ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income

    IT Careers
    gbi
    11
    166
    8.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
      last edited by

      @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

      @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

      awww - our premises are off. Scott came up with that title, not me.
      His idea is that 95% of the population doesn't work - because there are no jobs for them, because (likely) it's all handled by computers/automation.
      So 95% of the planet will be on the government dime as it were.

      Right, so assuming scott is accurate in that 95% of the world isn't capable of working because there literally is no job. Then absolutely give those people a quality place to live in, food to eat and a means to live happily.

      Out of the other 5% as it were, maybe 3% already have a standard of living they can presumably afford. Maintain that 3% where they are and then 2% who are unable to actually afford the life they live today can go down to the 95% level.

      According to Scott (Adams not Alan Miller) 98% are not adding value to the system. The can work, they just don't work productively either at the individual or holistic level. They can stop working at the system either stays at equilibrium or improves - for everyone.

      They are already "not earning" their resources. They get them as a hand out already, but through a really inefficient system that wastes power, money, etc.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

        @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

        @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

        awww - our premises are off. Scott came up with that title, not me.
        His idea is that 95% of the population doesn't work - because there are no jobs for them, because (likely) it's all handled by computers/automation.
        So 95% of the planet will be on the government dime as it were.

        Right, so assuming scott is accurate in that 95% of the world isn't capable of working because there literally is no job. Then absolutely give those people a quality place to live in, food to eat and a means to live happily.

        Out of the other 5% as it were, maybe 3% already have a standard of living they can presumably afford. Maintain that 3% where they are and then 2% who are unable to actually afford the life they live today can go down to the 95% level.

        So you consider yourself one of the 5%?

        Of people who are living a sustainable lifestyle that isn't over abundant and drowning in debt. Yes.

        Fair - but not what I was asking - do you consider your income to be above what that of the 95%'ers should/would be?

        No I'd say on on the lower end of high end for the position I fill today.

        And assuming you are jobless like those 95% (come on - IT folks will be out on their ear like most others), do you feel you deserve more than the 95%'ers?

        I never said I deserve more. I said I'm already making sacrifices to live the life I have today.

        I could go and buy or lease a new car every few years, but I chose not to so I can instead save that money. I could pay $200 a month for cable/internet/phone but I choose not too.

        I could choose to eat out at restaurants every day, but I choose not to.

        I make those choices not because I can't afford those things, but because I don't want those things. A lot of the poverty of the world exists because 1) people can't get work or the work they have way under pays and 2) that no one wants to make personal sacrifices.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

          @IRJ said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

          I've thought about this alot... I think the only way that guaranteed basic income will work is with free energy. Many would argue we already have free energy available, but it is being supressed. I am not sure either way on that, but what I feel is that free energy is the only way to deal with robots taking over jobs. We must be able to get energy costs down to next to nothing since we are able to automate machines.

          I agree, that's likely a major first step - the next one is giving up material things/power. As long as one person feels the need to lord something over someone else, (and that includes power, not the energy kind of power), we won't move...

          Right, much of what people buy is useless. We all live better if we stop buying those things. Making things no one needs or wants takes power.

          Those things start getting eliminated naturally with GBI. Because money goes farther if you aren't buying useless crap. And the cost of useless stuff goes way up, while the cost of useful stuff goes way down.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
            last edited by

            @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

            @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

            @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

            @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

            awww - our premises are off. Scott came up with that title, not me.
            His idea is that 95% of the population doesn't work - because there are no jobs for them, because (likely) it's all handled by computers/automation.
            So 95% of the planet will be on the government dime as it were.

            Right, so assuming scott is accurate in that 95% of the world isn't capable of working because there literally is no job. Then absolutely give those people a quality place to live in, food to eat and a means to live happily.

            Out of the other 5% as it were, maybe 3% already have a standard of living they can presumably afford. Maintain that 3% where they are and then 2% who are unable to actually afford the life they live today can go down to the 95% level.

