ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Switching subnet /24 to /23

    IT Discussion
    7
    40
    6.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @LAH3385
      last edited by

      @LAH3385 said:

      @JaredBusch said:

      @LAH3385 said:

      Same question for DNS as well.

      There is no moving DNS. If you made the new DC a DC properly, then it already has all of the DNS.

      Now, if you are going to make this new DNS server the primary, then you do need to update that in the DHCP scope as well as in any static assigned devices.

      The reason I mentioned DNS is because I don't know what has been done to its configuration. DNS is probably the only section I rarely visit daily.

      Well, pull itup and go look at it. you will see everything is there. That is simply a function of making a Windows DC.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L
        LAH3385
        last edited by

        When will you need IPV6?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403
          last edited by

          As a business or home user you will likely never need IPv6.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • DustinB3403D
            DustinB3403
            last edited by

            IPv6 is for the world, as there are hundreds of billions of available IP addresses.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • L
              LAH3385 @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said:

              This is easy, you just have to plan it out. Note, you cannot "change" the scope of your DHCP server. You can choose to add another or wipe it and reimport it via PowerShell (what I typically do).

              1. Understand what your new range will be. Since you are on X.X.1.X/24. the new scope will be X.X.0.X/23.
              2. Update your router LAN IP to use the /23. If it was X.X.1.1/24, it is now X.X.1.1/23.
              3. Update your DC (asusming a WIndows network here) to use the new /23.
              4. Put a test device manually on X.X.0.X/23 and make sure you have internet and can ping the DC.
              5. Update all of your static devices to the /23.
              6. Export the DHCP Scope via PowerShell Export-DhcpServer -ComputerName dhcpserver.contoso.com -File C:\exportdir\dhcpexport.xml
              7. Edit the XML file to expand the scope. Here is an example of one I did this on a couple years ago. Basically change the ScopeID, SubnetMask, StartRange, and add an ExclusionRange for the entire X.X.0.1-X.X.0.255 initially. You can delete this exclusion in the GUI later when you are ready to use it.
                0_1458057915602_upload-d032b659-e66f-40cc-90f5-40be59de11d2
              8. Delete your current DHCP scope from the GUI.
              9. Import the updated scope from PowerShell. Import-DhcpServer -ComputerName dhcpserver.contoso.com -File C:\exports\dhcpexport.xml.
              10. Refresh the GUI, enable the scope, restart the service, etc.
              11. Make sure all the settings migrated in correctly.
              12. Force a machine to DHCP renew and you are done.

              Does this looks about right? 1.1-1.30 belong to current static IP addresses
              0_1458133908175_upload-53d7ed7b-6417-4b54-b646-f945e4953e54

              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @LAH3385
                last edited by

                @LAH3385 You noted the subnetmask as a /22 but noted the end range as 1.254. The end range of a /22 is 3.254.

                0_1458134281881_upload-97bd05bf-9d79-4265-a3f0-f0eeabb331c9

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • coliverC
                  coliver
                  last edited by

                  Am I reading that right that you want to to exclude the entire 192.168.0.1/24 subnet?

                  L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • L
                    LAH3385 @coliver
                    last edited by

                    @coliver said:

                    Am I reading that right that you want to to exclude the entire 192.168.0.1/24 subnet?

                    For the time being. yes. It will be open to public later. I don't have a solid game plan yet so might as well keep everything the way it is (starting at .1.xx)

                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • coliverC
                      coliver @LAH3385
                      last edited by

                      @LAH3385 said:

                      @coliver said:

                      Am I reading that right that you want to to exclude the entire 192.168.0.1/24 subnet?

                      For the time being. yes. It will be open to public later. I don't have a solid game plan yet so might as well keep everything the way it is (starting at .1.xx)

                      Ah, ok I was just checking.

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @coliver
                        last edited by

                        @coliver said:

                        @LAH3385 said:

                        @coliver said:

                        Am I reading that right that you want to to exclude the entire 192.168.0.1/24 subnet?

                        For the time being. yes. It will be open to public later. I don't have a solid game plan yet so might as well keep everything the way it is (starting at .1.xx)

                        Ah, ok I was just checking.

                        It is what I told him to do for the immediate change over. I suggested it, because every time I open up a range, I find something that was missed and suddenly people cannot do whatever task they need to.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • L
                          LAH3385
                          last edited by

                          @JaredBusch
                          To make it simpler for me. Would /22 starting at 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.4.254 better than 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.3.254?

                          coliverC DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @LAH3385
                            last edited by coliver

                            @LAH3385 said:

                            @JaredBusch
                            To make it simpler for me. Would /22 starting at 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.4.254 better than 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.3.254?

                            The /22 network that include 192.168.4.1 is 192.168.4.0-192.168.7.254.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender @LAH3385
                              last edited by

                              @LAH3385 said:

                              @JaredBusch
                              To make it simpler for me. Would /22 starting at 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.4.254 better than 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.3.254?

                              it doesn't work that way. You don't get to pick which addresses are part of your /22, the layout of bits in the subnet mask do.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                Here is a page that talks about how subnetting works, and why it works how it does.
                                https://www.techopedia.com/6/28587/internet/8-steps-to-understanding-ip-subnetting/3

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • L
                                  LAH3385
                                  last edited by

                                  I see.. Gotta play by their rules.

                                  JaredBuschJ DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JaredBuschJ
                                    JaredBusch @LAH3385
                                    last edited by

                                    @LAH3385 said:

                                    I see.. Gotta play by their rules.

                                    Look at the screenshot provided above, it shows you the range.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender @LAH3385
                                      last edited by

                                      @LAH3385 said:

                                      I see.. Gotta play by their rules.

                                      Lol thier rules? You're kidding right?

                                      This is all math and the way binary works... They are not just made up rules someone randomly decided to make.

                                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        @Dashrender said:

                                        They are not just made up rules someone randomly decided to make.

                                        lies! it is magic!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @LAH3385
                                          last edited by

                                          @LAH3385 said:

                                          I see.. Gotta play by their rules.

                                          The rules of the universe, yes.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 2 / 2
                                          • First post
                                            Last post