Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative "
-
@jaredbusch said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
The reason that I don't trust issabel yet is because they have not made (that I have found) their code public anywhere yet.
They made a github account but the code is not there.
During early beta, they used to reference an install script on repo.issbel.org but that no longer works.
Oh, good point. I had not looked to see what was on their GitHub.
-
Surprised you guys never look at FreeSwitch? I know it's aimed more at the carrier voice market but it makes a decent PBX (There are GUI packages). It was designed for multi-tenancy and call centers which are another really nice to have the more advanced feature set.
-
@john-nicholson freeswitch is a competitor to asterisk, not freepbx. It's gear more towards developers.
There was a project called bluebox that akin to the early Freepbx. It was a GUI for freeswith. But those guys mostly work on another project now that focuses on carrier solutions.
There is Fusion PBX which is still very active, and similar to FreePBX. It is geared towards multiple servers and redundancy rather than a single box deployment
-
@john-nicholson It has beena few years since I looked at FreeSwitch as a choice for a stand alone PBX and it simply was not there for the layman.
You are right that I have not looked in recent years. I will have to remedy that.
-
@bigbear I've used the platform for PBX use cases (partially because it was more robust than Asterisk back in the day when I was a VOIP guy). I know a DEV who's done some of the work on the windows builds (Old boss) is why I ask. I know a lot of call center people who've abandoned Asterisk for it.
-
@john-nicholson you used Fusion PBX or Asterisk?
There was also Cudatel, which is gone now.
-
The open source sipwise distro is actually a Class 5 switch, so not exactly a PBX but more of a carrier solutions.
Its too bad because they have some features that FreePBX doesn't have, and the CPBX is more of a long term service install.
Maybe its time we do a little networking and get somebody like sipwise or Brekeke to release a community FOSS edition, or try to get developers of some of the larger multi-server freeswitch products to release something. I can think of a dozen different people to approach.
-
@scottalanmiller incredible! I was heavily into this project in the late nineties. I still have several Spark boxes somewhere that I refuse to get rid of. Haiku has been such a disappointment...
Wasn't BeOS 5 the version you can launch from a Windows folder? I had a BeBox as well but a friend never returned it.
-
@bigbear said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
@john-nicholson you used Fusion PBX or Asterisk?
There was also Cudatel, which is gone now.
We used to do Cudatel Support.
-
@bigbear said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
@scottalanmiller incredible! I was heavily into this project in the late nineties. I still have several Spark boxes somewhere that I refuse to get rid of. Haiku has been such a disappointment...
Wasn't BeOS 5 the version you can launch from a Windows folder? I had a BeBox as well but a friend never returned it.
BeOs is really cool. It's sad that it didn't make it. It was still pretty influential.
-
@scottalanmiller Just started this thread https://mangolassi.it/topic/14480/let-s-convince-someone-to-release-a-foss-pbx and looking for some support/feed back. I think we can convince someone to do this with a current production product. I have several ideas.
-
I think that the purpose of the Issabel is to continue creating the Add On Modules that was supported by Elastix , also it is based on CentOS 7 which will be more reliable than what Elastix 2.5 was.
anyway i think we need to wait till we find Issabel is stable distro and we can depend on it as we did with Elastix. -
@alyragab said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
I think that the purpose of the Issabel is to continue creating the Add On Modules that was supported by Elastix , also it is based on CentOS 7 which will be more reliable than what Elastix 2.5 was.
anyway i think we need to wait till we find Issabel is stable distro and we can depend on it as we did with Elastix.I assume that they are working form the nearly released Elastix 4 work. That was on CentOS 7 at the end.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
@alyragab said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
I think that the purpose of the Issabel is to continue creating the Add On Modules that was supported by Elastix , also it is based on CentOS 7 which will be more reliable than what Elastix 2.5 was.
anyway i think we need to wait till we find Issabel is stable distro and we can depend on it as we did with Elastix.I assume that they are working form the nearly released Elastix 4 work. That was on CentOS 7 at the end.
And it did work with a lot of patience and knowledge of the underlying systems. But it was a hard fail for the layman.
-
@jaredbusch said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
@scottalanmiller said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
@alyragab said in Issabel PBX " Elastix Alternative ":
I think that the purpose of the Issabel is to continue creating the Add On Modules that was supported by Elastix , also it is based on CentOS 7 which will be more reliable than what Elastix 2.5 was.
anyway i think we need to wait till we find Issabel is stable distro and we can depend on it as we did with Elastix.I assume that they are working form the nearly released Elastix 4 work. That was on CentOS 7 at the end.
And it did work with a lot of patience and knowledge of the underlying systems. But it was a hard fail for the layman.
True. I had it working, but it wasn't ready for prime time when they gave up on it all.
