ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Backup solution suggestions wanted

    IT Discussion
    appassure replay
    12
    36
    8.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • drewlanderD
      drewlander
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said:

      e data to another server, retire server
      BM2 - P2V to VM host
      BM3 - P2V to VM host

      Use BM2 hardware, in

      im staying out of this one.... 😛

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said:

        OK so I'm left wondering if a 4 drive unit might be better.

        RAID 10 on four drives would make getting high write performance that much easier. Would just double all of the numbers.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said:

          four 4 TB drives in RAID 10 (maybe I could go 5400 drives instead of 7200, maybe not, price probably it's big enough to matter) should be plenty for 3-5 years.

          5400 RPM SATA drops the performance a lot. Not sure that I would do that here for the tiny cost savings.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • angrydokA
            angrydok Vendor
            last edited by

            My backup software is Appassure

            are you kidding me 😡

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @angrydok
              last edited by

              @angrydok said:

              My backup software is Appassure

              are you kidding me 😡

              I've had it for 8 years, plus 8 years ago (well, and still today) I had 3 physical hosts.

              I'm perfect for the Essentials Veeam offerings once I ditch the the physical hosts. But now I've got @hubtechagain telling me about Altaro which is nearly half the price of Veeam Essentials per host. Testing and decisions to make.

              In either case, I need to make sure Exchange is supported until 2017 when I'll probably kick it to O365.

              Currently my yearly maintenance costs for Appassure run me close to the full cost of Veeam Essentials - I'm sure I'll be leaving them when renewal time comes along.

              gjacobseG B angrydokA 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • gjacobseG
                gjacobse @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said:

                @angrydok said:

                My backup software is Appassure

                are you kidding me 😡

                I've had it for 8 years, plus 8 years ago (well, and still today) I had 3 physical hosts.

                I'm perfect for the Essentials Veeam offerings once I ditch the the physical hosts. But now I've got @hubtechagain telling me about Altaro which is nearly half the price of Veeam Essentials per host. Testing and decisions to make.

                In either case, I need to make sure Exchange is supported until 2017 when I'll probably kick it to O365.

                Currently my yearly maintenance costs for Appassure run me close to the full cost of Veeam Essentials - I'm sure I'll be leaving them when renewal time comes along.

                Why wait till 2017 to move to O365? With DirSync and other tools, you can have SSO and all the joys of on premise, and not have to worry about a physical device.

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @gjacobse
                  last edited by

                  @gjacobse said:

                  Why wait till 2017 to move to O365? With DirSync and other tools, you can have SSO and all the joys of on premise, and not have to worry about a physical device.

                  Because I am already paying a three year SA Open License agreement for my current setup that expires in 2017.

                  Also, before I can even consider moving, I have to either move most if not all users to OWA or fully implement a complete replacement system for our current calendaring system for physician calendars that will sync with iPhone/iPad/Android.

                  Outlook cached mode is completely unusable for us. I quickly discovered when we converted from Domino to Exchange that cached mode wasn't anywhere near real time when updating other people's calendars. We require realtime (or very very close to) updates so that all 80+ people viewing calendars are aware of changes/updates, etc. OWA or a third party would work for this, but O365 with Outlook in non cached mode I would only image would be a horrible experience.

                  coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    Baustin213 @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender I may have a somewhat self-serving answer here. Not sure it's exactly what you're looking for, but have you tried R1Soft?

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • coliverC
                      coliver @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said:

                      @gjacobse said:

                      Why wait till 2017 to move to O365? With DirSync and other tools, you can have SSO and all the joys of on premise, and not have to worry about a physical device.

                      Because I am already paying a three year SA Open License agreement for my current setup that expires in 2017.

                      Also, before I can even consider moving, I have to either move most if not all users to OWA or fully implement a complete replacement system for our current calendaring system for physician calendars that will sync with iPhone/iPad/Android.

                      Outlook cached mode is completely unusable for us. I quickly discovered when we converted from Domino to Exchange that cached mode wasn't anywhere near real time when updating other people's calendars. We require realtime (or very very close to) updates so that all 80+ people viewing calendars are aware of changes/updates, etc. OWA or a third party would work for this, but O365 with Outlook in non cached mode I would only image would be a horrible experience.

                      Have you tried Sharepoint Online shared calendars. I'm fairly certain they can readily sync with an Android/iOS device. Maybe not as a primary calendar but then again your third party app wouldn't be primary either.

                      PSX_DefectorP DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • angrydokA
                        angrydok Vendor @Dashrender
                        last edited by angrydok

                        @Dashrender I am sure you'll test that before the purchase, so I have almost no doubts you will decide to go with us 😉

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • PSX_DefectorP
                          PSX_Defector @coliver
                          last edited by

                          @coliver said:

                          @Dashrender said:

                          @gjacobse said:

                          Why wait till 2017 to move to O365? With DirSync and other tools, you can have SSO and all the joys of on premise, and not have to worry about a physical device.

                          Because I am already paying a three year SA Open License agreement for my current setup that expires in 2017.

                          Also, before I can even consider moving, I have to either move most if not all users to OWA or fully implement a complete replacement system for our current calendaring system for physician calendars that will sync with iPhone/iPad/Android.

