ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Non-IT News Thread

    Water Closet
    91
    11.2k
    5.4m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mlnewsM
      mlnews
      last edited by

      Resident Evil 2 remake review: Beautiful, terrifying, and annoying

      Classic terror (and fetch quests), remade just enough for a new generation.

      Two years ago, Capcom struck surprising gold with its umpteenth Resident Evil video game. 2017's Resident Evil 7 was the spark the aging series needed, particularly after RE5 and RE6 threw out the series' best ideas, and it proved that Capcom still knew how to deliver familiar chills without making things boring.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • RojoLocoR
        RojoLoco @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

        @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

        Cryogenic fuel sounds like it puts the ship into stasis until it gets to its destrination.

        yeah I was wondering how that term applies - I guess I need to read the dictionary.

        Cryogenic just refers to materials at super low temperatures, nothing specific. It's just "low temperature physics".

        So it's basically in a supercritical state until it fires? I'm sure they have to be under pressure to achieve liquidity.

        travisdh1T scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • travisdh1T
          travisdh1 @RojoLoco
          last edited by

          @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

          Cryogenic fuel sounds like it puts the ship into stasis until it gets to its destrination.

          yeah I was wondering how that term applies - I guess I need to read the dictionary.

          Cryogenic just refers to materials at super low temperatures, nothing specific. It's just "low temperature physics".

          So it's basically in a supercritical state until it fires?

          This is probably just standard liquified whatever immediately boiling and turning to a gas soon before the engines are ignited. Cryogenics are fun, even tho it's just very cold things.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @RojoLoco
            last edited by

            @RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:

            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

            @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

            Cryogenic fuel sounds like it puts the ship into stasis until it gets to its destrination.

            yeah I was wondering how that term applies - I guess I need to read the dictionary.

            Cryogenic just refers to materials at super low temperatures, nothing specific. It's just "low temperature physics".

            So it's basically in a supercritical state until it fires? I'm sure they have to be under pressure to achieve liquidity.

            Correct, it's just storing and fueling the engine with liquid oxygen or similar reducing agent to get necessary flow rates.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mlnewsM
              mlnews
              last edited by

              Pay for Trump’s border wall with $20 online porn fee, Ariz. lawmaker says

              Arizona bill would make online porn viewers pay for border wall with Mexico.

              An Arizona state lawmaker has proposed a $20 fee on people who want to view online pornography in order to raise money for building a border wall between Arizona and Mexico.

              Arizona House Bill 2444, proposed last week by State Rep. Gail Griffin (R-Hereford), would require makers and distributors of Internet-connected devices to ship such devices with blocking software "that renders a website that displays obscene material inaccessible by default." Under the bill, any Internet user who wants to deactivate the blocking software would have to pay "a onetime deactivation fee of at least $20 to the Arizona Commerce Authority."

              DustinB3403D travisdh1T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                The Porn Wall!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Arizona, surrounded by a wall of porn....

                  HAHAHA

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • BRRABillB
                    BRRABill
                    last edited by

                    That has to be one of the worst ideas I have ever heard.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • S
                      scotth
                      last edited by

                      This could fly. Imagine the fake names that the politicians would have to create to unlock their access

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        just /sigh!.../Sigh I say!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403 @mlnews
                          last edited by

                          @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          Pay for Trump’s border wall with $20 online porn fee, Ariz. lawmaker says

                          Arizona bill would make online porn viewers pay for border wall with Mexico.

                          An Arizona state lawmaker has proposed a $20 fee on people who want to view online pornography in order to raise money for building a border wall between Arizona and Mexico.

                          Arizona House Bill 2444, proposed last week by State Rep. Gail Griffin (R-Hereford), would require makers and distributors of Internet-connected devices to ship such devices with blocking software "that renders a website that displays obscene material inaccessible by default." Under the bill, any Internet user who wants to deactivate the blocking software would have to pay "a onetime deactivation fee of at least $20 to the Arizona Commerce Authority."

                          So the issue with this lies in the fact that something that is obscene to one person, may be how you "say hello" to another person.

                          Also how does this Republican Politician think this would work?

                          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • mlnewsM
                            mlnews
                            last edited by

                            Apple releases macOS 10.14.3, iOS 12.1.3, watchOS 5.1.3, and tvOS 12.1.2

                            The updates are mostly bug fixes and security improvements.

