ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Miscellaneous Tech News

    News
    83
    7.4k
    2.6m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @mlnews
      last edited by

      @mlnews We are deploying it this weekend!

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • hobbit666H
        hobbit666 @mlnews
        last edited by hobbit666

        @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

        Windows 10 Version 1903 Will Be Coming Soon, Microsoft Warns

        Windows 10 version 1903 will be arriving soon for many of those individuals and organizations not presently using it.
        This "feature update" (also known as the "May 2019 Update") is the most current version and was first commercially released by Microsoft on May 21, 2019.

        See articles like this confuse me, i'm already on 1903 May Update and have been for a while. So why say "Coming Soon"
        ...… I've got and so are all my lab Win10 machines 🙂

        DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403 @hobbit666
          last edited by

          @hobbit666 Same, I'm on 1903 as well, and am working to deploy it to everyone who has windows in my office.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @hobbit666
            last edited by

            @hobbit666 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

            Windows 10 Version 1903 Will Be Coming Soon, Microsoft Warns

            Windows 10 version 1903 will be arriving soon for many of those individuals and organizations not presently using it.
            This "feature update" (also known as the "May 2019 Update") is the most current version and was first commercially released by Microsoft on May 21, 2019.

            See articles like this confuse me, i'm already on 1903 May Update and have been for a while. So why say "Coming Soon"
            ...… I've got and so are all my lab Win10 machines 🙂

            Yeah, that was a really weird way to put it, for sure. As I'm on it right now, too.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mlnewsM
              mlnews
              last edited by

              Intel Speed Select Technology Comes To Linux With The 5.3 Kernel

              With the in-development Linux 5.3 kernel is now support for Intel Speed Select Technology (SST) that was introduced as part of Cascade Lake processors.
              Speed Select Technology allows optimizing the system with per-core performance configurations to prioritize certain workloads while lowering the performance envelope for other cores.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • mlnewsM
                mlnews
                last edited by

                What Is AppImage in Linux?

                On a Linux distro, you should always install new software with the aid of your package manager when possible.
                It keeps things clean, and all files are tracked by the manager and can be easily removed later.

                EddieJenningsE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • zachary715Z
                  zachary715 @Obsolesce
                  last edited by

                  @Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                  Slack isn’t worried about Microsoft’s big Teams push

                  Slack’s CEO compares Microsoft’s Teams bundling to Google+
                  Microsoft revealed last week that it now has more than 13 million people using its Microsoft Teams chat software, a milestone that means the app has overtaken Slack.

                  It's hard not to agree. Actual engagement is the only thing that matters.

                  Actually, it's businesses being willing to pay for the service is all that matters.

                  It’s not something you pay extra for since it’s bundled with O365.

                  You are.

                  If you want Slack, it's not because you also want Google Sheets or Zimbra email with XYZ. It's because you want Slack because of what business needs it covers.
                  Slack is $6-$12 per user per month.

                  745bbcc0-e244-444c-8022-3194fa2bc875-image.png

                  If you just want MS Teams (which is a legit need by the way), too bad, you also have to pay for other stuff you may or may not need or use.
                  MS Teams will cost you $5, which is cheaper than Slack, which does NOT include Office or Office Suite, but does include Exchange... whether or not you need it. To get Office, it's a minimum of $12.50 for Business Premium (< 300 users). Otherwise, you're buying enterprise O365 licenses which just goes up.

                  1d77261e-485c-4281-9b48-da517d3d4a5a-image.png

                  c0875da9-a5ba-4b66-a13e-0f077f2c8980-image.png

                  69aa2821-d16b-4e96-8dd4-321c9f87c220-image.png

                  If you're an organization who is already utilizing Office 365 in any fashion, it makes sense to thoroughly vet Teams before its alternatives since it's bundled in. That's the part that will hurt Slack the most is organizations who "force" themselves into using Teams since it's already included in their O365 subscription rather than looking at paying additional for Slack.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • mlnewsM
                    mlnews
                    last edited by

                    Bond WiFi and Ethernet for easier networking mobility

                    Sometimes one network interface isn’t enough. Network bonding allows multiple network connections to act together with a single logical interface.
                    You might do this because you want more bandwidth than a single connection can handle.

                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403 @mlnews
                      last edited by

                      @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                      Bond WiFi and Ethernet for easier networking mobility

                      Sometimes one network interface isn’t enough. Network bonding allows multiple network connections to act together with a single logical interface.
                      You might do this because you want more bandwidth than a single connection can handle.

