiti has good stuff. Cisco does as well, but IMO cisco is becoming less and less attractive in the market as others come up with better priced/feature units than cisco offers.

            I have to agree with this. Cisco has really lost their edge.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @A Former User
              last edited by

              @thecreativeone91 said:

              Honestly I don't know why more SMBs don't consider Pfsense. They rule it out as "home grade" or something. But it's cheap (free aside from hardware) and P4 or core, or iseries will run it with ease. I've ran them very successfully with many VPNs (10gb throughput) and it has great firewall, vlan and limiting settings. even scheudling on the limiting so you can open it up for nightly updates to run full speed when no one is on the network.

              Sonic wall is something I'd stay away from. Ubiquiti has good stuff. Cisco does as well, but IMO cisco is becoming less and less attractive in the market as others come up with better priced/feature units than cisco offers.

              The only reason I do not run pfSense is because I want a small simple hardware device, and Ubiquiti fits that for me. Prior to finding the Ubiquiti EdgeRouters, I was using pfSense on old hardware. Prior to that I was using ClearOS.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Reid CooperR
                Reid Cooper
                last edited by

                Very true. pfSense only makes sense if you have existing hardware to reuse.

                gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • gjacobseG
                  gjacobse @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  MRTG on your side + on the ISP side will give you a good picture of what does on,

                  Sorry .. What? What is MRTG -...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • gjacobseG
                    gjacobse @Reid Cooper
                    last edited by

                    @Reid-Cooper said:

                    Very true. pfSense only makes sense if you have existing hardware to reuse.

                    @JaredBusch said:

                    @thecreativeone91 said:

                    Honestly I don't know why more SMBs don't consider Pfsense. They rule it out as "home grade" or something. But it's cheap (free aside from hardware) and P4 or core, or iseries will run it with ease. I've ran them very successfully with many VPNs (10gb throughput) and it has great firewall, vlan and limiting settings. even scheudling on the limiting so you can open it up for nightly updates to run full speed when no one is on the network.

                    Sonic wall is something I'd stay away from. Ubiquiti has good stuff. Cisco does as well, but IMO cisco is becoming less and less attractive in the market as others come up with better priced/feature units than cisco offers.

                    The only reason I do not run pfSense is because I want a small simple hardware device, and Ubiquiti fits that for me. Prior to finding the Ubiquiti EdgeRouters, I was using pfSense on old hardware. Prior to that I was using ClearOS.

                    I have a Ubquiti Lite router for one site,.. just haven't had much luck with decypher it yet.. Of course when you have one crisis after another (Yes, I do know it's the IT world... it's a daily thing) I need some decompression time.

                    I like Untangle for the same basic reasons it would appear that pfSense is out,.. Open Source and free....

                    As for size,.. shame the Raspberry Pi isn't 'big enough' to run as a FW with either..

                    JaredBuschJ Reid CooperR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @gjacobse
                      last edited by

                      @g.jacobse why is open source out? support can be purchased for both solutions you mention.

                      gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • gjacobseG
                        gjacobse @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @JaredBusch said:

                        @g.jacobse why is open source out? support can be purchased for both solutions you mention.

                        Hmm,... 'out' is the incorrect word.. I'd rather go OpenSource as opposed to the Big Box software/hardware...

                        Reid CooperR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Reid CooperR
                          Reid Cooper @gjacobse
                          last edited by

                          @g.jacobse Raspberry Pi is big enough to run as a router.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Reid CooperR
                            Reid Cooper @gjacobse
                            last edited by

                            @g.jacobse Ubiquiti Edge RouterLite is open source too.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              Untangle, pfSense, Ubiquiti...all good, low cost choices.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 1 / 2
                              • First post
                                Last post