ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    How to Layer Your Security Needs

    IT Discussion
    8
    85
    5.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @jmoore
      last edited by

      @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

      @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

      @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

      AV....

      There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

      Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

      If you need centralized reporting on Windows Defender, you can purchase Intune.

      I have not used it yet but I heard it was pretty cool. Thanks I will look into it more

      InTune isn't cheap or nice. We tried it for a while, but it's not very impressive.

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

        @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

        @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

        AV....

        There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

        Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

        that makes a lot of sense. I read in lots of places when people ask for AV recommendations it is always somethign different and Defender is barely mentioned. Why is that then?

        Because no one makes money pushing Defender.

        Plus people are MS haters.

        scottalanmillerS jmooreJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jmooreJ
          jmoore @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

          @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

          @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

          @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

          Any brands of firewalls or AV to avoid?

          Loads and loads. It's more the other way around, which make sense to consider.

          For firewalls, first you can't lump firewalls and UTM together. Different animals from different vendors.

          I thought UTM's were firewalls with a lot more features. Kind of like, a do everything security box?

          They are, sort of. UTM means "firewall plus loads of applications." It's a silly thing. The firewall is still the firewall, the UTM functionality is apps running on top of the firewall's processor.

          ok I see. I have never liked designs like that. I do prefer the independent designs as things just seem to work better and easier by configuring each functionality separately as you need it.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

            @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

            @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

            @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

            AV....

            There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

            Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

            If you need centralized reporting on Windows Defender, you can purchase Intune.

            I have not used it yet but I heard it was pretty cool. Thanks I will look into it more

            InTune isn't cheap or nice. We tried it for a while, but it's not very impressive.

            No, it's not cheap, about the same cost as most other AV packages... but it does include MDM type functionality though.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

              @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

              @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

              @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

              AV....

              There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

              Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

              that makes a lot of sense. I read in lots of places when people ask for AV recommendations it is always somethign different and Defender is barely mentioned. Why is that then?

              Because no one makes money pushing Defender.

              Plus people are MS haters.

              It's true. There is a weird cultural thing amongst the Windows crowd to demand to use Windows, but to distrust it in crazy ways.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @jmoore
                last edited by

                @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                Any brands of firewalls or AV to avoid?

                Loads and loads. It's more the other way around, which make sense to consider.

                For firewalls, first you can't lump firewalls and UTM together. Different animals from different vendors.

                I thought UTM's were firewalls with a lot more features. Kind of like, a do everything security box?

                They are, sort of. UTM means "firewall plus loads of applications." It's a silly thing. The firewall is still the firewall, the UTM functionality is apps running on top of the firewall's processor.

                ok I see. I have never liked designs like that. I do prefer the independent designs as things just seem to work better and easier by configuring each functionality separately as you need it.

                And your firewall you want to be 100% screaming fast and 100% reliable. Putting UTM functions on there is just asking things to fail.

                jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                  @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                  @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                  @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                  @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                  AV....

                  There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

                  Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

                  If you need centralized reporting on Windows Defender, you can purchase Intune.

                  I have not used it yet but I heard it was pretty cool. Thanks I will look into it more

                  InTune isn't cheap or nice. We tried it for a while, but it's not very impressive.

                  No, it's not cheap, about the same cost as most other AV packages... but it does include MDM type functionality though.

                  Many times Webroot, back when we used it.

                  DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jmooreJ
                    jmoore @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                    @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                    @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                    @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                    AV....

                    There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

                    Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

                    that makes a lot of sense. I read in lots of places when people ask for AV recommendations it is always somethign different and Defender is barely mentioned. Why is that then?

                    Because no one makes money pushing Defender.

                    Plus people are MS haters.

                    You are right on that. I mean I don't like a lot of things either but if your business is built around Microsoft products then it really does make sense to use Defender for most people

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @jmoore
                      last edited by

                      @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                      @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                      @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                      @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                      @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                      AV....

                      There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

                      Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

                      that makes a lot of sense. I read in lots of places when people ask for AV recommendations it is always somethign different and Defender is barely mentioned. Why is that then?

                      Because no one makes money pushing Defender.

                      Plus people are MS haters.

                      You are right on that. I mean I don't like a lot of things either but if your business is built around Microsoft products then it really does make sense to use Defender for most people

                      Yes, embrace or move on. This weird half assed approach is the worst. It's like they tend to start off as fan bois, then suddenly become haters of their own platform choices.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                        @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                        @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                        @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                        @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                        @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                        AV....

                        There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

                        Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

                        If you need centralized reporting on Windows Defender, you can purchase Intune.

                        I have not used it yet but I heard it was pretty cool. Thanks I will look into it more

                        InTune isn't cheap or nice. We tried it for a while, but it's not very impressive.

                        No, it's not cheap, about the same cost as most other AV packages... but it does include MDM type functionality though.

                        Many times Webroot, back when we used it.

                        HUH - the last time I looked at webroot, they were $35/MSRP, and for reals around $20/seat... I thought Intune is around $20/seat?

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                          @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                          @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                          @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                          @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                          @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                          @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                          AV....

                          There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

                          Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

                          If you need centralized reporting on Windows Defender, you can purchase Intune.

                          I have not used it yet but I heard it was pretty cool. Thanks I will look into it more

                          InTune isn't cheap or nice. We tried it for a while, but it's not very impressive.