                          Outlook cached mode is completely unusable for us. I quickly discovered when we converted from Domino to Exchange that cached mode wasn't anywhere near real time when updating other people's calendars. We require realtime (or very very close to) updates so that all 80+ people viewing calendars are aware of changes/updates, etc. OWA or a third party would work for this, but O365 with Outlook in non cached mode I would only image would be a horrible experience.

                          Have you tried Sharepoint Online shared calendars. I'm fairly certain they can readily sync with an Android/iOS device. Maybe not as a primary calendar but then again your third party app wouldn't be primary either.

                          That would have been my recommendation as well.

                          Exchange is designed around a set of users. Sharepoint is designed to share, hence it's name. And you can integrate them together

                          http://blogs.technet.com/b/ptsblog/archive/2011/05/31/sharepoint-and-exchange-calendar-together.aspx

                          coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @PSX_Defector
                            last edited by

                            @PSX_Defector said:

                            @coliver said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @gjacobse said:

                            Why wait till 2017 to move to O365? With DirSync and other tools, you can have SSO and all the joys of on premise, and not have to worry about a physical device.

                            Because I am already paying a three year SA Open License agreement for my current setup that expires in 2017.

                            Also, before I can even consider moving, I have to either move most if not all users to OWA or fully implement a complete replacement system for our current calendaring system for physician calendars that will sync with iPhone/iPad/Android.

                            Outlook cached mode is completely unusable for us. I quickly discovered when we converted from Domino to Exchange that cached mode wasn't anywhere near real time when updating other people's calendars. We require realtime (or very very close to) updates so that all 80+ people viewing calendars are aware of changes/updates, etc. OWA or a third party would work for this, but O365 with Outlook in non cached mode I would only image would be a horrible experience.

                            Have you tried Sharepoint Online shared calendars. I'm fairly certain they can readily sync with an Android/iOS device. Maybe not as a primary calendar but then again your third party app wouldn't be primary either.

                            That would have been my recommendation as well.

                            Exchange is designed around a set of users. Sharepoint is designed to share, hence it's name. And you can integrate them together

                            http://blogs.technet.com/b/ptsblog/archive/2011/05/31/sharepoint-and-exchange-calendar-together.aspx

                            Yep, they can also be shared as CALDav calendars which you can add to the stock Android Calendar app IIRC.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H
                              hubtechagain
                              last edited by

                              @Baustin213 You guys don't publish pricing. I know i normally avoid a company that offers a pretty static product without pricing. but that's just me

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @hubtechagain
                                last edited by

                                @hubtechagain said:

                                @Baustin213 You guys don't publish pricing. I know i normally avoid a company that offers a pretty static product without pricing. but that's just me

                                I believe that that is because they go through the channel only?

                                JaredBuschJ B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  @hubtechagain said:

                                  @Baustin213 You guys don't publish pricing. I know i normally avoid a company that offers a pretty static product without pricing. but that's just me

                                  I believe that that is because they go through the channel only?

                                  See, I do not care about that. If I am buying through channel or not, they can still list a MSRP.

                                  art_of_shredA DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • art_of_shredA
                                    art_of_shred Banned @JaredBusch
                                    last edited by

                                    @JaredBusch said:

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    @hubtechagain said:

                                    @Baustin213 You guys don't publish pricing. I know i normally avoid a company that offers a pretty static product without pricing. but that's just me

                                    I believe that that is because they go through the channel only?

                                    See, I do not care about that. If I am buying through channel or not, they can still list a MSRP.

                                    Completely agree. If I'm price-shopping, I don't want to waste their time or mine chasing down a price (or getting stalked by sales for a product I am just roughly looking at).

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      Baustin213 @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller It's not channel-only. Fair critique about not listing pricing, though. Something that we'll look into, I'm sure.

                                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @Baustin213
                                        last edited by

                                        @Baustin213 said:

                                        @scottalanmiller It's not channel-only. Fair critique about not listing pricing, though. Something that we'll look into, I'm sure.

                                        As others here have stated in this thread and as I have stated in other threads, I will not even consider your product without some kind of simple to see pricing on your website.

                                        Put a big * by it and note MSRP, call for quote, etc. But put a damned price out there.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DashrenderD
                                          Dashrender @coliver
                                          last edited by

                                          @coliver said:

                                          Have you tried Sharepoint Online shared calendars. I'm fairly certain they can readily sync with an Android/iOS device. Maybe not as a primary calendar but then again your third party app wouldn't be primary either.

                                          You or someone else mentioned this within the past week.

                                          Nope I haven't tried it. I don't have a SP server, either inhouse or online yet. I'm guessing that for my inhouse solution I'd have to publish SharePoint to the internet for this to work with mobile devices?

                                          Yeah a third party app would be just that, a third party app. But that's no big deal, other than just telling them.. hey calendar is now useless... here is your new calendar app.

                                          coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @JaredBusch
                                            last edited by

                                            @JaredBusch here Here! You can always list MSRP. If the resellers want to sell for less, great, but at least I have a starting point.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post