                            Apple pushed software updates for macOS and iOS today. They are minor releases that simply offer a few bug fixes and security updates, with no new features—and there are no new features in any of the beta releases for these versions of the operating systems, either.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch @DustinB3403
                              last edited by

                              @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              Pay for Trump’s border wall with $20 online porn fee, Ariz. lawmaker says

                              Arizona bill would make online porn viewers pay for border wall with Mexico.

                              An Arizona state lawmaker has proposed a $20 fee on people who want to view online pornography in order to raise money for building a border wall between Arizona and Mexico.

                              Arizona House Bill 2444, proposed last week by State Rep. Gail Griffin (R-Hereford), would require makers and distributors of Internet-connected devices to ship such devices with blocking software "that renders a website that displays obscene material inaccessible by default." Under the bill, any Internet user who wants to deactivate the blocking software would have to pay "a onetime deactivation fee of at least $20 to the Arizona Commerce Authority."

                              So the issue with this lies in the fact that something that is obscene to one person, may be how you "say hello" to another person.

                              Also how does this Republican Politician think this would work?

                              FFS, did you just use politician and think in the same sentence?

                              DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403 @JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                @JaredBusch said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                Pay for Trump’s border wall with $20 online porn fee, Ariz. lawmaker says

                                Arizona bill would make online porn viewers pay for border wall with Mexico.

                                An Arizona state lawmaker has proposed a $20 fee on people who want to view online pornography in order to raise money for building a border wall between Arizona and Mexico.

                                Arizona House Bill 2444, proposed last week by State Rep. Gail Griffin (R-Hereford), would require makers and distributors of Internet-connected devices to ship such devices with blocking software "that renders a website that displays obscene material inaccessible by default." Under the bill, any Internet user who wants to deactivate the blocking software would have to pay "a onetime deactivation fee of at least $20 to the Arizona Commerce Authority."

                                So the issue with this lies in the fact that something that is obscene to one person, may be how you "say hello" to another person.

                                Also how does this Republican Politician think this would work?

                                FFS, did you just use politician and think in the same sentence?

                                😄 this is true. . . Politicians don't think. .

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • wrx7mW
                                  wrx7m
                                  last edited by

                                  This post is deleted!
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • travisdh1T
                                    travisdh1 @mlnews
                                    last edited by

                                    @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                    Pay for Trump’s border wall with $20 online porn fee, Ariz. lawmaker says

                                    Arizona bill would make online porn viewers pay for border wall with Mexico.

                                    An Arizona state lawmaker has proposed a $20 fee on people who want to view online pornography in order to raise money for building a border wall between Arizona and Mexico.

                                    Arizona House Bill 2444, proposed last week by State Rep. Gail Griffin (R-Hereford), would require makers and distributors of Internet-connected devices to ship such devices with blocking software "that renders a website that displays obscene material inaccessible by default." Under the bill, any Internet user who wants to deactivate the blocking software would have to pay "a onetime deactivation fee of at least $20 to the Arizona Commerce Authority."

                                    How would they even? It's not like you can possibly block all the porn.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • LilAngL
                                      LilAng
                                      last edited by

                                      will the wall have advertising on both sides? like a huge Pornhub logo?? LOL

                                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403 @LilAng
                                        last edited by

                                        @LilAng said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        will the wall have advertising on both sides? like a huge Pornhub logo?? LOL

                                        It should. .

                                        dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre @DustinB3403
                                          last edited by

                                          @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                          @LilAng said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                          will the wall have advertising on both sides? like a huge Pornhub logo?? LOL

                                          It should. .

                                          Then somebody will hack it and make it play porn videos on both sides.

                                          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • DustinB3403D
                                            DustinB3403 @dafyre
                                            last edited by

                                            @dafyre said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @LilAng said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            will the wall have advertising on both sides? like a huge Pornhub logo?? LOL

                                            It should. .

                                            Then somebody will hack it and make it play porn videos on both sides.

                                            So it'll stop everyone at the border.

                                            At least for a few additional minutes. Giving BP the chance to catch em in the act.

                                            Wink wink, nudge nudge.

                                            LilAngL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 343
                                            • 344
                                            • 345
                                            • 346
                                            • 347
                                            • 560
                                            • 561
                                            • 345 / 561
                                            • First post
                                              Last post