ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Miscellaneous Tech News

    News
    83
    7.4k
    2.6m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @nerdydad said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @kelly said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @coliver said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @dustinb3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @stuartjordan said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

      @coliver SpaceX seems to be in the headlines a lot these days, all these achievements, what's Nasa doing these days lol??

      Learning from SpaceX on how to operate a tight ship. . .

      Or most likely offering to pay SpaceX so NASA can't take the blame when something goes wrong.

      Totally not true. NASA itself is a great organization. Government bloat, sure, though even there not a lot as their budget has consistently shrunk year after year.

      But the science and mission of NASA is great.

      This I agree with. They fund and support a huge portion of our climate science and most of our current understanding comes from NASA missions and satellites, as well as their counterparts in other countries.

      While bloated I'm not convinced they should be doing commercial missions anyway.

      I don't get why NASA is doing climate science. We have NOAA for that. It is essentially a duplication/division of effort.

      If they worked in tandem with each other with defined scope, roles, and responsibilities, then I would see that being the best. NASA be in charge of getting the stuff into space. NOAA will take care of the satellite and reporting back. Heck. Cut NASA out and just contract with Space-X to get it up there. NASA is just the facilitator.

      It's like how IT Buyers just hire other people to do the job they are tasked with. You can cut them out and let the business do that directly and save all that money.

      Except that is not how it is setup.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KellyK
        Kelly @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @kelly said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @coliver said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @dustinb3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @stuartjordan said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        @coliver SpaceX seems to be in the headlines a lot these days, all these achievements, what's Nasa doing these days lol??

        Learning from SpaceX on how to operate a tight ship. . .

        Or most likely offering to pay SpaceX so NASA can't take the blame when something goes wrong.

        Totally not true. NASA itself is a great organization. Government bloat, sure, though even there not a lot as theirbudget has consistently shrunk year after year.

        But the science and mission of NASA is great.

        This I agree with. They fund and support a huge portion of our climate science and most of our current understanding comes from NASA missions and satellites, as well as their counterparts in other countries.

        While bloated I'm not convinced they should be doing commercial missions anyway.

        I don't get why NASA is doing climate science. We have NOAA for that. It is essentially a duplication/division of effort.

        Because they don’t generally do the same research, and what NASA does is passed to the rest of the science community.

        But NASA's mission doesn't include the earth, and NOAA's specifically does. I'm not saying that NASA shouldn't collect data if they are the ones handling the satellites, but they shouldn't be doing the research. That is like the army having airplanes. Oh wait... It still doesn't make sense imo.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • momurdaM
          momurda @dafyre
          last edited by

          @dafyre NASA does science, not launches. That is how it should be, let them discover new things while spacex gets them where they need to go.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • momurdaM
            momurda @dbeato
            last edited by

            @dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            Grafana with Zimbra
            https://grafana.com/dashboards/2846

            Wow that is nice.
            Where is the same for Exchange, MS? Resource Monitor is terrible compared to this dashboard.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @momurda
              last edited by

              @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

              @dafyre NASA does science, not launches. That is how it should be, let them discover new things while spacex gets them where they need to go.

              Why not have SpaceX do the science, too?

              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @momurda
                last edited by

                @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                @dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                Grafana with Zimbra
                https://grafana.com/dashboards/2846

                Wow that is nice.
                Where is the same for Exchange, MS? Resource Monitor is terrible compared to this dashboard.

                People who run Exchange don't care about stuff like this 😉

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • JaredBuschJ
                  JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @dafyre NASA does science, not launches. That is how it should be, let them discover new things while spacex gets them where they need to go.

                  Why not have SpaceX do the science, too?

                  Because totally not the same thing.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    @jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                    @dafyre NASA does science, not launches. That is how it should be, let them discover new things while spacex gets them where they need to go.

                    Why not have SpaceX do the science, too?

                    Because totally not the same thing.

                    Right, I'm asking why they don't make it the same thing.

                    momurdaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • momurdaM
                      momurda @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller They would need to become NASA to do what NASA does, and in doing so lose what makes them Spacex. spacex isnt making anything nearly as complicated as NASA. NASA is way beyond rocket science with clever gyros.

                      coliverC scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • coliverC
                        coliver @momurda
                        last edited by

                        @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        @scottalanmiller They would need to become NASA to do what NASA does, and in doing so lose what makes them Spacex. spacex isnt making anything nearly as complicated as NASA. NASA is way beyond rocket science with clever gyros.

