ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Small office phone setup

    IT Discussion
    7
    115
    24.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      PoE could be done down the road, FreePBX is free, FOP2 is only $40. Phones are a real cost but one that starts paying for itself immediately. The longer you wait to replace the phones, the more you pay month to month. So if you know that they will ever be replaced, the sooner the better. It's like having a leaky gas tank. It costs money to replace, but it has to be done. The sooner you do it, the less gas is wasted.

      I don't follow - where am I wasting money right now by keeping my current solution that I'm only spending money on the services provided by the telco?

      And if not replacing all at once causes you to make decisions based on branch needs instead of company needs you might be costing yourself even more by creating a more complicated setup that might plague you for a long time.

      I definitely could do this in a single big bang - put I need to proof of concept it before it would be accepted here. I've ordered a few Yeahlink deskphones to test with my new FreePBX install

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said:

        I don't follow - where am I wasting money right now by keeping my current solution that I'm only** spending money on the services provided by the telco**?

        That's the money.

        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Going to full VoIP you can drop the expensive telco and go to lower cost, higher reliability VoIP vendors.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @Dashrender said:

            I don't follow - where am I wasting money right now by keeping my current solution that I'm only** spending money on the services provided by the telco**?

            That's the money.

            I'm in a contract - so that won't change for a while (at my main location).

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              I'm in a contract - so that won't change for a while (at my main location).

              Oh that sucks!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @thanksajdotcom
                last edited by JaredBusch

                @ajstringham said:

                I don't understand peoples' need to go PoE for phones. While I agree it can be handy, I look at it as one more thing to break. You have to buy PoE switches, which are, from what I've seen, a fair bit more expensive than standard switches. Upgrading the cabling would make sense though. Still, what's the big deal about plugging in one more cord for a phone?

                It is easily cost effective.

                The HP 1910-24G is $266.
                The HP 1910-24G PoE (375W) is $540

                Cost Difference = $274

                Yealink T42G Power Adapter = $4.50 * 24 = $108

                Add in reduced install time (say 3 minutes per desk to unbox power cord and plug it in) = 72 minutes * $120/hour = $144

                Then add in the benefit of having solid backup power for the phones because it is centralized.

                PoE always makes sense if you are going to be buying a switch.

                If you are not buying a switch to begin with, then you have more to justify.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  @JaredBusch are you getting Yealinks without power adapters? I've not seen any Yealink or Snom models that don't include the power bricks. So the PoE cost is all extra. Have they stopped including them with all models?

                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @JaredBusch are you getting Yealinks without power adapters? I've not seen any Yealink or Snom models that don't include the power bricks. So the PoE cost is all extra. Have they stopped including them with all models?

                    All of the T4X series ship without them.

                    thanksajdotcomT scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • thanksajdotcomT
                      thanksajdotcom @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch said:

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @JaredBusch are you getting Yealinks without power adapters? I've not seen any Yealink or Snom models that don't include the power bricks. So the PoE cost is all extra. Have they stopped including them with all models?

                      All of the T4X series ship without them.

                      Yeah, but most users wouldn't need anything more than a T2X series.

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        @ajstringham said:

                        Yeah, but most users wouldn't need anything more than a T2X series.

                        The T4X series is the current line up. The T3X series is no longer receiving updates. I have not checked into the T2x series.

                        The T41 is the goto baseline phone IMO. The T42 for gigabit passthrough.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @JaredBusch said:

                          All of the T4X series ship without them.

                          Oh that sucks 😞

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch
                            last edited by JaredBusch

                            Just checked the Yealink website and the T32G had an update in July with only security fixes.

                            Prior to that it was last updated March 2013. They have not officially announced anything to my knowledge, but I call that a product going EoL.

                            Source: http://www.yealink.com/Upload/firmware/T3X/Yealink T3X-V70 Release Notes.pdf

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              Or it could just be considered very stable and nothing new needs to be done to it. As long as they are still supporting and patching when needed, that's not EOL.

                              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • JaredBuschJ
                                JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                Or it could just be considered very stable and nothing new needs to be done to it. As long as they are still supporting and patching when needed, that's not EOL.

                                Ok, how about this. The T3X series is NOT included in the new beta version of firmware v73.
                                http://forum.yealink.com/forum/announcements.php?aid=8

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                  last edited by

                                  @JaredBusch that's "better".

                                  Time to get some new phones, I think 🙂 Although my next desk phone is likely to be a Ubiquiti rather than a Yealink, need to test it.

                                  JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JaredBuschJ
                                    JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller The long feature update drought was why I went with the T4X series in March when I bid the last VoIP roll out. I figured I may have some minor stability issues, but at least I would not be on an EoL series of phones.

                                    Looks like a decent set of new features in the new firmware.
                                    ftp://ftp.yealink.com/00.Firmwares/V73/Release Notes/Yealink_SIP_phones_Relese_Notes_of_Version73.pdf

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Maybe it is EOL but not EOS. I believe that they are still patching for some time, even if not rolling out new features or cool updates. If you already have them, I would not be worried about updating. But if buying new, I would agree to look to the 4 series instead.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by JaredBusch

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        Although my next desk phone is likely to be a Ubiquiti rather than a Yealink, need to test it.

                                        I'm interested in them personally, but not a lot for end users. The problem with any of the android based desk phones like this is how to restrict it without having to deal with an MDM solution for the desk phone.

                                        I would much prefer to find a quality softphone that can be configured with a GUI that looks like a desk phone so people can have visible button functions for BLF and Call Park, etc. Something with an XML based skinning engine would be awesome.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          I think that an MDM solution for deskphones that run Android is probably a foregone conclusion. MDM is the new management paradigm for the "mobile OS" world. Maybe they will make a special MDM just for these that is included in the UniFi platform. That would be great, but would still be MDM.

                                          You can use Meraki MDM for free to do the basic stuff.

                                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            You can use Meraki MDM for free to do the basic stuff.

                                            Let's hope for Ubiquiti's sake they do come out with an MDM solution for this - it would be so ironic to use Meraki's (Cisco's) solution to support Ubiquiti's stuff.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 6 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post