Oh, soft phones...
-
But why should you be allowed to be held captive to a bad vendor?
-
@Dashrender said in Oh, soft phones...:
But why should you be allowed to be held captive to a bad vendor?
Because it's a business decision, not an IT one. If a company had this case they would not want to go out and get all new numbers, and even if they did they would not be local numbers since then LEC is locked down. Then you likely will also have issues with 911..
It's not the vendor that is bad, it's just how it works for rural telecoms they are exempt from number portability.
-
@Dashrender said in Oh, soft phones...:
@Jason said in Oh, soft phones...:
Heck there's still plenty of Telecom companies that only have business because they are exempt from LNP (Local number portability) and can hold customers hostage.
why do those customers feel like they are locked in?
Sadly without a whole sale replacement for the phone that provide unique contact info for each user, we'll never get rid of the POTS system.
While the analog portion may actually die, the general connection ideals won't.This is why I teach people to never buy DIDs. Once you do, you are trapped. Use as few DIDs as you can. DIDs are a legacy thing from another era.
-
@Jason said in Oh, soft phones...:
It's not the vendor that is bad, it's just how it works for rural telecoms they are exempt from number portability.
Well, it requires the law to allow them to be bad and them to agree to be bad. The law doesn't make them a bad vendor, the law just allows a monopoly and leveraging that for extortion and the bad vendor just takes advantage of it.
-
Another example of unethical, small local businesses that aren't legally bound to do the common decencies forced on larger companies.
-
@Jason said in Oh, soft phones...:
@Dashrender said in Oh, soft phones...:
why do those customers feel like they are locked in?
Because changing phone numbers can be very bad for a business.. heck, It could shut some down..
I would setup two phones. Keep the old number but don't advertise it anymore. Let the people who use it still use it call in, but advertise the new number with customers, the website, Google AdWords, and tell vendors about the update. After a couple solid years of doing that and the old number no longer ringing for an extended period of time, make the switch. If you needed a completely separate system for the old phones for a while, so be it. That's how I'd get away from those hostage takers.
-
@BBigford said in Oh, soft phones...:
@Jason said in Oh, soft phones...:
@Dashrender said in Oh, soft phones...:
why do those customers feel like they are locked in?
Because changing phone numbers can be very bad for a business.. heck, It could shut some down..
I would setup two phones. Keep the old number but don't advertise it anymore. Let the people who use it still use it call in, but advertise the new number with customers, the website, Google AdWords, and tell vendors about the update. After a couple solid years of doing that and the old number no longer ringing for an extended period of time, make the switch. If you needed a completely separate system for the old phones for a while, so be it. That's how I'd get away from those hostage takers.
That isn't worth the cost.. It doesn't make business sense to do that. Also why do you need two physical phones? you can setup multiple translation patterns to the same extension.. but like I said before you can't even get local numbers in those areas aside from the telcom that has them.. and you can't get a connection the the LEC for 911 either.
-
In the modern day of 80% or more having cell phones, and those phone having no charge long distance, I don't consider this a big deal. It's only be being beholden to a legacy provider that this is still an issue.
But it doesn't matter what we say, Jason's management is going to do what he/they like/want regardless of what we say.. so I'll just go sod off in the corner.
-
@Jason said in Oh, soft phones...:
@BBigford said in Oh, soft phones...:
@Jason said in Oh, soft phones...:
@Dashrender said in Oh, soft phones...:
why do those customers feel like they are locked in?
Because changing phone numbers can be very bad for a business.. heck, It could shut some down..
I would setup two phones. Keep the old number but don't advertise it anymore. Let the people who use it still use it call in, but advertise the new number with customers, the website, Google AdWords, and tell vendors about the update. After a couple solid years of doing that and the old number no longer ringing for an extended period of time, make the switch. If you needed a completely separate system for the old phones for a while, so be it. That's how I'd get away from those hostage takers.
That isn't worth the cost.. It doesn't make business sense to do that. Also why do you need two physical phones? you can setup multiple translation patterns to the same extension.. but like I said before you can't even get local numbers in those areas aside from the telcom that has them.. and you can't get a connection the the LEC for 911 either.
Just trying to think of a way where someone could transition without just dropping the number on the spot... Since some numbers can't be ported. If they own your number, they hold you hostage. How else would you transition without dropping your number like a bad habit? Also, doesn't HAVE to be 2 physical phones... I was just thinking worst case scenario where you might have 2 different systems/physical phones.. But ideally you could just have both phone numbers tie into the same system and answer on a soft phone then drop the old number once nobody is calling it. It's more expensive obviously, but it keeps you from having to just drop the number without any transition period.
-
Why not get new numbers and start moving customers over ASAP. When calls stop going to the old numbers, you drop them.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Oh, soft phones...:
Why not get new numbers and start moving customers over ASAP. When calls stop going to the old numbers, you drop them.
That's what I was trying to say. Maybe I was just too long winded.
