Miscellaneous Tech News
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
consumers don't buy based on innovation
I do. Innovation can and does tend to lead to better products. Unless it's Apple. I don't consider a larger screen, extra button bar, or new color innovative.
All consumers say that they do, but very few actually do. And even if a few do, it has to be the majority - enough to make innovation more profitable than advertising.
Or being able to market new innovative features or tech for an existing or new product...
No new features needed to market as if you have them. Just ask Apple.
Clearly that's not working so well for them now with the XS and XR - sales are terrible for them.
-
@JaredBusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 12 announced.
Has a switch chip built in (oddly on ports eth0 - eth7) and PoE pass-through. Both things are gimmicks IMO.
Is there true isolation in ports 1-7 if you want it? or is this just a 5 port router with a switch hanging off one port?
-
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@JaredBusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 12 announced.
Has a switch chip built in (oddly on ports eth0 - eth7) and PoE pass-through. Both things are gimmicks IMO.
Is there true isolation in ports 1-7 if you want it? or is this just a 5 port router with a switch hanging off one port?
Yes, all EdgeRouter hardware is like that. You have to add the port to the switch chip.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@JaredBusch agreed, and it is cheap, priced well below the EdgeRouter 8.
I get that, but idiots were already buyinghte ER8/ERPro and then complaining that they had to buy a switch.
Yes, they make it because their market research told them it will sell. Not Ubiquiti's fault here. Just something that annoys me.
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
I find the naming convention odd, you can't clearly tell how the 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 compare to each other. You just have to know the models.
It is strictly by number of ethernet ports, so not really confusing that way. but yeah nothing in the name tells us it is the new chipset with super fast performance compared to the original chipset.
-
This post is deleted! -
-
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Requires COPR repository because Microsoft repos can be versions behind. Microsoft can't keep their packages up to date in their own repo?
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Requires COPR repository because Microsoft repos can be versions behind. Microsoft can't keep their packages up to date in their own repo?
Is that a surprise? A lot of their software was written decades ago, and just gets updated once something breaks.
-
-
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
consumers don't buy based on innovation
I do. Innovation can and does tend to lead to better products. Unless it's Apple. I don't consider a larger screen, extra button bar, or new color innovative.
All consumers say that they do, but very few actually do. And even if a few do, it has to be the majority - enough to make innovation more profitable than advertising.
Or being able to market new innovative features or tech for an existing or new product...
No new features needed to market as if you have them. Just ask Apple.
Clearly that's not working so well for them now with the XS and XR - sales are terrible for them.
That might be other factors, like high price. In the past a lack of innovation has worked just fine. So logically, lacking innovation isn't the deciding factor, it's just coincidental.
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Requires COPR repository because Microsoft repos can be versions behind. Microsoft can't keep their packages up to date in their own repo?
Well they can't on Windows, why would Linux be so much better for them?
-
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
https://lifehacker.com/customer-service-chat-services-see-everything-you-type-1830680747
TL;DR... author had a illogical and unfounded assumption and is surprised to find the world is a logical place even though he is not.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
consumers don't buy based on innovation
I do. Innovation can and does tend to lead to better products. Unless it's Apple. I don't consider a larger screen, extra button bar, or new color innovative.
All consumers say that they do, but very few actually do. And even if a few do, it has to be the majority - enough to make innovation more profitable than advertising.
Or being able to market new innovative features or tech for an existing or new product...
No new features needed to market as if you have them. Just ask Apple.
Clearly that's not working so well for them now with the XS and XR - sales are terrible for them.
That might be other factors, like high price. In the past a lack of innovation has worked just fine. So logically, lacking innovation isn't the deciding factor, it's just coincidental.
I suppose lack of innovation itself wasn't enough - but things like performance enhancements were generally there - and that alone could drive a lot of sales... we've about reached peak performance needed on a phone like device for the normal user, so that no longer matters - hell, we might have actually reached that back in the iPhone 7 days and people are only now starting to realize it.
-
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
consumers don't buy based on innovation
I do. Innovation can and does tend to lead to better products. Unless it's Apple. I don't consider a larger screen, extra button bar, or new color innovative.
All consumers say that they do, but very few actually do. And even if a few do, it has to be the majority - enough to make innovation more profitable than advertising.
Or being able to market new innovative features or tech for an existing or new product...
No new features needed to market as if you have them. Just ask Apple.
Clearly that's not working so well for them now with the XS and XR - sales are terrible for them.
