ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    102 Posts 9 Posters 10.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BRRABillB
      BRRABill
      last edited by

      XS smiles, nods at @scottalanmiller and slinks back into the corner.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

        @DustinB3403 type being LVM is important.

        But I ran this guide before earlier today and had the same issues.

        Except that I was installed directly to the OBR10, and still had no storage.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender
          last edited by

          while going through these instructions
          http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX121313

          He added the 14TB drive as LVM instead, where XS was creating a 14TB with EXT3. Not sure why this mattered, If time allowed, Dustin could have tried this command with EXT instead and tried to mount it. But time is of the essence so he only tried LVM.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller

            These instructions, http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX121313, assume you're mounting an entire disk as a SR, how could you change the following command to indicate it's going to mount a partition (sda3 for example) instead?

            Here's the command from the post
            xe sr-create content-type=user device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/<scsi-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> host-uuid=<host-uuid> name-label=”Local Storage 2” shared=false type=lvm

            And do you think it matters if it was EXT vs LVM?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FATeknollogeeF
              FATeknollogee
              last edited by

              @DustinB3403 Just curious, was this hard or software RAID?

              DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                last edited by

                @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                @Dashrender said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                We know from Dustin's posts that XS is creating a sba3 for the remaining space that XS itself doesn't use. That space is created as EXT3. I don't know enough about Linux and partitions, can EXT3 support 14 TB?

                Yes, that's small for a filesystem.

                Not for ext3. Max supported size is 16 GB.

                Well on 32bit systems, yeah. But we're not on those. 32TB on 64bit.

                No that's total. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1532

                Even on 7 which is 64 bit only.

                That's a RHEL limitation. Not ext3.

                https://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7009075

                Even in 2011 it was 32TB. You use 8192 block size instead of 4096.

                Which is what XenServer is built on. So the same limitation applies.

                Tested the 8192 block size on C7 and it indeed block it and reduces it to 4096. How silly.

                stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  The big issue I have here is the raid controller I have doesn't allow me to create two or more virtual disks from the same OBR.

                  Which was the real goal.

                  To have two logical volumes

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @FATeknollogee
                    last edited by

                    @FATeknollogee said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                    @DustinB3403 Just curious, was this hard or software RAID?

                    Hardware RAID Perc H730P

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                      last edited by

                      @FATeknollogee said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                      @DustinB3403 Just curious, was this hard or software RAID?

                      Hardware but PERC does not have an LVM layer so it makes things more complicated than a SmartArray does.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FATeknollogeeF
                        FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        IIRC, I thought one could always create multiple Virtual drives using those PERC cards?

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                          last edited by

                          @FATeknollogee said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                          IIRC, I thought one could always create multiple Virtual drives using those PERC cards?

                          That's what it is lacking. PERC hasn't done that at least in a while. I thought that they did too, until recently, discovered that that LVM functionality is no longer there.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stacksofplatesS
                            stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            @Dashrender said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                            We know from Dustin's posts that XS is creating a sba3 for the remaining space that XS itself doesn't use. That space is created as EXT3. I don't know enough about Linux and partitions, can EXT3 support 14 TB?

                            Yes, that's small for a filesystem.

                            Not for ext3. Max supported size is 16 GB.

                            Well on 32bit systems, yeah. But we're not on those. 32TB on 64bit.

                            No that's total. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1532

                            Even on 7 which is 64 bit only.

                            That's a RHEL limitation. Not ext3.

                            https://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7009075

                            Even in 2011 it was 32TB. You use 8192 block size instead of 4096.

                            Which is what XenServer is built on. So the same limitation applies.

                            Tested the 8192 block size on C7 and it indeed block it and reduces it to 4096. How silly.

                            At the same time though, what person would be using that now?

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                              last edited by

                              @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @stacksofplates said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              @Dashrender said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                              We know from Dustin's posts that XS is creating a sba3 for the remaining space that XS itself doesn't use. That space is created as EXT3. I don't know enough about Linux and partitions, can EXT3 support 14 TB?

                              Yes, that's small for a filesystem.

                              Not for ext3. Max supported size is 16 GB.

                              Well on 32bit systems, yeah. But we're not on those. 32TB on 64bit.

                              No that's total. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1532

                              Even on 7 which is 64 bit only.

                              That's a RHEL limitation. Not ext3.

                              https://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7009075

                              Even in 2011 it was 32TB. You use 8192 block size instead of 4096.

                              Which is what XenServer is built on. So the same limitation applies.

                              Tested the 8192 block size on C7 and it indeed block it and reduces it to 4096. How silly.

                              At the same time though, what person would be using that now?

                              Seriously.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                                @FATeknollogee said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                                @DustinB3403 Just curious, was this hard or software RAID?

                                Hardware but PERC does not have an LVM layer so it makes things more complicated than a SmartArray does.

                                Was this a known limitation?

                                Now I'm trying to recall if I could do LVM type actions in my IBM RAID controllers?

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                                  @FATeknollogee said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                                  @DustinB3403 Just curious, was this hard or software RAID?

                                  Hardware but PERC does not have an LVM layer so it makes things more complicated than a SmartArray does.

                                  Was this a known limitation?

                                  Now I'm trying to recall if I could do LVM type actions in my IBM RAID controllers?

                                  IBM and Perc are the same controllers... LSI MegaRAID.

                                  It's Adaptec that does it, I believe.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DashrenderD
                                    Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    Scott - what filesystem is XenServer using in Dustin's setup? The type is LVM, but that's not a filesystem, is it?

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      @Dashrender said in How do I mount this as a SR in XenServer 6.5:

                                      Scott - what filesystem is XenServer using in Dustin's setup? The type is LVM, but that's not a filesystem, is it?

                                      Correct, that sits below the filesystem. That's just the voluming layer.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        Use lvs once it is all set up to see what it is doing. I'm not sure exactly how it configures on top of LVM.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • 1
                                        • 2
                                        • 3
                                        • 4
                                        • 5
                                        • 6
                                        • 1 / 6
                                        • First post
                                          Last post