What Are You Doing Right Now
-
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
though doing 6 hours instead of 1 day.
Why?
It's a public-facing server, when updates are available I want them done as soon as possible. (for my VPS)
But for others, why not?
Then why not set it to check every minute?
Why pick an arbitrarily long time frame like 6 hours?
My point is, if you are going to break away from default values, what is the good reason for the new value. Not just, "I pulled a 6 out of my ass and it felt good" kind of answer.
It's a fair balance between security and resources.
Checking for available updates four times a day versus once a day... Default values don't imply best values or best practice in any way. -
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
though doing 6 hours instead of 1 day.
Why?
It's a public-facing server, when updates are available I want them done as soon as possible. (for my VPS)
But for others, why not?
Then why not set it to check every minute?
Why pick an arbitrarily long time frame like 6 hours?
My point is, if you are going to break away from default values, what is the good reason for the new value. Not just, "I pulled a 6 out of my ass and it felt good" kind of answer.
I thought that six hours was the default? That's what it used to be at least.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
though doing 6 hours instead of 1 day.
Why?
It's a public-facing server, when updates are available I want them done as soon as possible. (for my VPS)
But for others, why not?
Then why not set it to check every minute?
Why pick an arbitrarily long time frame like 6 hours?
My point is, if you are going to break away from default values, what is the good reason for the new value. Not just, "I pulled a 6 out of my ass and it felt good" kind of answer.
I thought that six hours was the default? That's what it used to be at least.
Don't know. It's my first time using dnf-automatic.
-
Oh yeah, default is 300 now not 3600 or whatever.
-
Just stumbled on @MikeSmithsBrain on Reddit, lol! Small world.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
though doing 6 hours instead of 1 day.
Why?
It's a public-facing server, when updates are available I want them done as soon as possible. (for my VPS)
But for others, why not?
Then why not set it to check every minute?
Why pick an arbitrarily long time frame like 6 hours?
My point is, if you are going to break away from default values, what is the good reason for the new value. Not just, "I pulled a 6 out of my ass and it felt good" kind of answer.
I thought that six hours was the default? That's what it used to be at least.
It has never been 6 hours. Both
dnf-automaticand its predecessoryum-crondefault to 1 day, and have for as long as I have used them. -
On the phone with Windstream.
-
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
On the phone with Windstream.
telling them where to go, I hope.
-
Anyone experiencing performance issues with the site today?
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
On the phone with Windstream.
telling them where to go, I hope.
TL;DR = Since you can't disconnect our stuff until 53 days after our submission due to internal Windstream nonsense, you will be refunding us the charges that are accruing. Also, you can pound sand with your early termination fee, as I sent them a copy of the contract where it clearly states at this point of the agreement, we are month-to-month.
-
Random and hilarious bit of trivial found on Wikipedia today: "In British English, it was once common for a colon to be followed by a hyphen or dash to indicate a restful pause, in a typographical construction known as the "dog's bollocks", though this usage is now discouraged."
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Random and hilarious bit of trivial found on Wikipedia today: "In British English, it was once common for a colon to be followed by a hyphen or dash to indicate a restful pause, in a typographical construction known as the "dog's bollocks", though this usage is now discouraged."
a
:-is how prices are marked in stores in Sweden...26:-to mean 26 Swedish Crowns. Just made me think of that... -
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Random and hilarious bit of trivial found on Wikipedia today: "In British English, it was once common for a colon to be followed by a hyphen or dash to indicate a restful pause, in a typographical construction known as the "dog's bollocks", though this usage is now discouraged."
a
:-is how prices are marked in stores in Sweden...26:-to mean 26 Swedish Crowns. Just made me think of that...So 26 dog's bollocks. Is that how they say it?
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@tim_g said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Random and hilarious bit of trivial found on Wikipedia today: "In British English, it was once common for a colon to be followed by a hyphen or dash to indicate a restful pause, in a typographical construction known as the "dog's bollocks", though this usage is now discouraged."
a
:-is how prices are marked in stores in Sweden...26:-to mean 26 Swedish Crowns. Just made me think of that...So 26 dog's bollocks. Is that how they say it?
Next time I go there to visit, I'm going to use that and see what kind of reaction I get.
-
Dealing with a health insurance company who is refusing to pay the hospital because we didn't file a car insurance claim... there was no damage to the car other then my wife spraining her wrist...
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with a health insurance company who is refusing to pay the hospital because we didn't file a car insurance claim... there was no damage to the car other then my wife spraining her wrist...
They might have a point on that one. If you get injured from a car accident, it is the requirement of the insurance of the person that caused the accident to pay for the medical claims stemming from it. That there is no damage to the car doesn't actually play into it. There was damage, and a claim made, but no paperwork filed. If you look at it from the insurance point of view, it sounds valid. Why are they getting the bill for the other insurance company's issue?
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with a health insurance company who is refusing to pay the hospital because we didn't file a car insurance claim... there was no damage to the car other then my wife spraining her wrist...
They might have a point on that one. If you get injured from a car accident, it is the requirement of the insurance of the person that caused the accident to pay for the medical claims stemming from it. That there is no damage to the car doesn't actually play into it. There was damage, and a claim made, but no paperwork filed. If you look at it from the insurance point of view, it sounds valid. Why are they getting the bill for the other insurance company's issue?
Hmm, I see your point so the liability would be on the car insurance. Just not something that clicks in my head.
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with a health insurance company who is refusing to pay the hospital because we didn't file a car insurance claim... there was no damage to the car other then my wife spraining her wrist...
They might have a point on that one. If you get injured from a car accident, it is the requirement of the insurance of the person that caused the accident to pay for the medical claims stemming from it. That there is no damage to the car doesn't actually play into it. There was damage, and a claim made, but no paperwork filed. If you look at it from the insurance point of view, it sounds valid. Why are they getting the bill for the other insurance company's issue?
Hmm, I see your point so the liability would be on the car insurance. Just not something that clicks in my head.
Right, because it was, presumably, the fault of the other driver.
-
The self-driving car revolution can't come soon enough.
-
@coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
The self-driving car revolution can't come soon enough.
tell me about it.
