ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    The Egg a Tizen Powered Personal Web Server

    News
    linux egg tizen
    5
    15
    2.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dafyreD
      dafyre @DustinB3403
      last edited by

      @DustinB3403 Unless you are running a big website and mysql all in the same box, there's really not THAT much of a need for more Ram / CPU, is there?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • mlnewsM
        mlnews
        last edited by

        That's a quad core CPU. You could handle, in theory, twice as many users as MangoLassi can. That would like be tens of millions of monthly hits without breaking a sweat.

        dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • dafyreD
          dafyre @mlnews
          last edited by

          @mlnews Even with 1G of ram?

          mlnewsM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mlnewsM
            mlnews @dafyre
            last edited by

            @dafyre said:

            @mlnews Even with 1G of ram?

            Sure, why would you need that much?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • MattSpellerM
              MattSpeller
              last edited by

              That's a really cool idea, but they should have made it cheaper. The atom is way overkill, I'm 100% positive you could get the job done with a cheap broadcom SOC or similar for way less money.

              mlnewsM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • mlnewsM
                mlnews
                last edited by

                If you had a large database to load into it, yeah, more might be good. But serving web pages you could easily do a few hundred million a month with 400MB of RAM if they were static pages or from a small database.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • mlnewsM
                  mlnews @MattSpeller
                  last edited by

                  @MattSpeller said:

                  That's a really cool idea, but they should have made it cheaper. The atom is way overkill, I'm 100% positive you could get the job done with a cheap broadcom SOC or similar for way less money.

                  A little ARM would have been nice.

                  MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • MattSpellerM
                    MattSpeller @mlnews
                    last edited by

                    @mlnews still overkill but absolutely a cheaper better idea. I'm wondering if someone got some Intel dev cash.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MattSpellerM
                      MattSpeller
                      last edited by

                      Some of y'all seem to forget the early 'naughties, running webservers on actual junk.

                      dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre @MattSpeller
                        last edited by

                        @MattSpeller Nah. My Pops and I run a Web Server, and IRC server and NAT setup for our network on NT 4 (all in the same box)... Thing sounded like a freight train, looked like frankenstein, and ran like a freight train.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Reid CooperR
                          Reid Cooper
                          last edited by

                          This is actually surprisingly powerful for what they are doing with it. Quad cores for a little thing like that? I wonder if it ever gets utilized in any serious way.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post