ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    FreePBX - embedded queues, ring groups

    IT Discussion
    freepbx asterisk pbx voip
    5
    27
    8.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said:

      But short of a ring group failing to itself, isn't a queue still a better place for many calls to stack up, instead of a ring group?

      yup. SO with the updated criteria in mind, yes. a Queue is the right thing to do.

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @JaredBusch said:

        @Dashrender said:

        But short of a ring group failing to itself, isn't a queue still a better place for many calls to stack up, instead of a ring group?

        yup. SO with the updated criteria in mind, yes. a Queue is the right thing to do.

        OK - any thoughts how how I inject a four phone all ring group in the middle of my hunt style queue?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • coliverC
          coliver
          last edited by

          Are you still testing? I was thinking if you created a ring group with the extensions you want and place it as one of the static agents I wonder what would happen? I think the ring group would "answer" the channel and thus defeat the purpose of the queue... but it is worth a shot.

          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @coliver
            last edited by

            @coliver said:

            Are you still testing? I was thinking if you created a ring group with the extensions you want and place it as one of the static agents I wonder what would happen? I think the ring group would "answer" the channel and thus defeat the purpose of the queue... but it is worth a shot.

            I'm waiting for more phones to arrive, then yes I plan to test this, but I tend to agree with your logic.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              1210, 1255, P0006, 1280, 1116

              Screen Shot 2015-06-22 at 3.36.31 PM.png

              Screen Shot 2015-06-22 at 3.39.28 PM.png

              Screen Shot 2015-06-22 at 3.39.51 PM.png

              coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • coliverC
                coliver @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch said:

                @Dashrender said:

                1210, 1255, P0006, 1280, 1116

                Screen Shot 2015-06-22 at 3.36.31 PM.png

                Screen Shot 2015-06-22 at 3.39.28 PM.png

                Screen Shot 2015-06-22 at 3.39.51 PM.png

                Can P0006 be a ring group? Or multiple numbers that ring at the same time?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  All of the settings you have I agree with, it's the calling and returning of the secondary group that I don't understand how it would work differently than @coliver mentioned.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    should be yes. You can have external numbers in a queue if you want. As long as the external number does't go to voicemail of its own, the queue will retain the call.

                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • coliverC
                      coliver @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch said:

                      should be yes. You can have external numbers in a queue if you want. As long as the external number does't go to voicemail of its own, the queue will retain the call.

                      That is good to know.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        Just so I understand this, if I setup a Ring Group to all ring, and there are no answer after my set Agent TimeOut, the Queue will pull the call back?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch
                          last edited by JaredBusch

                          Yes, because the Queue never actually sends the call to any destination until the ring is answered and the call established between the queue and the agent. then it brings the call in.

                          coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @JaredBusch
                            last edited by coliver

                            @JaredBusch said:

                            Yes, because the Queue never actually sends the call to any destination until the ring is answered and the call established between the queue and the agent. then it brings the call in.

                            Ok, so the Ring group never actually answers the call, unless someone picks up. That is good to know.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              Edited to have the right name in the title. FPBX is not a standard abbreviation of FreePBX.

                              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                Edited to have the right name in the title. FPBX is not a standard abbreviation of FreePBX.

                                Thanks - I only used it because I've seen it used other places.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  Thanks - I only used it because I've seen it used other places.

                                  Might be used some places I haven't seen. But in case someone is searching, they would search on FreePBX, not FPBX, I assume. Just in case others are looking for information later.

                                  NetworkNerdN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • NetworkNerdN
                                    NetworkNerd @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by NetworkNerd

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    @Dashrender said:

                                    Thanks - I only used it because I've seen it used other places.

                                    Might be used some places I haven't seen. But in case someone is searching, they would search on FreePBX, not FPBX, I assume. Just in case others are looking for information later.

                                    I can just picture someone saying "I can't get FPBX to work with my OBFN using a VM on ESXi running on OBR10 local disk." And it makes me chuckle a little.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 2 / 2
                                    • First post
                                      Last post