@scottalanmiller said in Arg! XenApp!:

@dbeato said in Arg! XenApp!:

@scottalanmiller said in Arg! XenApp!:

@dbeato said in Arg! XenApp!:

@scottalanmiller said in Arg! XenApp!:

@dbeato said in Arg! XenApp!:

@travisdh1 said in Arg! XenApp!:

@dbeato said in Arg! XenApp!:

See below:
https://www.parallels.com/blogs/ras/what-is-ica-citrix/

So, basically, it's expensive RDP with the same latency issues. Why companies, why? Guess it's another "I'll tell you it's a bad idea and then you'll pay me for all the extra time it's going to take" situations. That assumes they can find anyone who will touch it.

Yes, you can do the same with VDI and remote apps.

Well, ICA is one way to do VDI and remote apps, lol.

I meant native VDI

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-desktop-services/rds-supported-config

What does Native VDI mean? VDI only refers to something being virtualized. RDS is as much native VDI as any other remoting technology. VDI is just one to one usage, instead of many to one. VDI predates any modern VDI associated technologies.

Okay, in my case not involving additional software or application to set it up that is not Microsoft.

RDS is all Microsoft. But MS and VDI have no tie together. You can do VDI with nothing but KVM and Linux guests.
I get it... trying to place a standard into a box, ny bad.