Time syncronisation in domain
-
@dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch if this is an Offline LAN, then there would be no "local" time source at all, and no point to discuss the domain. Set the server to a global time source, confirm the BIOS battery is good.
Of course there is a source. It is the local hardware.
Could be the virtual clock, too. Which might explain the drift.
It's possible, but pretty sure this isn't true here, that it would be something like a GPS adapter. Lots of larger companies wanting the offline LAN use a $50 GPS adapter to get really solid time for cheap without a network connection. It's accurate to a few milliseconds and cheap.
In the financial world, we used Cesium clocks. Tens of thousands of dollars and use a sensor to measure radioactive Cesium decay. Accurate to nanoseconds.
So this becomes a question for @meghal ... Do you have any kind of special hardware that provides a way for your DC to get its time without an internet conneciton -- or are you just using the time settings from the OS?
And is the OS seeing a physical clock or a virtual one? And is there a healthy battery on that clock?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch if this is an Offline LAN, then there would be no "local" time source at all, and no point to discuss the domain. Set the server to a global time source, confirm the BIOS battery is good.
Of course there is a source. It is the local hardware.
Could be the virtual clock, too. Which might explain the drift.
It's possible, but pretty sure this isn't true here, that it would be something like a GPS adapter. Lots of larger companies wanting the offline LAN use a $50 GPS adapter to get really solid time for cheap without a network connection. It's accurate to a few milliseconds and cheap.
In the financial world, we used Cesium clocks. Tens of thousands of dollars and use a sensor to measure radioactive Cesium decay. Accurate to nanoseconds.
So this becomes a question for @meghal ... Do you have any kind of special hardware that provides a way for your DC to get its time without an internet conneciton -- or are you just using the time settings from the OS?
And is the OS seeing a physical clock or a virtual one? And is there a healthy battery on that clock?
Does VMWare 5, 6 or 7 use the hardware clock and pass that information along to the VMs?
-
@Dashrender said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch if this is an Offline LAN, then there would be no "local" time source at all, and no point to discuss the domain. Set the server to a global time source, confirm the BIOS battery is good.
Of course there is a source. It is the local hardware.
Could be the virtual clock, too. Which might explain the drift.
It's possible, but pretty sure this isn't true here, that it would be something like a GPS adapter. Lots of larger companies wanting the offline LAN use a $50 GPS adapter to get really solid time for cheap without a network connection. It's accurate to a few milliseconds and cheap.
In the financial world, we used Cesium clocks. Tens of thousands of dollars and use a sensor to measure radioactive Cesium decay. Accurate to nanoseconds.
So this becomes a question for @meghal ... Do you have any kind of special hardware that provides a way for your DC to get its time without an internet conneciton -- or are you just using the time settings from the OS?
And is the OS seeing a physical clock or a virtual one? And is there a healthy battery on that clock?
Does VMWare 5, 6 or 7 use the hardware clock and pass that information along to the VMs?
I was under the impression that all Hypervisors did this now days.
-
@dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@Dashrender said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch if this is an Offline LAN, then there would be no "local" time source at all, and no point to discuss the domain. Set the server to a global time source, confirm the BIOS battery is good.
Of course there is a source. It is the local hardware.
Could be the virtual clock, too. Which might explain the drift.
It's possible, but pretty sure this isn't true here, that it would be something like a GPS adapter. Lots of larger companies wanting the offline LAN use a $50 GPS adapter to get really solid time for cheap without a network connection. It's accurate to a few milliseconds and cheap.
In the financial world, we used Cesium clocks. Tens of thousands of dollars and use a sensor to measure radioactive Cesium decay. Accurate to nanoseconds.
So this becomes a question for @meghal ... Do you have any kind of special hardware that provides a way for your DC to get its time without an internet conneciton -- or are you just using the time settings from the OS?
And is the OS seeing a physical clock or a virtual one? And is there a healthy battery on that clock?
Does VMWare 5, 6 or 7 use the hardware clock and pass that information along to the VMs?
I was under the impression that all Hypervisors did this now days.
Why would you not have been under this impression in the ESX 4 days? But clearly that wasn't the case as Scott mentioned above.
-
@Dashrender said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@Dashrender said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@dafyre said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@JaredBusch if this is an Offline LAN, then there would be no "local" time source at all, and no point to discuss the domain. Set the server to a global time source, confirm the BIOS battery is good.
Of course there is a source. It is the local hardware.
Could be the virtual clock, too. Which might explain the drift.
It's possible, but pretty sure this isn't true here, that it would be something like a GPS adapter. Lots of larger companies wanting the offline LAN use a $50 GPS adapter to get really solid time for cheap without a network connection. It's accurate to a few milliseconds and cheap.
In the financial world, we used Cesium clocks. Tens of thousands of dollars and use a sensor to measure radioactive Cesium decay. Accurate to nanoseconds.
So this becomes a question for @meghal ... Do you have any kind of special hardware that provides a way for your DC to get its time without an internet conneciton -- or are you just using the time settings from the OS?
And is the OS seeing a physical clock or a virtual one? And is there a healthy battery on that clock?
Does VMWare 5, 6 or 7 use the hardware clock and pass that information along to the VMs?
I was under the impression that all Hypervisors did this now days.
Why would you not have been under this impression in the ESX 4 days? But clearly that wasn't the case as Scott mentioned above.
I'm not sure when they resolved a lot of that. I know is GSX / Server 2 days it wasn't there. I know that it is now. Somewhere in between it changed
-
We use a Meinberg in Stratum 1 mode, its good to a few microseconds.
-
Here are my command notes when i setup it up on our windows domain. Obviously replace {local time server} with the ip of your local time server if it exists.
net stop w32time
w32tm /config /syncfromflags:manual /manualpeerlist:"{local time server}, time.nist.gov"
w32tm /config /reliable:yes
net start w32timeI did not have to make any changes to users workstations, they automatically synced with the DC's.
-
I think that we've lost the OP here!
-
You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?
-
@BRRABill said in Time syncronisation in domain:
You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?
At least this one was completely focused on the OP's needs (or explaining what he had said.)
-
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@BRRABill said in Time syncronisation in domain:
You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?
At least this one was completely focused on the OP's needs (or explaining what he had said.)
Trains are pretty awesome!
-
@scottalanmiller said in Time syncronisation in domain:
@BRRABill said in Time syncronisation in domain:
You know that thread we had once where someone was complaining about how a simple question here always digresses into a mutli-page discussion and then an argument?
At least this one was completely focused on the OP's needs (or explaining what he had said.)
Uh....
