ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng project

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    63 Posts 21 Posters 12.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mkaliyannan @olivier
      last edited by

      @olivier Awesome !Thank you so much oliver !. I know programming in python in intermediate level. However, I am full time system administrator with som devops background. I can help for testing

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        I bet that there are some quick advancements to make this leapfrog over XenServer, too. Like moving to XFS or BtrFs or even ZFS.

        black3dynamiteB olivierO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • black3dynamiteB
          black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in XCP-ng project:

          I bet that there are some quick advancements to make this leapfrog over XenServer, too. Like moving to XFS or BtrFs or even ZFS.

          Anything to get away from ext3.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • olivierO
            olivier @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller Yes, good idea. This would be doable to add ZFS support for local SR. I can do it in a week if I have a week free πŸ˜›

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @olivier
              last edited by

              @olivier said in XCP-ng project:

              @scottalanmiller Yes, good idea. This would be doable to add ZFS support for local SR. I can do it in a week if I have a week free πŸ˜›

              This alone would crush XenServer.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                I just want to toot my own horn and say that I first suggested this or something like it fourteen months ago to @olivier .... it just took Citrix' decline for another year to invoke some action πŸ™‚

                olivierO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • matteo nunziatiM
                  matteo nunziati @olivier
                  last edited by

                  @olivier may I suggest to adjust the payload from "XenServer build from the sources" in "XenServer built from the sources"?!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierO
                    olivier @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by olivier

                    @scottalanmiller said in XCP-ng project:

                    I just want to toot my own horn and say that I first suggested this or something like it fourteen months ago to @olivier .... it just took Citrix' decline for another year to invoke some action πŸ™‚

                    Yeah, but without enough incentive to do so, XenServer was more appealing. Now they removed some features, they raised the common interested to do so. And therefore people are more eager to try it now.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @olivier
                      last edited by

                      @olivier said in XCP-ng project:

                      @scottalanmiller said in XCP-ng project:

                      I just want to toot my own horn and say that I first suggested this or something like it fourteen months ago to @olivier .... it just took Citrix' decline for another year to invoke some action πŸ™‚

                      Yeah, but without enough incentive to do so, XenServer was more appealing. Now they removed some features, they raised the common interested to do so. And therefore people are more eager to try it now.

                      Or maybe some of us just say this coming πŸ™‚

                      olivierO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierO
                        olivier @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller To be right too early can be a mistake too πŸ˜‰ You just can't invest resources without good reasons.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @olivier
                          last edited by

                          @olivier said in XCP-ng project:

                          @scottalanmiller To be right too early can be a mistake too πŸ˜‰ You just can't invest resources without good reasons.

                          That’s why I consider myself a futurist more than anything else.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403
                            last edited by

                            Very interesting...

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierO
                              olivier
                              last edited by

                              First PoC is here: https://xcp-ng.github.io/news/2018/01/22/xcp-ng-on-tracks.html

                              πŸ™‚

                              scottalanmillerS travisdh1T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 7
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @olivier
                                last edited by

                                @olivier said in XCP-ng project:

                                First PoC is here: https://xcp-ng.github.io/news/2018/01/22/xcp-ng-on-tracks.html

                                πŸ™‚

                                Awesome, congrats!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • travisdh1T
                                  travisdh1 @olivier
                                  last edited by

                                  @olivier said in XCP-ng project:

                                  First PoC is here: https://xcp-ng.github.io/news/2018/01/22/xcp-ng-on-tracks.html

                                  πŸ™‚

                                  Great work!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • momurdaM
                                    momurda
                                    last edited by

                                    Good news, and quickly at that!
                                    Question, is your build using the same versions of perl(5 year old release in XS7) and python(nearly 5 years old) as XS7.2?
                                    Is the plan to use more modern versions of these eventually?

                                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403 @momurda
                                      last edited by

                                      @momurda said in XCP-ng project:

                                      Good news, and quickly at that!
                                      Question, is your build using the same versions of perl(5 year old release in XS7) and python(nearly 5 years old) as XS7.2?
                                      Is the plan to use more modern versions of these eventually?

                                      At the moment, this was directly from 7.2 and just disable the restrictions.

                                      That may come down the pipe based on what I read.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierO
                                        olivier
                                        last edited by

                                        The short term goal is to have:

                                        • the latest XS version with "XenServer" name replaced by XCP-ng
                                        • removal of all feature restriction
                                        • easy upgrade path from XS to XCP-ng

                                        Mid-term goal:

                                        • rely on RPM repo for all operations
                                        • validate/authorize more vanilla packages to be used on Dom0 for more integrations within Xen and XAPI

                                        Long-term goal:

                                        • contribute directly to mainline (XAPI/drivers)
                                        • re-unite XAPI into a mainline without license check
                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • warren.stanleyW
                                          warren.stanley
                                          last edited by

                                          Seriously - this is fantastic stuff !!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • dafyreD
                                            dafyre
                                            last edited by

                                            The one thing that kept me from using XenServer at my current server provider is that I couldn't get XAPI to listen on custom ports.

                                            PLEASE make that something easily done!

                                            NB: I haven't used XenServer since 7.0.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 1 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post