BackBlaze B2 competitors
-
B2 was designed to compete with S3. So S3 is the obvious place to look.
-
Eh well Amazon isn't even close..... is no one else in the market space that BB2 is?
-
Did you look at Glacier? Still Amazon I know, and I haven't checked pricing in a long time.
-
Glacier goes to tape, and is still more expensive than BB2
-
@DustinB3403 said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
Glacier goes to tape, and is still more expensive than BB2
Now that's just sad. Good for Amazon I suppose, but geesh.
-
@DustinB3403 said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
Glacier goes to tape, and is still more expensive than BB2
Hence why we use B2. Why are you looking for an alternative?
-
@scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
@DustinB3403 said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
Glacier goes to tape, and is still more expensive than BB2
Hence why we use B2. Why are you looking for an alternative?
Just cost / feature comparison. The boss wants to confirm we're getting the best value.
-
@DustinB3403 said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
@scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
@DustinB3403 said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
Glacier goes to tape, and is still more expensive than BB2
Hence why we use B2. Why are you looking for an alternative?
Just cost / feature comparison. The boss wants to confirm we're getting the best value.
Then just list the big boys... Azure and Rackspace.
-
You can build your own on OpenIO, of course, too.
-
@scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
You can build your own on OpenIO, of course, too.
And host it where?
-
@DustinB3403 said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
@scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
You can build your own on OpenIO, of course, too.
And host it where?
Anywhere you want. In the office, at Colocation America... whatever makes sense for you.
-
I was pricing out Glacier recently. Surprised to learn it really doesn't pan out after about 1TB.
After that, you may as well just buy Dropbox or any other cloud service, you'll get way more features for the same dollar.
Glacier does really well under 1TB because you can store 10s or 100s of megs on the cheap, only paying for what you use.I've always thought BackBlaze was a great offering. The only other offering I can think of is CrashPlan actually, which may have unlimited plan options. It even has software for Linux.
-
@guyinpv said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
I was pricing out Glacier recently. Surprised to learn it really doesn't pan out after about 1TB.
What happens above that price point?
-
It's been a while but if I remember right Google Nearline was cheaper than Glacier.
-
@scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
hat happen
You just pay per GB forever. It's a linear curve strait up.
At 1TB it's about at the $10/m mark which is more or less than almost every service out there for getting the same 1TB.
I wanted to store about 1.8TB. Glacier was $0.011/gb so about $20 we'll say. Dropbox Business is $12.50/m and just says "as much space as needed", whatever that means.
Or BackBlaze Business at $50/year ($4.17/m-ish) with "unlimited" data.
I get that Glacier is long-term archival, but it's not like any other cloud service is bound to drop all your data by accident or something.
SpiderOak would be half the price of Glacier at the 5TB mark.
On the flip side, if you just want to stick, say, 140GB in the cloud, which is much more than any free cloud service, and would cost at least $5 to $10 a month for most cloud services to bump up the package, Glacier would be $1.54.
So I figured, Glacier ok under 1TB, but above 1TB I might look to fuller-featured cloud services that can beat the price curve. Maybe after dozens of terabytes, Glacier becomes the only option again, I don't know.
-
@guyinpv said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
You just pay per GB forever. It's a linear curve strait up.
But it is per GB. So if it is cost effective for 1GB, it's cost effective for a 1PB, right? You are assuming that the 1001th GB isn't as valuable as the first one, but that's not how data works.
It's not a curve, it's a line. No different than how local storage works. Everything that you store locally you pay for forever as well. Just in bigger chunks. But you pay for the power, the backup jobs, the HVAC, the disks, the machines that attach to the disks, etc. for forever as well.
-
@guyinpv said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
At 1TB it's about at the $10/m mark which is more or less than almost every service out there for getting the same 1TB.
I wanted to store about 1.8TB. Glacier was $0.011/gb so about $20 we'll say. Dropbox Business is $12.50/m and just says "as much space as needed", whatever that means.
Or BackBlaze Business at $50/year ($4.17/m-ish) with "unlimited" data.
Don't know about Dropbox' limits. But Backblaze Business is a backup system, not a storage system. BackBlaze' storage system, B2, you also pay per GB for forever.
-
@guyinpv said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
Dropbox Business is $12.50/m and just says "as much space as needed", whatever that means.
That's per user. Amazon Glacier has no user limits.Dropbox is for user files, not system backups or for hosting or whatever. Very different use case. I think you'd find that storing anything big on Dropbox would not really work - totally different mechanism.
If you need that much on Dropbox, you have to talk to them and adjust your limits. I assume this is because they have to check to see if you are still using them for the intended use cases.
-
@scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
@guyinpv said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
At 1TB it's about at the $10/m mark which is more or less than almost every service out there for getting the same 1TB.
I wanted to store about 1.8TB. Glacier was $0.011/gb so about $20 we'll say. Dropbox Business is $12.50/m and just says "as much space as needed", whatever that means.
Or BackBlaze Business at $50/year ($4.17/m-ish) with "unlimited" data.
Don't know about Dropbox' limits. But Backblaze Business is a backup system, not a storage system. BackBlaze' storage system, B2, you also pay per GB for forever.
I would assume that an "archive" is essentially a "backup". Doesn't matter to me.
That is probably where Glacier or other becomes cost effective again.
1GB - 800GB - Glacier
801GB - 5TB~ - Some service that claims "unlimited" or "no limits", uh huh.
5TB+ - Back to linear pay-per-gb since other services limited your unlimited space after all. -
@guyinpv said in BackBlaze B2 competitors:
So I figured, Glacier ok under 1TB, but above 1TB I might look to fuller-featured cloud services that can beat the price curve. Maybe after dozens of terabytes, Glacier becomes the only option again, I don't know.
I see where you are going. I think the biggest issue is that the services are SO different. Glacier is designed to ingest many PB or EB. I mean really, really big systems. Those others are designed for 1TB or less, mostly. And by individual, named users. Glacier is a corporate account. Dropbox is for user sync, Glacier is full scale object storage. Glacier just integrates with your systems and applications via an API.
I have a hard time picturing the system where I could consider one and the other would really be viable. They are so different.