                          No, it's not cheap, about the same cost as most other AV packages... but it does include MDM type functionality though.

                          Many times Webroot, back when we used it.

                          HUH - the last time I looked at webroot, they were $35/MSRP, and for reals around $20/seat... I thought Intune is around $20/seat?

                          No way. Webroot is nothing like that. Not even close. And Intune is way more.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jmooreJ
                            jmoore @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                            @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                            @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                            @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                            @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                            @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                            Any brands of firewalls or AV to avoid?

                            Loads and loads. It's more the other way around, which make sense to consider.

                            For firewalls, first you can't lump firewalls and UTM together. Different animals from different vendors.

                            I thought UTM's were firewalls with a lot more features. Kind of like, a do everything security box?

                            They are, sort of. UTM means "firewall plus loads of applications." It's a silly thing. The firewall is still the firewall, the UTM functionality is apps running on top of the firewall's processor.

                            ok I see. I have never liked designs like that. I do prefer the independent designs as things just seem to work better and easier by configuring each functionality separately as you need it.

                            And your firewall you want to be 100% screaming fast and 100% reliable. Putting UTM functions on there is just asking things to fail.

                            yeah that whole concept sounds like putting a gui, email client, and a music app on your fedora server. just not needed.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • travisdh1T
                              travisdh1
                              last edited by

                              My preferred config?

                              Firewall -> Local Anti-Virus and ransomeware prevention.
                              IDS/IPS at the network level along with asset monitoring.

                              Depending on the needs of the organization, more can be added on, but I'd consider that the starting point to not be without.

                              jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                InTune pricing is $72 - $144 per user, per year.

                                jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DashrenderD
                                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                  @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                  @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                  @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                  AV....

                                  There are several decent AV vendors, and tons of terrible ones. In most cases, I would just stick with Windows Defender. If you are going to get into the Windows ecosystem and don't trust Windows security, you need to rethink what you are doing.

                                  Understandably getting a central console for AV can be important, so products like Webroot can be great. They are one of the few AV companies that haven't done something to make me really question their integrity or quality.

                                  that makes a lot of sense. I read in lots of places when people ask for AV recommendations it is always somethign different and Defender is barely mentioned. Why is that then?

                                  Because no one makes money pushing Defender.

                                  Plus people are MS haters.

                                  You are right on that. I mean I don't like a lot of things either but if your business is built around Microsoft products then it really does make sense to use Defender for most people

                                  Yes, embrace or move on. This weird half assed approach is the worst. It's like they tend to start off as fan bois, then suddenly become haters of their own platform choices.

                                  I think that people are stuck in the past - Security Essentials was pretty bad.. but MS was just getting it's feet wet. By now it's on par in my opinion. Others think - you get what you pay for - i.e. Defender is free, therefore it must be shit.. so they must pay to get something worthwhile.

                                  and others want/demand the central console, which you can't get without Intune, so you'd be spending either way.

                                  scottalanmillerS jmooreJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @jmoore
                                    last edited by

                                    @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                    @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                    @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                    @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                    Any brands of firewalls or AV to avoid?

                                    Loads and loads. It's more the other way around, which make sense to consider.

                                    For firewalls, first you can't lump firewalls and UTM together. Different animals from different vendors.

                                    I thought UTM's were firewalls with a lot more features. Kind of like, a do everything security box?

                                    They are, sort of. UTM means "firewall plus loads of applications." It's a silly thing. The firewall is still the firewall, the UTM functionality is apps running on top of the firewall's processor.

                                    ok I see. I have never liked designs like that. I do prefer the independent designs as things just seem to work better and easier by configuring each functionality separately as you need it.

                                    And your firewall you want to be 100% screaming fast and 100% reliable. Putting UTM functions on there is just asking things to fail.

                                    yeah that whole concept sounds like putting a gui, email client, and a music app on your fedora server. just not needed.

                                    Exactly what it is.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Webroot is about $36 per seat per year. So starting point is half the cost of Intune's starting point.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        @dashrender said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                        and others want/demand the central console, which you can't get without Intune, so you'd be spending either way.

                                        Except you can. Even SW used to offer that.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jmooreJ
                                          jmoore @travisdh1
                                          last edited by

                                          @travisdh1 said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                          My preferred config?

                                          Firewall -> Local Anti-Virus and ransomeware prevention.
                                          IDS/IPS at the network level along with asset monitoring.

                                          Depending on the needs of the organization, more can be added on, but I'd consider that the starting point to not be without.

                                          I have used Snort before and i think it did those functions. What do you recommend using for IDS/IPS protection on Windows and on Linux?

                                          scottalanmillerS travisdh1T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @jmoore
                                            last edited by

                                            @jmoore said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                            @travisdh1 said in How to Layer Your Security Needs:

                                            My preferred config?

                                            Firewall -> Local Anti-Virus and ransomeware prevention.
                                            IDS/IPS at the network level along with asset monitoring.

                                            Depending on the needs of the organization, more can be added on, but I'd consider that the starting point to not be without.

                                            I have used Snort before and i think it did those functions. What do you recommend using for IDS/IPS protection on Windows and on Linux?

                                            IDS/IPS go on the network, not on an OS.

                                            jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 2 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post