            So you consider yourself one of the 5%?

            Of people who are living a sustainable lifestyle that isn't over abundant and drowning in debt. Yes.

            The 5% being those that have so much to benefit society that they would keep working even though the ability to live for free is guaranteed.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @IRJ
              last edited by

              @IRJ said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

              @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

              @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

              @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

              @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

              awww - our premises are off. Scott came up with that title, not me.
              His idea is that 95% of the population doesn't work - because there are no jobs for them, because (likely) it's all handled by computers/automation.
              So 95% of the planet will be on the government dime as it were.

              Right, so assuming scott is accurate in that 95% of the world isn't capable of working because there literally is no job. Then absolutely give those people a quality place to live in, food to eat and a means to live happily.

              Out of the other 5% as it were, maybe 3% already have a standard of living they can presumably afford. Maintain that 3% where they are and then 2% who are unable to actually afford the life they live today can go down to the 95% level.

              So you consider yourself one of the 5%?

              Of people who are living a sustainable lifestyle that isn't over abundant and drowning in debt. Yes.

              AI and Microsoft.... What could go wrong? :smiling_face_with_open_mouth_closed_eyes: :smiling_face_with_open_mouth_cold_sweat: :face_with_tears_of_joy: 🤣

              One could argue that all of Microsoft products are the product of bloat and creating jobs that are unneeded. With GBI, it seems logical that open source would rocket forward.

              If 95% of people use slow, bloated software because "people aren't willing to learn" or "we refuse to not use bad software that doesn't work well" those are likely the 95% getting cut 😉

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @IRJ
                last edited by

                @IRJ said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                I'd happily live on a BGI so long as it maintained my standard of living at the time the system was created.

                It's a basic income. Should maintain you comfortably, but should not maintain you above a minimum level. Maybe in 200 years when we are at Star Trek level, but that's a long way off. For now, it's acceptable housing, food, public transportation, television, etc. It's the basics, it's the minimum.

                It is possible with free energy. Literally things that cost $10 would cost pennies. When you consider the fuel costs, costs of gather resources, any machining, etc.

                Energy is never free. Nor does it matter. Because what makes GBI work is that it uses less energy than the alternatives.

                IRJI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                  @scottalanmiller so would nutrient paste be good enough for you? It's also insanely cheap to produce.

                  It'll keep you healthy, but no one likes eating nutrient paste.

                  I basically eat that already. It's called a bean burrito.

                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                    @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                    @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                    perhaps it would be possible to bring all the poor people up to the level you are accustomed to.

                    That's not at all realistic, since GBI isn't about bringing people up to others standards of living. But getting people out of the workforce who are redundant.

                    Doesn't matter, equal is equal. You have no way to "earn" more if you are doing nothing. What you did in the past is irrelevant.

                    For the first generation it absolutely is relevant. Those first 2 billion of "middle class and upper class" will require a SOL that matches what they have today. Otherwise the system would never get off the ground.

                    You think they'd opt to starve instead? Since their jobs wouldn't exist and their standard of living would be "starvation."

                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                      @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                      @scottalanmiller so would nutrient paste be good enough for you? It's also insanely cheap to produce.

                      It'll keep you healthy, but no one likes eating nutrient paste.

                      I basically eat that already. It's called a bean burrito.

                      This kind of NP, not a fancy kind with a wrap.

                      Youtube Video

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                        @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                        @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                        awww - our premises are off. Scott came up with that title, not me.
                        His idea is that 95% of the population doesn't work - because there are no jobs for them, because (likely) it's all handled by computers/automation.
                        So 95% of the planet will be on the government dime as it were.

                        Right, so assuming scott is accurate in that 95% of the world isn't capable of working because there literally is no job. Then absolutely give those people a quality place to live in, food to eat and a means to live happily.

