Cyclical Storage Logic (Personal Data)
-
Cloud makes for an excellent part of a DR strategy but I wouldn't put all my eggs in one basket regardless of the technology involved.
-
iCloud is more of a sync between devices (and restore to new devices) service than a true backup service. It has no Retention policies etc.
-
-
I changed my post title to clearly indicate we are talking about personal data here, and not on a corporate level. Though I would say SOHO fits into that frame as well in some instances.
My misunderstanding is still the "don't put any data on your laptop/desktop"/Chromebook argument.
If I have to back up my cloud storage to my PC anyway,. what's the difference if I just store it to my PC, and then back it up to the cloud?
-
It's possible I am just not 100 clear on uses and situations. Hence my posting.
Perhaps it would be best to break this down like we did with the desktop/server licensing debate.
-
The idea have having zero data on your laptop/desktop is so that it's a complete throwaway device. It breaks, you loose it, it's stolen, etc... you don't worry because all of your data lives elsewhere.
That thinking has nothing to do with how you protect your data.
So instead of having your data on your local machine, you store it in the cloud.. that doesn't mean you shouldn't have backups of it elsewhere. There are cloud backup solutions available. You give them your credentials and they pull copies of your cloud storage data.
Of course you could do that yourself. Have a local NAS at home that you keep a copy of your data on as well as store it in the cloud. The problem comes from the fact that it's not super easy or probably convenient to do that.
-
As I said, perhaps I am just muddling things and use cases.
In one of my first posts here, when discussing backups for a SOHO client, the following was mentioned:
"Move everyone to storage through a product like ownCloud, MS Office 365 OneDrive for Business, Google Drive, DropBox, etc. Eliminate the issue completely."Which led me to believe this was a viable option for both storage AND bacckup.
-
Yeah, it's hard not to get that impression. Many of those services can be used as the backup solution because of the way they work. SharePoint for example has versioning. I think MS also does specific backups of ODfB and SharePoint - though wither or not you need separate backups is a discussion I see frequently.
Products for consumers, Google Drive Free, Apple iCloud, etc generally don't offer versioning or any type of actual recovery options, if you want those, you'll need to pay a premium or another service.
-
@Dashrender said:
Yeah, it's hard not to get that impression. Many of those services can be used as the backup solution because of the way they work. SharePoint for example has versioning. I think MS also does specific backups of ODfB and SharePoint - though wither or not you need separate backups is a discussion I see frequently.
I wonder if that is really enough, though.
Does it really eliminate the issue completely?
Plus as I mentioned the other day, ODfB only versions Office files.
-
@Dashrender said:
Products for consumers, Google Drive Free, Apple iCloud, etc generally don't offer versioning or any type of actual recovery options, if you want those, you'll need to pay a premium or another service.
Which is my question ... what am i missing that we're recommending consumers use these services?
-
This has to be a personal call. If you don't feel comfortable, you need to do something more. I'm not really sure what more to suggest.
-
I just don't know why I can't get my head around this!
-
@BRRABill said:
That makes me nervous. What if my account gets hacked? What if somehow MS, Apple, or Google crash and lose my stuff? Etc., etc., etc..
You are suffering from flight logic. This is an irrational fear and doesn't make sense. Let's think about this if you didn't do this and stored it at home.... what if your account gets hacked, what if you lose your stuff, etc.? Bottom line is, the risk that you will be hacked or lose your stuff is much greater than MS, Apple or Google getting hacked and/or losing your stuff. So the very fear that you have is exactly the kind of fear that should send you to the cloud, not drive you away from it.
It's called a flight or airline fear because it is the same reaction that makes people want to drive instead of flying - an irrational belief or hubris that by "being in control" they can outperform the odds. This, of course, isn't true, but it feels that way. It is a very strong emotional reaction. I've even been told by people (in ML I believe) that they would prefer to die in control than survive with someone else at the helm!! Think about that for a second, that is a strong emotional reaction to have that preference.
Yet we know that if the goal is surviving that taking a plane from NY to LA is orders of magnitude safer than driving the same trip. Same with the cloud, you are getting an irrational panic response to giving up control, but that is all that it is.
-
@BRRABill said:
So if my point is protecting data (as opposed to ease of access), how does this help me?
Because you took your primary storage from "almost certain to fail" to "almost certainly not going to fail." Have you ever known iCloud to lose data? Have you ever known someone to drop their phone?
You can't compare the two. One is like never happened. The other, happens millions of times a day and has happened to lots of people that all of us know and nearly all of us personally.
-
@JaredBusch said:
@BRRABill wrote:
store all my stuff in the cloud.
This is not a backup. This is a storage location.
Exactly, if you STORE all of your stuff in a hosted location, then you still need a backup somewhere. Maybe you get a service that has that built in or maybe you do it yourself, but you don't get to skip the basics just because it is hosted. Hosted can improve each of the pieces (I recommend dropping the word cloud as it has no meaning in this discussion) but isn't a panacea either.
Remember, storage and backup are different concepts.
-
@BRRABill said:
@Dashrender said:
Products for consumers, Google Drive Free, Apple iCloud, etc generally don't offer versioning or any type of actual recovery options, if you want those, you'll need to pay a premium or another service.
Which is my question ... what am i missing that we're recommending consumers use these services?
Do you recommend that consumers have versioning when they do NOT use hosted services? Or are you expecting far more when hosted services are used than when they are not used? I don't know any consumers getting versioning at home.
-
@BRRABill said:
As I said, perhaps I am just muddling things and use cases.
In one of my first posts here, when discussing backups for a SOHO client, the following was mentioned:
"Move everyone to storage through a product like ownCloud, MS Office 365 OneDrive for Business, Google Drive, DropBox, etc. Eliminate the issue completely."Which led me to believe this was a viable option for both storage AND bacckup.
Depends what you are looking for. ODfB and Dropbox are not comparable, those are very different services. ODfB is backed up as part of the O365 enterprise offering. And remember, ODfB is NOT cloud, it's just a normal service like Exchange, SQL Server, Sharepoint, etc. You can buy it hosted OR you can run it yourself, too.
-
@BRRABill said:
If I have to back up my cloud storage to my PC anyway,. what's the difference if I just store it to my PC, and then back it up to the cloud?
- Flexibility. This makes people work like it was a decade ago and cripples them as far as functionality compared to their peers.
- Risk. You are moving to relying on your backups (basically assuming that they will be used) rather than using them as a last resort. You are making one half of your data protection strategy have basically no protection. So your backups go from "nice to have" to "absolutely critical all of the time."
- Ease of Use. Dealing with physical file storage is a thing of the past for consumers, why make their computing environment so unnecessarily complicated?
- Sharing. People are used to easy file sharing today. This takes that away.
- Security. End user devices are insecure both technically and physically. They are the highest risk data leakage points. Put nothing on them and there is nothing to steal beyond the physical box. Store stuff there and they become worth more to thieves and more painful to the user to lose.
- Restoreability. ALL of your discussions around recovering end user desktops exists solely because of the storage of data there. Fix that and you get cascade of fixes in other area.
Reverse your question.... storing on your PC is archaic and problematic. Why would you put your files on the local machine when you don't have to? What's the reason for considering that model today?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Because you took your primary storage from "almost certain to fail" to "almost certainly not going to fail." Have you ever known iCloud to lose data?
I've known it to get files stored to its service exposed.
-
@BRRABill said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Because you took your primary storage from "almost certain to fail" to "almost certainly not going to fail." Have you ever known iCloud to lose data?
I've known it to get files stored to its service exposed.
What do you mean, I don't follow?