                        To be fair... compared to other countries NASA wasn't that great at rocket science.

                        momurdaM scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • momurdaM
                          momurda @coliver
                          last edited by

                          @coliver True. But now they are doing things like gravity wave detection.
                          The possibilities with that are akin to the discovery and manipulation of radio waves 100 years ago; knowledge that fundamentally transformed humanity.

                          KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • KellyK
                            Kelly @momurda
                            last edited by

                            @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @coliver True. But now they are doing things like gravity wave detection.
                            The possibilities with that are akin to the discovery and manipulation of radio waves 100 years ago; knowledge that fundamentally transformed humanity.

                            This makes sense for NASA to spend their time on. Climate research doesn't.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @momurda
                              last edited by

                              @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @scottalanmiller They would need to become NASA to do what NASA does, and in doing so lose what makes them Spacex. spacex isnt making anything nearly as complicated as NASA. NASA is way beyond rocket science with clever gyros.

                              Well sure, but I want them to do twice as much for half the money. What NASA does is "make good things at great cost", I want them to do something better.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @coliver
                                last edited by

                                @coliver said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @scottalanmiller They would need to become NASA to do what NASA does, and in doing so lose what makes them Spacex. spacex isnt making anything nearly as complicated as NASA. NASA is way beyond rocket science with clever gyros.

                                To be fair... compared to other countries NASA wasn't that great at rocket science.

                                Forty years of NASA just to keep pace with four years of Nazi Germany.

                                coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • coliverC
                                  coliver @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @coliver said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @scottalanmiller They would need to become NASA to do what NASA does, and in doing so lose what makes them Spacex. spacex isnt making anything nearly as complicated as NASA. NASA is way beyond rocket science with clever gyros.

                                  To be fair... compared to other countries NASA wasn't that great at rocket science.

                                  Forty years of NASA just to keep pace with four years of Nazi Germany.

                                  Not quite that extreme but it's a good point.

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • coliverC
                                    coliver @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    @coliver said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    @scottalanmiller They would need to become NASA to do what NASA does, and in doing so lose what makes them Spacex. spacex isnt making anything nearly as complicated as NASA. NASA is way beyond rocket science with clever gyros.

                                    To be fair... compared to other countries NASA wasn't that great at rocket science.

                                    Forty years of NASA just to keep pace with four years of Nazi Germany.

                                    We were at least a decade behind Russia for most of the space race and cold war.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @coliver
                                      last edited by

                                      @coliver said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @coliver said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @momurda said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @scottalanmiller They would need to become NASA to do what NASA does, and in doing so lose what makes them Spacex. spacex isnt making anything nearly as complicated as NASA. NASA is way beyond rocket science with clever gyros.

                                      To be fair... compared to other countries NASA wasn't that great at rocket science.

                                      Forty years of NASA just to keep pace with four years of Nazi Germany.

                                      Not quite that extreme but it's a good point.

                                      Decently true. Until just recently we were still flying our main space craft based on a WW2 Nazi design.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • travisdh1T
                                        travisdh1
                                        last edited by

                                        https://hackaday.com/2018/02/25/css-steals-your-web-data/

                                        CSS being used to steal data. Why am I so unsurprised?

                                        ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ObsolesceO
                                          Obsolesce @travisdh1
                                          last edited by

                                          @travisdh1 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                          https://hackaday.com/2018/02/25/css-steals-your-web-data/

                                          CSS being used to steal data. Why am I so unsurprised?

                                          It still requires at least a partial compromise of the server beforehand. Not really an issue.

                                          ...you’ve partially compromised the server or maybe you wrote a malicious browser extension.

                                          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @Obsolesce
                                            last edited by

                                            @tim_g said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            @travisdh1 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            https://hackaday.com/2018/02/25/css-steals-your-web-data/

                                            CSS being used to steal data. Why am I so unsurprised?

                                            It still requires at least a partial compromise of the server beforehand. Not really an issue.

                                            ...you’ve partially compromised the server or maybe you wrote a malicious browser extension.

                                            Also, totally not practical.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 63
                                            • 64
                                            • 65
                                            • 66
                                            • 67
                                            • 372
                                            • 373
                                            • 65 / 373
                                            • First post
                                              Last post