                      Is this news?

                      travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • travisdh1T
                        travisdh1 @DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        @DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                        Bond WiFi and Ethernet for easier networking mobility

                        Sometimes one network interface isn’t enough. Network bonding allows multiple network connections to act together with a single logical interface.
                        You might do this because you want more bandwidth than a single connection can handle.

                        Is this news?

                        Only to a newbie.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • EddieJenningsE
                          EddieJennings @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                          @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                          D-Link agrees to new security monitoring to settle FTC charges

                          Agreement settles charges D-Link left users open to critical and widespread threats
                          Router and webcam maker D-Link has agreed to implement a new security program to settle charges it failed to safeguard its hardware against well-known and preventable hacks and misrepresented its existing security regimen.

                          Remember that conference where D-Link was there with a booth and all they did was try to tell everyone that they were a serious company? They had nothing to show, just sales guys saying over and over "we do business stuff, too!"

                          I'm a TrendNet man, myself. 😛

                          travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • travisdh1T
                            travisdh1 @EddieJennings
                            last edited by

                            @EddieJennings said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                            D-Link agrees to new security monitoring to settle FTC charges

                            Agreement settles charges D-Link left users open to critical and widespread threats
                            Router and webcam maker D-Link has agreed to implement a new security program to settle charges it failed to safeguard its hardware against well-known and preventable hacks and misrepresented its existing security regimen.

                            Remember that conference where D-Link was there with a booth and all they did was try to tell everyone that they were a serious company? They had nothing to show, just sales guys saying over and over "we do business stuff, too!"

                            I'm a TrendNet man, myself. 😛

                            I wish that was only funny, instead of having just put in a TrendNet wireless extender to use as a network bridge the other week 😞

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • wrx7mW
                              wrx7m @Obsolesce
                              last edited by

                              @Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                              Slack isn’t worried about Microsoft’s big Teams push

                              Slack’s CEO compares Microsoft’s Teams bundling to Google+
                              Microsoft revealed last week that it now has more than 13 million people using its Microsoft Teams chat software, a milestone that means the app has overtaken Slack.

                              It's hard not to agree. Actual engagement is the only thing that matters.

                              Actually, it's businesses being willing to pay for the service is all that matters.

                              It’s not something you pay extra for since it’s bundled with O365.

                              You are.

                              If you want Slack, it's not because you also want Google Sheets or Zimbra email with XYZ. It's because you want Slack because of what business needs it covers.
                              Slack is $6-$12 per user per month.

                              745bbcc0-e244-444c-8022-3194fa2bc875-image.png

                              If you just want MS Teams (which is a legit need by the way), too bad, you also have to pay for other stuff you may or may not need or use.
                              MS Teams will cost you $5, which is cheaper than Slack, which does NOT include Office or Office Suite, but does include Exchange... whether or not you need it. To get Office, it's a minimum of $12.50 for Business Premium (< 300 users). Otherwise, you're buying enterprise O365 licenses which just goes up.

                              1d77261e-485c-4281-9b48-da517d3d4a5a-image.png

                              c0875da9-a5ba-4b66-a13e-0f077f2c8980-image.png

                              69aa2821-d16b-4e96-8dd4-321c9f87c220-image.png

                              We switched from SFB/Teams to slack plus. Waste of money IMO. I didn't like either of them because I don't like chat for work.

                              ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ObsolesceO
                                Obsolesce @wrx7m
                                last edited by

                                @wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                Slack isn’t worried about Microsoft’s big Teams push

                                Slack’s CEO compares Microsoft’s Teams bundling to Google+
                                Microsoft revealed last week that it now has more than 13 million people using its Microsoft Teams chat software, a milestone that means the app has overtaken Slack.

                                It's hard not to agree. Actual engagement is the only thing that matters.

                                Actually, it's businesses being willing to pay for the service is all that matters.

                                It’s not something you pay extra for since it’s bundled with O365.

                                You are.

                                If you want Slack, it's not because you also want Google Sheets or Zimbra email with XYZ. It's because you want Slack because of what business needs it covers.
                                Slack is $6-$12 per user per month.

                                745bbcc0-e244-444c-8022-3194fa2bc875-image.png

                                If you just want MS Teams (which is a legit need by the way), too bad, you also have to pay for other stuff you may or may not need or use.
                                MS Teams will cost you $5, which is cheaper than Slack, which does NOT include Office or Office Suite, but does include Exchange... whether or not you need it. To get Office, it's a minimum of $12.50 for Business Premium (< 300 users). Otherwise, you're buying enterprise O365 licenses which just goes up.

