Secret Private Groups
-
I used to be like that with some, but due to other notification problems I went back to that.
-
It depends on the forum. The NodeBB Community I only visit once every few weeks so having email to tell me that someone is responding to me is nice. I only get two emails a week or so.
-
There are areas of say FB that I want to, need to be notified so I am aware of changes as they occur. So for these areas I have them enabled.
Let's say I just loved reading the Anything Goes thread.. I would like to subscribe to that via email so I could get the updated posts as soon as they were posted... - this is just an example as I would never subscribe to this thread...
-
@Dashrender said:
There are areas of say FB that I want to, need to be notified so I am aware of changes as they occur. So for these areas I have them enabled.
Let's say I just loved reading the Anything Goes thread.. I would like to subscribe to that via email so I could get the updated posts as soon as they were posted... - this is just an example as I would never subscribe to this thread...
Funny that you, who dislike FB a lot more than me, have FB notifications but I have none
-
Makes sense to me. As long as they are used in this way, it does not seem like a problem. My two cents.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Funny that you, who dislike FB a lot more than me, have FB notifications but I have none
I only hate FB in that they basically broadcast any bit of data about you they can to the globe (or the highest payer - i.e. NSA). Private groups are great, but as I mentioned with being a member of so many forums... without notices I wouldn't be able to keep up.
Through my SW club I have over 500 FB friends, makes for an insane daily feed. Over time I've unsubscribed to those I generally don't know except by the club so their daily lives stuff doesn't clutter my feed, but it's still insane.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Minion-Queen has asked me to test some new email notification options in another forum. Problem is, the more we add, the more likely every update will break stuff. So we are wary of doing more than necessary.
I don't get a huge amount of email,.. but I really dont' need more notifications via emails. It would take some getting used to... but the notifications here are reasonable... thus far anyway.
-
I disagree with a secret private group being set up here except if it's solely for NTG employees.
Why?
a. I've seen over and over the result of these secret areas. It's never pretty and the bile regularly spewed forth I not something that is healthy for the longevity of the community.
b. If there was one for NTG employees then, ironically, I'm ok with that. I trust that NTG can moderate their employees. They seem to do alright keeping things on an even keel in the public forums and would be simply shifting platforms for a better solution.
Ā
Considering I'm not going to be a part of the NTG section, I guess it seems odd that I'd endorse it but hopefully point 'b' clears that up. -
@nadnerB said:
I disagree with a secret private group being set up here except if it's solely for NTG employees.
Why?I doubt that would happen. This is in no relation to NTG. Grove Social is has nothing to do with NTG other than NTG employees are over here as well.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@nadnerB said:
I disagree with a secret private group being set up here except if it's solely for NTG employees.
Why?I doubt that would happen. This is in no relation to NTG. Grove Social is has nothing to do with NTG other than NTG employees are over here as well.
Grove Social is also a client if I recall correctly.
-
I hired NTG (well duh moment there) to do all of my technical support and also to support the platform it's self as this is WAY over my head.
-
I do not think we will allow private groups for spewing anything. The same rules for moderation stand for even the private groups.
-
@Minion-Queen That's what is called eating your own dog food?
Is it Grove Social or Groove Social? -
@coliver said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
@nadnerB said:
I disagree with a secret private group being set up here except if it's solely for NTG employees.
Why?I doubt that would happen. This is in no relation to NTG. Grove Social is has nothing to do with NTG other than NTG employees are over here as well.
Grove Social is also a client if I recall correctly.
Correct, GS is an NTG client.
-
@coliver said:
@Minion-Queen That's what is called eating your own dog food?
Is it Grove Social or Groove Social?Grove, like trees. Not Groove, like Microsoft software they were ashamed of and renamed to hide what it was (OneDrive for Business.)
-
Semantics aside, I disagree with private groups here.
It goes against the ML tag line about being an open community... Unless that disappeared from the front page. I can't tell from my phone. -
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
@Minion-Queen That's what is called eating your own dog food?
Is it Grove Social or Groove Social?Grove, like trees. Not Groove, like Microsoft software they were ashamed of and renamed to hide what it was (OneDrive for Business.)
Talking trees? Like an Ent?
-
@nadnerB said:
It goes against the ML tag line about being an open community... Unless that disappeared from the front page. I can't tell from my phone.
It did. With persona there isn't a blurb box on the homepage anymore.
-
@nadnerB said:
Semantics aside, I disagree with private groups here.
It goes against the ML tag line about being an open community... Unless that disappeared from the front page. I can't tell from my phone.That's a bit of the concern. But the thought is, and maybe this is wrong, that this particular use of the private groups is only using the technology and is not actually a "part of the community." It's semantics, you are correct. But the behaviour is to only use the technology for a non-community use.
The alternative is to run a separate community platform to do the same thing, which would technically make it not ML, but would actually not change anything. It would still be the same people, the same communications and the same privacy. So, in a way, you could say it is only semantics that makes using Skype currently for the separate conversation not a part of the same community.
I guess one of the key questions is, what makes the private groups part of or not a part of the community? Is it that they are running in the same NodeBB instance? Is it that they run on the same database? The same database farm? The same operating system? The same cloud provider? At which point in the technology stack does it remain a problem and at what point is it a "separate" thing?
These are legitimate questions I've been asking because I'm not sure where it really matters and where the perception matters.
-
Look at it another way, if we were using NodeBB's hosted product and made two communities (made them as different customers, from different companies) it would be two communities on the same hosts and databases and code. So I'm sure that would be seen as okay.
