What Are You Doing Right Now
-
-
@MattSpeller said:
I technically had cans, which were run off a canning line.
The true crowler is generally used to
a) keep the beer fresher longer
b) allow rare beers that typically wouldn't work with growler fills to be taken home -
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
I technically had cans, which were run off a canning line.
The true crowler is generally used to
a) keep the beer fresher longer
b) allow rare beers that typically wouldn't work with growler fills to be taken homeThat's pretty sweet though! I love growlers but I also love hiking. These things are not compatible.
Local brewery came out with "soft" growlers which are plastic but once you shake them they explode.
Cans would be far superior.
-
On the way to the circus.
-
@johnhooks said:
On the way to the circus.
-
I was about to try that GIF when you posted that, it was just good timing.
-
Ha it's for my daughter. Free box seats through the company.
-
Noapta buna from Transylvania.
-
@MattSpeller said:
Really excited to be on vacation a week today.
Desination: Interior of British Columbia (Montana-esque landscape of Canada)
Goals:
- Monster triploid rainbow trout (10lb+) on fly fishing gear.
- Reading with bacon
- Relaxing with bacon
- Beard growing with bacon
- Scotch drinking with bacon
- Campfires with bacon
- BACON!
FTFY.
-
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
TIL what TIL means.
Man ML uses a lot of acronyms.
Today I learned... that TIL is yet another acronym.
-
@dafyre said:
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
TIL what TIL means.
Man ML uses a lot of acronyms.
Today I learned... that TIL is yet another acronym.
That does it mean?
-
@johnhooks said:
On the way to the circus.
You're coming to my workplace? I better tidy up
-
Good morning, Mangos!
-
G'day
-
Looking into possibly doing an overnight stay in Ukraine since we are so close.
-
Waiting for hair cut
-
-
One in the afternoon and the house owner came by to drink with us. The brandy is our house is from our own garden and is his personal estate brand.
-
-
@johnhooks said:
Ha
http://gizmodo.com/is-this-how-a-hacker-got-the-panama-papers-1769836788
Lawyers.... enough said. Never seen any lawyer that didn't think that security was a complete joke and that IT people were stupid and pointless. This should be a wake up call, but it won't be. It's widespread knowledge that law firms are very often incredibly insecure. Talk to MSPs, many won't even touch law firms because they are so callous about their treatment of IT and security.
The reality is is that any law firm that pays attention already knows that we would guess that their security is lax. This "big" Panamanian law firm fell way, way below the "home line", not patching, running all of their systems on the same box, running web sites themselves, etc. This is a litany of professional negligence. But, if you are hiring people to be crooks, what are the chances that they really care about protecting your data? You get what you pay for
Think about it, this is a company that makes its money help people rip off governments and their people - these are very, very unethical people. Billionare's had to trust them with their data because no one could audit them with that kind of data. They paid big money and had to trust... and the lawyers just stole from the billionaire's and didn't do the security that they were entrusted to do. Of course that's what they did, why would they bother paying even for one entry level IT guy when they could pocket that money and leave others at risk?