                                1d77261e-485c-4281-9b48-da517d3d4a5a-image.png

                                c0875da9-a5ba-4b66-a13e-0f077f2c8980-image.png

                                69aa2821-d16b-4e96-8dd4-321c9f87c220-image.png

                                We switched from SFB/Teams to slack plus. Waste of money IMO. I didn't like either of them because I don't like chat for work.

                                I like it because chatting via email is dumb. Email is really abused and extremely inefficient for most of what it's typically used for within most organisations.

                                DashrenderD pmonchoP wrx7mW 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • DashrenderD
                                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                  @mlnews We are deploying it this weekend!

                                  I deployed it two weeks ago.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DashrenderD
                                    Dashrender @hobbit666
                                    last edited by

                                    @hobbit666 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                    Windows 10 Version 1903 Will Be Coming Soon, Microsoft Warns

                                    Windows 10 version 1903 will be arriving soon for many of those individuals and organizations not presently using it.
                                    This "feature update" (also known as the "May 2019 Update") is the most current version and was first commercially released by Microsoft on May 21, 2019.

                                    See articles like this confuse me, i'm already on 1903 May Update and have been for a while. So why say "Coming Soon"
                                    ...… I've got and so are all my lab Win10 machines 🙂

                                    They mean they are going to semi-force it on people. Then they will force it upon them later.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender @Obsolesce
                                      last edited by

                                      @Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      @mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                      Slack isn’t worried about Microsoft’s big Teams push

                                      Slack’s CEO compares Microsoft’s Teams bundling to Google+
                                      Microsoft revealed last week that it now has more than 13 million people using its Microsoft Teams chat software, a milestone that means the app has overtaken Slack.

                                      It's hard not to agree. Actual engagement is the only thing that matters.

                                      Actually, it's businesses being willing to pay for the service is all that matters.

                                      It’s not something you pay extra for since it’s bundled with O365.

                                      You are.

                                      If you want Slack, it's not because you also want Google Sheets or Zimbra email with XYZ. It's because you want Slack because of what business needs it covers.
                                      Slack is $6-$12 per user per month.

                                      745bbcc0-e244-444c-8022-3194fa2bc875-image.png

                                      If you just want MS Teams (which is a legit need by the way), too bad, you also have to pay for other stuff you may or may not need or use.
                                      MS Teams will cost you $5, which is cheaper than Slack, which does NOT include Office or Office Suite, but does include Exchange... whether or not you need it. To get Office, it's a minimum of $12.50 for Business Premium (< 300 users). Otherwise, you're buying enterprise O365 licenses which just goes up.

                                      1d77261e-485c-4281-9b48-da517d3d4a5a-image.png

                                      c0875da9-a5ba-4b66-a13e-0f077f2c8980-image.png

                                      69aa2821-d16b-4e96-8dd4-321c9f87c220-image.png

                                      We switched from SFB/Teams to slack plus. Waste of money IMO. I didn't like either of them because I don't like chat for work.

                                      I like it because chatting via email is dumb. Email is really abused and extremely inefficient for most of what it's typically used for within most organisations.

                                      I would agree with that. I need to have group conversations with people often... but getting a meeting together is a HUGE PITA. group chat would be better - of course that suffers from people all being available at the same time. Chat is hugely disruptive to someone working on a project as well.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • wrx7mW
                                        wrx7m
                                        last edited by

                                        OneWeb’s low-Earth satellites hit 400Mbps and 32ms latency in new test
                                        https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/07/onewebs-low-earth-satellites-hit-400mbps-and-32ms-latency-in-new-test/

                                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • JaredBuschJ
                                          JaredBusch @wrx7m
                                          last edited by

                                          @wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                          OneWeb’s low-Earth satellites hit 400Mbps and 32ms latency in new test
                                          https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/07/onewebs-low-earth-satellites-hit-400mbps-and-32ms-latency-in-new-test/

                                          Hi, welcome to earlier today

                                          wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • wrx7mW
                                            wrx7m @JaredBusch
                                            last edited by

                                            @JaredBusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            @wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

                                            OneWeb’s low-Earth satellites hit 400Mbps and 32ms latency in new test
                                            https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/07/onewebs-low-earth-satellites-hit-400mbps-and-32ms-latency-in-new-test/

                                            Hi, welcome to earlier today

                                            Hi. I didn't see that posted in this thread.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 265
                                            • 266
                                            • 267
                                            • 268
                                            • 269
                                            • 372
                                            • 373
                                            • 267 / 373
                                            • First post
                                              Last post