                        Out of the other 5% as it were, maybe 3% already have a standard of living they can presumably afford. Maintain that 3% where they are and then 2% who are unable to actually afford the life they live today can go down to the 95% level.

                        So you consider yourself one of the 5%?

                        Of people who are living a sustainable lifestyle that isn't over abundant and drowning in debt. Yes.

                        Fair - but not what I was asking - do you consider your income to be above what that of the 95%'ers should/would be?

                        And assuming you are jobless like those 95% (come on - IT folks will be out on their ear like most others), do you feel you deserve more than the 95%'ers?

                        Right, IT is mostly a bloat job, here to prop up workers who are unneeded. Think about it, most of us spend most of our time fixing things that should never be broken in the first place. Remove the users, and most IT goes away instantly.

                        ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                          @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                          perhaps it would be possible to bring all the poor people up to the level you are accustomed to.

                          That's not at all realistic, since GBI isn't about bringing people up to others standards of living. But getting people out of the workforce who are redundant.

                          Doesn't matter, equal is equal. You have no way to "earn" more if you are doing nothing. What you did in the past is irrelevant.

                          For the first generation it absolutely is relevant. Those first 2 billion of "middle class and upper class" will require a SOL that matches what they have today. Otherwise the system would never get off the ground.

                          You think they'd opt to starve instead? Since their jobs wouldn't exist and their standard of living would be "starvation."

                          They wouldn't starve though. They'd just keep working and killing of the GBI idea by showing what "working smart and hard" can produce. Making others envious of them and refusing their NP food and board.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • IRJI
                            IRJ @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                            @IRJ said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                            I'd happily live on a BGI so long as it maintained my standard of living at the time the system was created.

                            It's a basic income. Should maintain you comfortably, but should not maintain you above a minimum level. Maybe in 200 years when we are at Star Trek level, but that's a long way off. For now, it's acceptable housing, food, public transportation, television, etc. It's the basics, it's the minimum.

                            It is possible with free energy. Literally things that cost $10 would cost pennies. When you consider the fuel costs, costs of gather resources, any machining, etc.

                            Energy is never free. Nor does it matter. Because what makes GBI work is that it uses less energy than the alternatives.

                            In theory energy could 100% be free. There are already workable theories out there for it. There are propulsion systems that should work in theory, but they are missing a single element or enough power generation at the current time. So if one of those pieces were to be solved, we could have free energy.

                            DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DustinB3403D
                              DustinB3403 @IRJ
                              last edited by

                              @IRJ said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                              In theory energy could 100% be free.

                              Not really, because you need some means of capturing the energy in the first place. You need some tech, wind mill, solar panel, reactor, dam.

                              A hamster ball doesn't move under its own power. The hamster needs to move.

                              Getting the hamster to move is the part that you're skipping.

                              IRJI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ObsolesceO
                                Obsolesce
                                last edited by

                                What are the exact terms of GBI as it would be implemented in the real world? This whole discussion here seems based on no real info that I can find anywhere.

                                Does someone have a link for an actual fully proposed GBI?

                                DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DustinB3403D
                                  DustinB3403 @Obsolesce
                                  last edited by

                                  @Obsolesce http://www.globalincome.org/English/Global-Basic-Income.html

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                                    last edited by

                                    @Obsolesce said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                    What are the exact terms of GBI as it would be implemented in the real world? This whole discussion here seems based on no real info that I can find anywhere.

                                    Does someone have a link for an actual fully proposed GBI?

                                    It's a generic concept. But most basics are assumed. Like that it does what it says, lol.

                                    GBI is one thing, Scott's 98% useless theory is what it is based on, but lots of people believe in GBI and not in the 98% theory.

                                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                      @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                      @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                      @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                      perhaps it would be possible to bring all the poor people up to the level you are accustomed to.

                                      That's not at all realistic, since GBI isn't about bringing people up to others standards of living. But getting people out of the workforce who are redundant.