That might be other factors, like high price. In the past a lack of innovation has worked just fine. So logically, lacking innovation isn't the deciding factor, it's just coincidental.
I suppose lack of innovation itself wasn't enough - but things like performance enhancements were generally there - and that alone could drive a lot of sales... we've about reached peak performance needed on a phone like device for the normal user, so that no longer matters - hell, we might have actually reached that back in the iPhone 7 days and people are only now starting to realize it.
A lot of people want some powerful phone features, like dramatically better gaming.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
consumers don't buy based on innovation
I do. Innovation can and does tend to lead to better products. Unless it's Apple. I don't consider a larger screen, extra button bar, or new color innovative.
All consumers say that they do, but very few actually do. And even if a few do, it has to be the majority - enough to make innovation more profitable than advertising.
Or being able to market new innovative features or tech for an existing or new product...
No new features needed to market as if you have them. Just ask Apple.
Clearly that's not working so well for them now with the XS and XR - sales are terrible for them.
That might be other factors, like high price. In the past a lack of innovation has worked just fine. So logically, lacking innovation isn't the deciding factor, it's just coincidental.
I suppose lack of innovation itself wasn't enough - but things like performance enhancements were generally there - and that alone could drive a lot of sales... we've about reached peak performance needed on a phone like device for the normal user, so that no longer matters - hell, we might have actually reached that back in the iPhone 7 days and people are only now starting to realize it.
A lot of people want some powerful phone features, like dramatically better gaming.
The current issue I see with that is battery life.
-
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
consumers don't buy based on innovation
I do. Innovation can and does tend to lead to better products. Unless it's Apple. I don't consider a larger screen, extra button bar, or new color innovative.
All consumers say that they do, but very few actually do. And even if a few do, it has to be the majority - enough to make innovation more profitable than advertising.
Or being able to market new innovative features or tech for an existing or new product...
No new features needed to market as if you have them. Just ask Apple.
Clearly that's not working so well for them now with the XS and XR - sales are terrible for them.
That might be other factors, like high price. In the past a lack of innovation has worked just fine. So logically, lacking innovation isn't the deciding factor, it's just coincidental.
I suppose lack of innovation itself wasn't enough - but things like performance enhancements were generally there - and that alone could drive a lot of sales... we've about reached peak performance needed on a phone like device for the normal user, so that no longer matters - hell, we might have actually reached that back in the iPhone 7 days and people are only now starting to realize it.
A lot of people want some powerful phone features, like dramatically better gaming.
The current issue I see with that is battery life.
Elon Musk has a fix for that!
-
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Dashrender said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
consumers don't buy based on innovation
I do. Innovation can and does tend to lead to better products. Unless it's Apple. I don't consider a larger screen, extra button bar, or new color innovative.
All consumers say that they do, but very few actually do. And even if a few do, it has to be the majority - enough to make innovation more profitable than advertising.
Or being able to market new innovative features or tech for an existing or new product...
No new features needed to market as if you have them. Just ask Apple.
Clearly that's not working so well for them now with the XS and XR - sales are terrible for them.
That might be other factors, like high price. In the past a lack of innovation has worked just fine. So logically, lacking innovation isn't the deciding factor, it's just coincidental.
I suppose lack of innovation itself wasn't enough - but things like performance enhancements were generally there - and that alone could drive a lot of sales... we've about reached peak performance needed on a phone like device for the normal user, so that no longer matters - hell, we might have actually reached that back in the iPhone 7 days and people are only now starting to realize it.
A lot of people want some powerful phone features, like dramatically better gaming.
The current issue I see with that is battery life.
Innovation includes ways to use power when needed and not when you don't. ARM procs often have fast and slow cores for exactly this reason. Async threading.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Requires COPR repository because Microsoft repos can be versions behind. Microsoft can't keep their packages up to date in their own repo?
Well they can't on Windows, why would Linux be so much better for them?
At least with Windows, you can just go download the latest .exe or .msi installer.
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Requires COPR repository because Microsoft repos can be versions behind. Microsoft can't keep their packages up to date in their own repo?
Well they can't on Windows, why would Linux be so much better for them?
At least with Windows, you can just go download the latest .exe or .msi installer.
What do you mean "at least"? COPR is way better than that.
That should read "At least on Linux you only need to choose COPR then you get a fully managed, up to date package rather than having to download an EXE or MSI and maintain it yourself manually like on Windows."
