Current Status of SEO
-
@jaredbusch said in Current Status of SEO:
@minion-queen said in Current Status of SEO:
The market there is a PITA to deal with.
We love you anyway
Yeah I noticed that as well.
You must like @Minion-Queen ... anyone else would have received a much harsher reply,
-
@scottalanmiller said in Current Status of SEO:
SEO is a marketing term and not based on the English words that it represents. It's a reference to specifically attempting to game search engines for ranking without doing the things that search engines want (good content.)
Where do you get that definition from? It's not my understanding of what SEO is. Gaming might or might not come into it but that's not specifically SEO.
Google's definition is "Search engine optimization: the process of making your site better for search engines."
Gaming has to be a waste of time these days, anyway. How is some SEO kid going to game Google, with their resources and brains? Google will always win. But SEO should also be about following best practices, and I see plenty of value in companies offering that service. It's about following Google's guidelines, not trying to circumvent them.
-
@jaredbusch said in Current Status of SEO:
@minion-queen said in Current Status of SEO:
The market there is a PITA to deal with.
We love you anyway
Aww thank you
-
@carnival-boy said in Current Status of SEO:
Google's definition is "Search engine optimization: the process of making your site better for search engines."
No one in the industry has ever used it that way. That's how they want customers to feel, but it has never from day one been what the term referred to. That's never been was SEO companies provided.
-
@carnival-boy said in Current Status of SEO:
Gaming has to be a waste of time these days, anyway. How is some SEO kid going to game Google, with their resources and brains?
This is how it has always been since day one of SEO. You've just explained why the whole thing is a scam.
-
@carnival-boy said in Current Status of SEO:
But SEO should also be about following best practices, and I see plenty of value in companies offering that service. It's about following Google's guidelines, not trying to circumvent them.
I feel like you are just repeating me back to myself. Those good policies should just be "good content", that's what Google has always told us to do. Be textually complete, make good content, don't leave taxonomic indicators and meta data blank... all just the basics of making content pages online regardless of SEO thoughts.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Current Status of SEO:
That's never been was SEO companies provided.
I've dealt with a few companies in the UK that have provided that.
-
@carnival-boy said in Current Status of SEO:
@scottalanmiller said in Current Status of SEO:
That's never been was SEO companies provided.
I've dealt with a few companies in the UK that have provided that.
How did they provide that? It's done through good content. Were they the content creators? I've never seen any company that advertises SEO that worked on the real stuff, rather than smoke and mirrors.
If they do REAL SEO stuff, we call them content creators or writers here.
-
It's not just good content, there are technical aspects to consider as well. And what is good content? An SEO expert can advise on how to turn bad content in to good content, without being a writer.
-
@carnival-boy said in Current Status of SEO:
It's not just good content, there are technical aspects to consider as well.
Other than what I mentioned? If so, isn't that gaming?
-
@carnival-boy said in Current Status of SEO:
An SEO expert can advise on how to turn bad content in to good content, without being a writer.
Beyond how to be a good writer? I'm not confident in this. This is what SEO salespeople claim, but at the end of the day it's quality content and writing and beyond that, you are into the gaming that Google is watching for.