                                      Doesn't matter, equal is equal. You have no way to "earn" more if you are doing nothing. What you did in the past is irrelevant.

                                      For the first generation it absolutely is relevant. Those first 2 billion of "middle class and upper class" will require a SOL that matches what they have today. Otherwise the system would never get off the ground.

                                      You think they'd opt to starve instead? Since their jobs wouldn't exist and their standard of living would be "starvation."

                                      They wouldn't starve though. They'd just keep working and killing of the GBI idea by showing what "working smart and hard" can produce. Making others envious of them and refusing their NP food and board.

                                      No, workers have no decision making power in the GBI / 98% theory. Their jobs don't exist and they have no means of creating more value since working for no purpose would not be rewarded.

                                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ObsolesceO
                                        Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                        @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                        @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                        @Dashrender said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                        awww - our premises are off. Scott came up with that title, not me.
                                        His idea is that 95% of the population doesn't work - because there are no jobs for them, because (likely) it's all handled by computers/automation.
                                        So 95% of the planet will be on the government dime as it were.

                                        Right, so assuming scott is accurate in that 95% of the world isn't capable of working because there literally is no job. Then absolutely give those people a quality place to live in, food to eat and a means to live happily.

                                        Out of the other 5% as it were, maybe 3% already have a standard of living they can presumably afford. Maintain that 3% where they are and then 2% who are unable to actually afford the life they live today can go down to the 95% level.

                                        So you consider yourself one of the 5%?

                                        Of people who are living a sustainable lifestyle that isn't over abundant and drowning in debt. Yes.

                                        Fair - but not what I was asking - do you consider your income to be above what that of the 95%'ers should/would be?

                                        And assuming you are jobless like those 95% (come on - IT folks will be out on their ear like most others), do you feel you deserve more than the 95%'ers?

                                        Right, IT is mostly a bloat job, here to prop up workers who are unneeded. Think about it, most of us spend most of our time fixing things that should never be broken in the first place. Remove the users, and most IT goes away instantly.

                                        I don't think you mean IT... perhaps bench work is like that.

                                        scottalanmillerS coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @IRJ
                                          last edited by

                                          @IRJ said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                          @IRJ said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                          @DustinB3403 said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                          I'd happily live on a BGI so long as it maintained my standard of living at the time the system was created.

                                          It's a basic income. Should maintain you comfortably, but should not maintain you above a minimum level. Maybe in 200 years when we are at Star Trek level, but that's a long way off. For now, it's acceptable housing, food, public transportation, television, etc. It's the basics, it's the minimum.

                                          It is possible with free energy. Literally things that cost $10 would cost pennies. When you consider the fuel costs, costs of gather resources, any machining, etc.

                                          Energy is never free. Nor does it matter. Because what makes GBI work is that it uses less energy than the alternatives.

                                          In theory energy could 100% be free. There are already workable theories out there for it. There are propulsion systems that should work in theory, but they are missing a single element or enough power generation at the current time. So if one of those pieces were to be solved, we could have free energy.

                                          Actually, theory says energy can't be completely free. Cheap, sure. Sustainable, sure. But not free. Unless you mean that in theory the energy to build solar plants could be made up by the solar plant itself and generate income on its own - then yes, but that's not what people normally mean when saying that something is free.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • coliverC
                                            coliver @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                            @Obsolesce said in Moving to Guaranteed Basic Income:

                                            What are the exact terms of GBI as it would be implemented in the real world? This whole discussion here seems based on no real info that I can find anywhere.

                                            Does someone have a link for an actual fully proposed GBI?

                                            It's a generic concept. But most basics are assumed. Like that it does what it says, lol.

                                            GBI is one thing, Scott's 98% useless theory is what it is based on, but lots of people believe in GBI and not in the 98% theory.

                                            UBI\GBI goes a lot further back then Scott Adams IIRC.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 2 / 9
                                            • First post
                                              Last post