ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VMware Axes the Workstation and Fusion Teams

    News
    vmware vmware workstation vmware fusion the register
    11
    36
    7.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • travisdh1T
      travisdh1 @Deleted74295
      last edited by

      @Breffni-Potter said:

      @Kelly said:

      We've already had one agency tell us that we cannot use any Lenovo hardware in support of their systems.

      Falls off chair

      An agency actually said no to Lenovo products?!?

      Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

      JaredBuschJ DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Kelly
        last edited by

        @Kelly said:

        We've already had one agency tell us that we cannot use any Lenovo hardware in support of their systems.

        That is so awesome.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @travisdh1
          last edited by

          @travisdh1 said:

          Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

          This is the surprising part..

          Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @travisdh1
            last edited by

            @travisdh1 said:

            @Breffni-Potter said:

            @Kelly said:

            We've already had one agency tell us that we cannot use any Lenovo hardware in support of their systems.

            Falls off chair

            An agency actually said no to Lenovo products?!?

            Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

            Yeah actually it's quite surprising that someone that high up would be willing to listen and do the right thing.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Deleted74295D
              Deleted74295 Banned @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said:

              @travisdh1 said:

              Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

              This is the surprising part..

              Hence my fall off the chair reaction...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • MattSpellerM
                MattSpeller @Dashrender
                last edited by MattSpeller

                @Dashrender said:

                The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop?

                I used to enjoy workstation as it was a slick way to spin up vm's on my laptop for testing stuff. Switched to virtualbox and haven't looked back.

                Edit: related note, if you think that'd be handy for yourself too, get a 500gb SSD and 16/32GB of RAM. You can have VM's up and down in only seconds. This is on a cheap i5-3210M 2.5ghz, nothing fancy.

                DashrenderD stacksofplatesS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @MattSpeller
                  last edited by

                  @MattSpeller said:

                  @Dashrender said:

                  The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop?

                  I used to enjoy workstation as it was a slick way to spin up vm's on my laptop for testing stuff. Switched to virtualbox and haven't looked back.

                  Edit: related note, if you think that'd be handy for yourself too, get a 500gb SSD and 16/32GB of RAM. You can have VM's up and down in only seconds. This is on a cheap i5-3210M 2.5ghz, nothing fancy.

                  You're not the use case we were talking about though. They are crunching numbers, etc - that sounds like something that should be kept in-house (in datacenter), not randomly running on some laptop that someone takes home.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    Depends how and where they are using the numbers and how much crunching needs to be done.

                    MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MattSpellerM
                      MattSpeller @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller I agree on @Dashrender with this one, production stuff should be on production gear unless it's a really tiny job

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stacksofplatesS
                        stacksofplates @MattSpeller
                        last edited by

                        @MattSpeller said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop?

                        I used to enjoy workstation as it was a slick way to spin up vm's on my laptop for testing stuff. Switched to virtualbox and haven't looked back.

                        Edit: related note, if you think that'd be handy for yourself too, get a 500gb SSD and 16/32GB of RAM. You can have VM's up and down in only seconds. This is on a cheap i5-3210M 2.5ghz, nothing fancy.

                        I used VirtualBox, and then now if I need a VM with a GUI I just use KVM on my laptop. However, if I'm testing server stuff I just use LXC. It's so much faster.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @MattSpeller
                          last edited by

                          @MattSpeller said:

                          @scottalanmiller I agree on @Dashrender with this one, production stuff should be on production gear unless it's a really tiny job

                          Well we pretty much know the size, if it runs in a VM on a Type 2, it's not big. And if we are just talking about some math, what's the purpose of production gear?

                          My dad used to do linear algebra for Eastman Kodak. He could use the mainframe when needed, but mostly they just bought him a high end laptop and let him take it home. Meant he could do his math modeling anywhere, anytime. Was much more flexible. Unless he had a rush job, no reason to tie up the mainframe.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 2 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post